Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: religious, broadcasting, license

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 8 of 9. Next Document

Copyright 2000 P.G. Publishing Co.  
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

January 9, 2000, Sunday, TWO STAR EDITION

SECTION: EDITORIAL, Pg. E-2

LENGTH: 632 words

HEADLINE: MCCAIN AND WQEX;
THE SALE'S OPPONENTS LOSE SIGHT OF THE BIG PICTURE

BODY:


knight on campaign finance reform while taking the kind of political money and favors he does.

Though Sen. McCain acknowledges he's as much a creature of a corrupt funding system as anyone in Washington, the Arizona senator and Republican presidential candidate was hammered last week in newspaper articles and in a candidates' debate for trying to have it both ways.

The Post-Gazette broke the story two weeks ago, reporting Sen. McCain had received nearly $ 16,000 in campaign contributions last year from principals with Paxson Communications, a party in the three-way TV license sale and swap involving public channel WQEX. Stories elsewhere have detailed the senator's use of a Paxson corporate jet.

Pittsburgh opponents of the WQEX deal are cackling with glee over the McCain situation, but that's a shortsighted view. If they are political liberals - and none of them seem to deny that - then they must be supporters (like this newspaper) of campaign finance reform. And if they truly want that, there are few people on Capitol Hill who have been more dogged in raising the issue than John McCain. Give him credit for this, too: He does it in absolute defiance of his own Republican Party.

But acknowledging the big picture does not serve the agenda of political absolutists. They are riveted by one cause and one cause alone. This fixation blots out reality for them on several other fronts.

First, they fulminate over Sen. McCain's letters urging the Federal Communications Commission to act on the WQEX case, which languished before it for three years. Even if he is chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, which handles communications issues, he was not unreasonable to push a federal agency to make a decision. Other lawmakers -

Sens. Arlen Specter and Rick Santorum, and Reps. Ron Klink, Frank Mascara and Bill Coyne - did him one better; they demanded that the FCC approve, not just rule on, the WQEX transfer. And they were all acting within lawful bounds.

To those who would lynch Sen. McCain, it's as if Vice President Al Gore, whose major contributors include BellSouth and AT&T, never championed the "E-rate," a tax paid by phone customers that shifts millions of dollars to phone companies to do classroom wiring. It's as if former Sen. Bill Bradley, whose major contributors include firms on Wall Street, wasn't a key backer of the 1986 tax overhaul, which enriched wealthy individuals and corporations.

Not by any stretch is Sen. McCain the only elected person in Washington to go to bat for a political supporter.

Second, the opponents of the WQEXPaxson-Cornerstone license transfer rail against religious broadcasting - and its conservative social views - coming to a public television channel in Pittsburgh. But the sky is not falling.

WQEX is the underutilized sister station of WQED, the region's full-menu PBS-affiliated station. The very reason WQED wants to be paid for giving up WQEX is to retire its debt and strengthen public television in Pittsburgh.

As to a WQEX operated by religious broadcaster Cornerstone TeleVision, it would mirror similar arrangements around the country. The National Religious Broadcasters, an industry trade group, says 15 noncommercial educational TV stations are already licensed to religious broadcasters - all under FCC rules.

Despite all the fuss raised by opponents, Cornerstone is not taking over the public schools, it is taking on a public TV license.

Finally, and this is the real kicker, some of those who profess to save public television in Pittsburgh are quick to declare that if the WQEX transfer goes through, as approved last month by the FCC, they will withhold their financial contributions from WQED.

Shades of Vietnam, they would destroy the station to "save" it.

LOAD-DATE: January 11, 2000




Previous Document Document 8 of 9. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: religious, broadcasting, license
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.