|
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tuesday, February 16, 2000 |
CONTACT: Jerry Starr
202-638-6880
|
Coalition Defends Educational TV From Right-Wing
Takeover
Washington - A broad coalition of national educational and
religious organizations are urging their members to write to
Congress to fight a growing takeover of reserved educational
licenses by ultraconservative religious broadcasters under the guise
of religious freedom. Members are urged to tell their
representatives to oppose House Resolution 3525, known as the
"Religious Broadcasting Freedom Act" and Senate Bill S.2010, known
as the "Noncommercial Broadcasting Freedom Act."
The still growing coalition includes educational groups like the
National Education Association, Center for Media Education, People
for the American Way, Benton Foundation, Political Research
Associates and National Writers Union and religious groups like the
National Council of Churches, The Interfaith Alliance and Unitarian
Universalists.
Coalition coordinator Jerry Starr, Executive Director of Citizens
for Independent Public Broadcasting, observes, "Already having
easily intimidated the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) into
rescinding guidelines intended to protect educational licenses from
partisan abuse, the religious right and their political allies now
seek to deprive the FCC of all discretion to properly defend any
eligibility requirements for noncommercial educational (NCE)
television licenses."
Attorney John Crigler has notified the FCC that this is part of a
growing takeover of NCE broadcasting licenses by the religious
right. In the absence of any regulation, such groups have flooded
the FCC with applications for NCE licenses, effectively barring
community organizations with a genuine educational purpose. Donald
Wildmon's American Family Association alone holds 165 NCE radio
licenses and has 178 pending full-service applications.
Cutting through the rhetoric and reminding the FCC of its
legislative responsibility, Diane Shust, Manager of Federal
Relations at the National Education Association, has proposed that
meaningful eligibility requirements for reserved educational
licenses "is not discrimination against religion, but a defense of
education. It is not unwarranted federal intrusion, but the FCC
doing its duty to protect the public interest, convenience, and
necessity."
Randy Naylor, Director of the 53 million-member National Council
of Churches (NCC) agrees, "Protecting the integrity of a
noncommercial and public channel does not constitute discrimination
against religious broadcasters." In the view of the NCC, these
channels "should provide a diversity of truly educational programs
for all significant constituencies in the community."
Rob Cavenaugh, Legislative Director, Unitarian Universalist
Association of Congregations adds, "The issue here is not government
hostility towards religion, but weighing the needs of the whole
community against the wants of a strident religious minority." Ralph
G. Neas, President of People for the American Way, has accused
religious broadcasters of "asking for special privileges and
claiming that failure to grant them is discrimination."
Starr points out that, under the guise of "religious freedom,"
many of these broadcasters pass off hate mongering as educational.
In the Pittsburgh license transfer case that sparked the new
guidelines and the reaction, local clergy and academics documented
for the FCC Cornerstone TeleVision attacks against Catholics, Jews
(e.g. leaders of an international conspiracy of bankers and
intellectuals to create a "New World Order"), Hindus ("the Kingdom
of the enemy"), Unitarians (promoters of "divorce, teenage pregnancy
and venereal disease"), Mormons ("a cult"), and even Methodists,
Baptists, Episcopalians, Lutherans, and Congregationalists who are
alleged to be "not really Christian" unless they are "born
again."
Members of the coalition are asked to place action alerts on
their web sites and to link with Citizens for Independent Public
Broadcasting so that members might receive direction on how to write
to their representatives in Congress on this matter. "Beyond that,"
Starr says, "we plan to call for a rulemaking to revisit this
question of eligibility requirements for reserved education
frequencies and how the public interest might best be served." He
adds, "Perhaps in a non-election year, we might have a less
hysterical climate in which to reflect on the true meaning of
education and religious freedom as they apply to broadcasting."
Background
The two resolutions follow an FCC decision on the Pittsburgh
license transfer applications that exposed Senator John McCain's
influence peddling on behalf of media mogul Lowell "Bud" Paxson. The
highly controversial deal proposed to transfer the license for
Pittsburgh's popular second public television station, WQEX, to
televangelist station, Cornerstone TeleVision, so that Paxson could
take over Cornerstone's old license for his Pax TV network.
The Save Pittsburgh Public Television campaign generated tens of
thousands of letters and phone calls, plus organizational
resolutions representing hundreds of thousands more in opposition to
the deal because residents did not want to lose WQEX and were
offended by its proposed replacement which a group of Pittsburgh
academics and clergy charged offered bible thumping hatemongering as
educational programming.
Under pressure by McCain, the commissioners narrowly approved
(3-2 vote) the sale/swap conditional on Cornerstone's promises to
broaden its governance and programming. However, by the same margin,
the commissioners voted to interpret the guidelines that educational
frequencies provide programming that is "primarily educational" and
"responsive to the overall public" as meaning that at least half the
station's schedule must consist of programs that are "primarily
educational in purpose." Moreover, "programming primarily devoted to
religious exhortation (e.g. preaching), proselytizing or personal
statements of belief [while permitted], generally will not qualify
as educational programming."
Within days, a torrent of protest from members of the National
Religious Broadcasters (NRB), a self-described "Association of
Christian Communicators," Paxson Communications, and their
conservative Republican allies, intimidated the FCC into rescinding
its own guidelines. Several reporters also have cited pressure from
Presidential candidate Al Gore who is running as a "born again"
Christian against Bill Bradley and did not want to have to defend
the additional guidance during the campaign.
In her dissent, commissioner Gloria Tristani deplored her
colleagues' capitulation to "an organized campaign of distortion and
demagoguery." Tristani stated, "In a religiously diverse society,
sectarian religious programming, by its very nature, does not serve
the 'entire community' and is not 'educational' to
non-adherents."
A spokesperson for the NRB boasted about winning the "battle,"
but vowed to continue the "war." In mid-February, FCC Mass Media
Bureau Chief Roy Stewart appeared at the NRB's annual meeting to
assure them that the commission is going back to relying "on the
good-faith judgment of religious broadcasters that the programming
serve an educational purpose." Nevertheless, Oxley and Brownback
have vowed to leave their resolutions in Congress to make certain
that the FCC does not regulate religious broadcasters too closely in
the future.
Before the FCC's sudden retreat, the Rev. Barry W. Lynn,
Executive Director, Americans United for the Separation of Church
and State, had commended the new guidelines as a "fair and
reasonable" attempt "to ensure that educational TV stations are
truly educational and not extensions of somebody's religious
ministry." He urged the FCC "not to cave in to pressure from
powerful religious broadcasters and their political allies." In the
aftermath, Lynn has reaffirmed his organization's commitment to
protecting the integrity of educational broadcasting license
assignments. |