Madam Speaker, I thank the distinguished
gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Dingell) for yielding me the
time.
Madam Speaker, at the close of debate I will
offer a motion to commit S. 1287 to committee. I oppose S.
1287 because it would irresponsibly ship nuclear wastes to
Yucca Mountain, a location that scientific evidence has
established cannot safely contain the massive heat and
radioactivity generated by 100,000 tons of high-level nuclear
waste.
After more than 15 years of study, it is clear
that Yucca Mountain is not what Congress had in mind when it
set high standards for finding a nuclear waste disposal site.
A nuclear waste site must be free of groundwater contamination
for many, many centuries to come; but Yucca Mountain is now
known to be at high risk for water contamination that will
speed the release of radioactivity into the water supplies
over a vast area of the Nevada desert.
A nuclear waste site must be free of
earthquakes, but Yucca Mountain is in one of the more active
earthquake zones in the country. It has been shaken
repeatedly, even over the past year, by severe earthquake
jolts. And a nuclear waste site must be free of volcanic
activity, but scientific findings show that Yucca Mountain is
subject to potential eruptions deep within the earth that
could cause a catastrophe of unimaginable proportions.
I offer this damaging assessment of Yucca
Mountain as a backdrop to the many flaws identified with S.
1287. Bills like S. 1287 only exist because they offer a
political, not a scientific, approach to the Nation nuclear
waste problem.
S. 1287 is the latest ploy in a long line of
actions that have been taken to undermine the tough standards
for a nuclear repository that Congress established 18 years
ago. S. 1287 constrains the Environmental Protection Agency
from implementing their final rule for radiation standards, at
the same time this bill opens up the door to making radiation
standards a political exercise in the hope that a new
administration would shift its policies away from strong
radiation standards towards more lax limits on radiation
exposure.
S. 1287 also takes a dangerous and arbitrary
position by mandating that high-level nuclear waste would be
shipped to Nevada beginning in the year 2006, years before
testing and construction at Yucca Mountain could possibly be
completed.
There is absolutely no logic to sending
high-level nuclear wastes to Nevada, the most dangerous
substance known to mankind, to a place that it is not safe to
begin with and certainly would not be ready to safely accept
this toxic garbage.
It is an outrage that the Republican leadership
is even considering this legislation. Common sense should
dictate that in the light of a promised presidential veto and
the ability for the Senate to sustain that veto, that we waste
not one more moment of our precious time with this issue.
Let us focus our time and energy on fighting for
prescription medication for our seniors, a Patients' Bill of
Rights, finding ways to protect Social Security and Medicare,
and other important issues confronting this great Nation. |