Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: yucca mountain

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 149 of 241. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Denver Publishing Company  
DENVER ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS

November 17, 1999, Wednesday

SECTION: Local; Ed. Final; Pg. 7A

LENGTH: 439 words

HEADLINE: STATE SAYS NUCLEAR WASTE UNWELCOME ON HIGHWAYS

BYLINE: By Berny Morson, and Marlys Duran, News Staff Writers

BODY:
Nuclear waste is unwelcome - whether in Denver's Mousetrap or on Colorado's mountain highways, state officials told their federal counterparts Tuesday.

The U.S. Energy Department plans to send waste from nuclear reactors nationwide to a burial site in Nevada, and Interstate 70 appears prominently on the travel routes.

The Colorado State Patrol and elected officials are worried that an accident could shut the state's main east-west route ''for hours to days,'' said Patrol Capt. Allan Turner, who heads the hazardous materials unit. Turner was among speakers at an Energy Department hearing in Denver to take comments on the environmental impact statement drafted for the burial plan.

An estimated 70,000 tons of highly radioactive heavy metal will be sent to the burial site at Yucca Mountain, near the California border, beginning in 2010.

If the environmental impact statement is approved next year, President Clinton will make the final decision on whether to start the shipments.

Denver City Councilwoman Debbie Ortega noted that highway and rail routes pass through the city's poorest neighborhoods, clustered around the Mousetrap at I-70 and Interstate 25.

Residents there have been evacuated several times in recent years because of overturned rail cars carrying hazardous material.

''This is something neighborhoods in my district have done more than their fair share of times,'' Ortega said.

Turner said following the hearing that the state has closed I- 70 to nuclear materials because of steep grades and tight curves. An accident in Glenwood Canyon, for example, would paralyze the state.

'We're pretty adamant in saying that's not a suitable route for this kind of material,'' Turner said.

DOE officials are not saying the waste will come through Colorado.

Although I-70 is shown in the agency's maps, the route is purely hypothetical, said Steve Maheras, the DOE's transportation analyst. The actual route will be chosen four years before shipments start.

The uncertainty angers state officials, who say they can't assess the risk to their communities or start training response teams unless they know the route the material will take, said Turner, who spoke on behalf of a committee representing 11 Western states.

The policy also angers residents.

''I'm really confused about that and I want to know what's going on,'' said Amy Hadden Marsh, an environmental activist from Glenwood Springs.

But backers of the plan said concerns are exaggerated.

''This is a very safe operation, '' said Robert Jefferson, a New Mexico consultant to the Nuclear Energy Institute.





GRAPHIC: Map
Locator Map / WASTE BURIAL SITE. By News Staff. FILE: UNAVAILABLE


LOAD-DATE: November 19, 1999




Previous Document Document 149 of 241. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: yucca mountain
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.