Back to National Journal
3 of 3 results     Previous Story |   | Back to Results List

10-07-2000

POLITICS: When Local Trumps National

The notion that "all politics is local" isn't just a cliche this
year. In many tight House races, the adage is as true as ever.

Sure, George W. Bush and Al Gore emphasize national issues, from Medicare and prescription drug prices to gun control and national security. In turn, national reporters often frame Election 2000 as a battle over the big issues. Yet the party that gains control of the House will have accomplished that feat by winning a smattering of widely scattered contests-contests that are often won or lost on local, rather than national, issues.

In some districts, voters' choices will depend heavily on debates about local job growth, suburban sprawl, or transportation projects. In other cases, the balance can be tipped by turnout rates influenced by the presence of other candidates or referendums on the ballot.

Consider Kentucky's 3rd Congressional District, held by second-term Republican Anne Northup. This fall, Northup faces state Rep. Eleanor Jordan, an African-American. Although the two candidates have talked about national issues, some of their most attention-grabbing moves have dealt with more-local matters. For instance, Northup's first television ad against Jordan took Jordan to task for voting to raise her own pay as a legislator. It also showed footage of her on the legislative floor telling her colleagues: "I urge you to pass this bill. Let's get on with it. I have a fund-raiser at 6 o'clock, and I want to get out of here."

A proposed city-county merger could also have an impact. A series of racially tinged battles between the Louisville police department and the mayor's office has heightened racial tension in Northup's district-a factor that could prompt an unusually large turnout by suburbanites opposed to merging the city and the county. And a big turnout by suburbanites could help Northup.

To be sure, some races are more nationalized than others. A lot depends on whether national Republican or Democratic themes are likely to play well in a given district. Four of the hottest House races in California provide a distinct contrast: the open seat being vacated by GOP Rep. Tom Campbell and the seats being defended by endangered Republican Reps. James E. Rogan, Steven T. Kuykendall, and Brian P. Bilbray.

Allan Hoffenblum, publisher of the nonpartisan California Target Book, said that the Kuykendall and Bilbray races have taken on a nationalized character, whereas the Campbell open seat and the Rogan re-election bid have a more localized flavor. The difference, Hoffenblum said, stems from the different dynamics in the districts.

Kuykendall, who represents a ring of southern Los Angeles suburbs, and Bilbray, who represents a portion of San Diego, are running against moderate Democratic women. In both districts, moderate, independent-minded suburbanites are considered key. As a result, the incumbents and challengers are trying to portray themselves as in tune with the mainstream on such critical national issues as health care and education.

By contrast, Hoffenblum said, Democratic voters are multiplying so fast in the districts held by Campbell and Rogan that both must be considered "borrowed" seats for the GOP. In that environment, he said, GOP candidates have little choice but to soft-pedal their party's national message.

Florida contests also show signs of taking local cues. A spat emerged when the National Republican Congressional Committee placed TV advertisements attacking Linda Chapin, the Democrat running for the seat being vacated by GOP Rep. Bill McCollum. The commercials tag Chapin as "soft on convicts" because as Orange County chairwoman, she allowed the county jail director to install cable television in correctional facilities. (Three Florida television stations pulled ads after Chapin accused them of being misleading, but the NRCC continued to run a slightly changed version of the ad.)

Other House races around the country have gotten a boost from factors that have little to do with the national political scene. For instance, Democrat Dianne Byrum, who is in the race to succeed Democratic Rep. Deborah Ann Stabenow in Michigan's 8th District, could be helped by Democratic-leaning teachers turning out against a school voucher initiative. The teachers' union strongly opposes the ballot measure.

In some districts, a mix of national and local themes has prevailed. In Nevada, Democratic Rep. Shelley Berkley has talked about prescription drug prices and health care, while her opponent, GOP state Sen. Jon Porter, has attacked Berkley's stances on tax issues, said political analyst Jon Ralston of Las Vegas. Yet one of the biggest issues has been whether Nevada should become the nation's permanent repository of nuclear waste-an ongoing battle with significant local impact.

In Washington, both national parties' intense focus on a few contested seats has had a nationalizing effect.

"You have all of these imported guns from the parties trying to make candidates sound their national themes," said Joel Connelly, a national political correspondent with the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

At a recent debate between Democrat Rick Larsen and Republican John Koster, Connelly said he "got the feeling that if either candidate offered an original thought, the candidate would be immediately caned by their handlers. Local issues will certainly influence campaigns here, but we do have far more nationalized campaigns in this state than we used to."

Louis Jacobson National Journal
Need A Reprint Of This Article?
National Journal Group offers both print and electronic reprint services, as well as permissions for academic use, photocopying and republication. Click here to order, or call us at 202-266-7230.

3 of 3 results     Previous Story |   | Back to Results List