Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: rising gas prices, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 2 of 18. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 2000 Federal News Service, Inc.  
Federal News Service

June 28, 2000, Wednesday

SECTION: PREPARED TESTIMONY

LENGTH: 828 words

HEADLINE: PREPARED TESTIMONY OF THOMAS BARRETT UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE 5TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
 
BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
 
SUBJECT - SOLUTIONS TO COMPETITIVE PROBLEMS IN THE OIL INDUSTRY: PART 3

BODY:
 Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify before you today on the topic "Solutions to Competitive Problems in the Oil Industry." This is a significant and important issue, and I have heard from numerous constituents about the impact of this issue on their families. I hope today's hearing leads to a better understanding of the consequences of these exorbitant prices for consumers, and what we can do to get and keep prices down.

Although rising gas prices are affecting an increasing number of communities across the country, unexplained price spikes have been plaguing southeastern Wisconsin since the middle of May. The cost of gas rose from an average of $1.48 a gallon in early May to $1.69 a gallon by May 12, and to over $2 by the middle of June. In response to these escalating costs, I joined other Wisconsin lawmakers in demanding answers and requesting assistance from the federal agencies. At our request, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Energy (DOE) went to Milwaukee and Chicago on June 12 to investigate gasoline supply issues for our region. In addition, members of the Wisconsin Congressional delegation asked the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate the oil industry's role in the sudden price hike. As you are all aware, this investigation is currently underway. The entire Wisconsin delegation also joined with me in asking the Department of Transportation (DOT) to investigate the status of the Explorer Pipeline, which has not operated at full capacity since March 10 because of a rupture.

Because of the intolerable price differential between RFG and conventional gasoline affecting the Milwaukee area, I also joined other members of the Wisconsin Congressional Delegation in twice asking EPA for a temporary waiver from the RFG program until prices could be stabilized. I requested this waiver in hopes of bringing price relief to consumers in southeastern Wisconsin.

As you know, Mr. Chairman, the cost of producing RFG Phase II with ethanol, the oxygenate of choice in Milwaukee and Chicago, was estimated by the EPA to only be about 5 to 8 cents more per gallon than conventional gasoline. The DOE estimates were only slightly higher. Given these estimates, it is unclear how the oil companies and others can point to the Phase II requirements as the primary factor in the price differential between RFG and conventional gas -- especially when the wholesale price deferential in Milwaukee yesterday was 8 cents per gallon, while in Chicago RFG was actually cheaper at the wholesale level than conventional gas.

Moreover, oil companies' assertions that Phase II is so costly because of the refining difficulties associated with ethanol-blended RFG are troublesome in light of the fact that industry has had seven years to prepare for the implementation of the program. During this period, the industry participated in a formal regulatory-negotiation process with EPA and was also a part of the agency's implementation assessment in 1999. Never did the industry did identify production issues that would warrant such high costs.

But the most amazing fact before the committee today pertains to the timing of the FTC investigation and the drop in wholesale prices of ethanol gasoline (see graph). On June 15, EPA Administrator Browner and DOE Secretary Richardson wrote to FTC Chairman Pitofsky requesting a full and expedited investigation into the pricing of reformulated gas by the oil companies in Milwaukee and Chicago.

On June 15, the average wholesale RFG price per gallon was $1.58; by June 27 it had dropped nearly 33 cents to $1.25.6. The wholesale price differential between RFG and conventional gas is now 8 cents in southeastern Wisconsin. We can debate until the cows come home about whether the FTC investigation led to this drop or whether, as industry claims, this drop would have occurred regardless. The fact of the matter is, however, that since FTC has launched its investigation, the wholesale price of reformulated gasoline has dropped markedly in the Milwaukee and Chicago areas.

But, unfortunately, we aren't out of the woods yet. This significant wholesale price reduction, which occurred without any changes to the RFG program, has yet to be felt at the pump. Average retail RFG prices are down only slightly. Thus, motorists in southeastern Wisconsin are still paying an unfair price for gas. The most important question of the day is when will the oil companies pass these price reductions on to our consumers? For everyone's sake, I hope the answer is today.

Thank you for the opportunity to present this testimony. I look forward to reading the testimony of all the witnesses who are here today, and hope all of us working together will find a way to get prices down and achieve a long-term strategy to prevent these types of problems in the future.



END

LOAD-DATE: June 29, 2000




Previous Document Document 2 of 18. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: rising gas prices, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.