Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: rising AND gas prices

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 141 of 370. Next Document

Copyright 2000 / Los Angeles Times  
Los Angeles Times

 View Related Topics 

June 24, 2000, Saturday, Home Edition

SECTION: Part A; Part 1; Page 1; National Desk

LENGTH: 1610 words

HEADLINE: IN RACE, RISING GAS PRICES ARE MAKE-OR-BRAKE ISSUE; 
CAMPAIGN: SOARING COSTS LEAVE MIDWESTERNERS PUMPED UP TO VOTE. GORE AND BUSH TRY TO WOO THEM.

BYLINE: ERIC SLATER, TIMES STAFF WRITER 


DATELINE: WILMETTE, Ill.

BODY:
In any other part of the country, the marquee at the downtown Amoco station might be puzzling on several levels. Unleaded gas, it says, is going for "$ Z.29" a gallon.

Folks here know this station, like so many others across the Great Plains, has simply run out of 2s.

With the presidential election looming just the other side of the summer driving season, gas prices in parts of the Midwest remain 50, 60, even 70 cents higher than in most of the country, even after beginning to drop on Friday. And it is the voters of the Midwest--cabbies now working four extra hours a day to cover gas costs, parents canceling family vacations--who may well pick the next president.

In this North Chicago suburb, a swing district in a swing state known for its well-educated and politically astute electorate, exasperated motorists said they were nearing the point of forgoing party allegiance if the other candidate could bring down the prices.

"We usually go Republican, but we're willing to go Democrat if they can get this done," said one woman as she pumped in 9.1 gallons for her $ 20 bill. "Whichever candidate can lower these prices is going to get the office."

Not since the gas crunch of 1979--when a hyperbolic New York congressman told Energy Department officials, "You are on the verge of bringing down a presidency"--has the cost of a gallon of gas become such a combustible political issue.

But 1979 was not an election year. And Jimmy Carter was already in serious trouble for reasons that had nothing to do with the price of gas.

In what is shaping up to be a close contest between Vice President Al Gore and Texas Gov. George W. Bush, prices that remain high could prove to be a pivotal factor in the election, analysts say.

So with a gallon averaging just over $ 2 in Milwaukee and $ 2.13 in Chicago--but with many drivers paying $ 2.29 and $ 2.39--compared with $ 1.63 nationwide, both candidates have begun assigning blame.

Like during the Arab oil embargo of 1973 and the gas crunch of 1979, the Democrats, led by Gore, are hinting at possible price-gouging on the part of the Republican-friendly oil industry. They asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate and are reminding almost anyone who will listen that the Texas governor is a former oilman himself and has raised millions from friends in the oil industry.

Bush and the Republicans, meanwhile, are blaming the Clinton administration's energy policy and myriad environmental regulations, including a mandate that requires a cleaner-burning blend of gas and corn-based ethanol in Midwest cities such as Chicago and Milwaukee.

Although Bush has remained relatively cautious in his rhetoric, Gore has been more direct, saying the extreme price differences "suggest that big oil is gouging American consumers."

No wonder, analysts say: Gore has the most to lose.

"This is manna from heaven for the Republican Party," said Bruce Cain, director of the Institute for Governmental Studies at UC Berkeley. "This is the wedge they need to get into the economic issue--something to point out that things are not perfect with the economy. Forty-two dollars to fill up a tank is a good place to start. And the fact that it's happening in the Midwest, which is being viewed as ground zero in this race, could be a serious problem for the Democrats."

Asking voters across the country, "Are you better off now than you were eight years ago?" Gore has campaigned heavily on his role in an administration overseeing the greatest economic growth in the nation's history. But across the crucial Midwest this week came signs that might cause voters to hesitate when answering that question.

On Tuesday, Indiana Gov. Frank L. O'Bannon said his state would suspend its 5% gasoline tax beginning July 1. On Wednesday, Gov. George Ryan said Illinois may do the same, saving motorists about 10 cents a gallon.

On Thursday, Therese Heyek of Wilmette paid $ 55.80 for the 24 gallons of regular to fill up her family's Ford Expedition. That was just for getting around town, though. The Heyeks had already canceled their summer vacation.

"We were going to take a trip, driving to St. Louis," the registered Democrat said. "But we just can't afford it with these prices."

At some stations in Chicago and other areas, prices dropped as much as 12 cents a gallon by late Friday and will likely continue to fall, experts say. But they will rise again, many predict, and sooner rather than later.

A study by the independent Congressional Research Service blames about half of the spike in Midwest prices on problems at two oil pipelines in the region, the other half on new federal clean-air regulations mandating reformulated gas that is more difficult to make, especially as refineries transition to the gasoline-ethanol mix.

Many experts agree with oil executives, who say the price hikes are the result not of collusion or malfeasance but of the complex environmental regulations requiring refiners to produce dozens of types of gasoline for different cities and different seasons.

And over the last 20 years, the experts point out, both Democratic and Republican administrations have shaped energy policies heavily dependent on foreign oil and have allowed oil companies to consolidate and increase their influence.

"Sure oil companies are making huge amounts of money, but they are prospering because of policies created by both parties," said Ben Brockwell, editor of the Oil Price Information Service. "We've had a lazy energy policy for over 20 years, and the reason politicians haven't done anything about it is because crude oil has been relatively cheap."

If prices stay high through the election, Bush, despite being from an oil-rich state that benefits when consumers suffer, is likely to gain the most, political analysts believe.

However, if prices drop quickly and precipitously and the Clinton administration is viewed as having reined them in, the vice president may benefit, whether or not he influenced the decline, said Stuart Rothenberg, editor of the Rothenberg Political Report.

Regardless of who wins in November, however, the next president is likely to face serious price fluctuations in everything from gas to diesel to heating oil.

Back at the Amoco, Heyek said that despite heading into a vacationless summer, it wasn't today's gas prices that most concerned her.

"I'm pessimistic about what will happen after the election," she said. "They're doing all they can to stem this now, but I wonder about after November."



Rising Midwest Gas Prices

Gasoline prices in the Midwest have soared, as they have everywhere, but they have now surpassed California and national averages.



*

Prices for a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline, Jan. 3-June 19

Source: U.S. Dept. of Energy, Energy Information Administration

GRAPHIC: GRAPHIC: Rising Midwest Gas Prices, ROB HERNANDEZ / Los Angeles Times

LOAD-DATE: June 24, 2000




Previous Document Document 141 of 370. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: rising AND gas prices
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.