Back to National Journal
1 of 7 results      | Next Story | Back to Results List

11-06-1999

RESOURCES: Cold Wind From Hill Shakes Clinton's Trees

When members of Congress start quoting the Magna Carta, you know they're
really mad. And when they thrash "King William" Clinton and his
"courtiers," as though they were aggrieved barons demanding
their feudal rights, it's time to don the battle armor.

President Clinton won wide praise from editorial writers and environmentalists last month when, recalling the conservation legacy of President Theodore Roosevelt, he announced that the U.S. Forest Service would move to protect the remaining 40 million acres of federal forestland that still is undeveloped and roadless. Then a cold wind begin blowing in from the West, where lawmakers see public lands as unavailable economic opportunities.

Western Republicans led the charge as House and Senate committees began examining the Clinton proposal on Nov. 2 and Nov. 3. They accused the President of ducking a confrontation with Congress by taking the regulatory route to achieve his goal. "We're used to political fights when it comes to public lands," said Sen. Conrad Burns, R-Mont. "Don't deny us that."

So began the yelling and the finger-pointing; the table-banging and the swearing; the rich rhetoric of the Magna Carta and the Founding Fathers that is called congressional oversight.

"I'm going to be damn blunt: I believe you and the Administration chose a political route," Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Forests and Public Land Management Subcommittee, told Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman on Nov. 2. Craig piled on the medieval imagery, comparing Clinton to William the Conqueror. He then switched allusions to compare the forest initiative to an attempt to "assist with Prince Albert's ascension to the throne."

Sen. Frank Murkowski, R-Alaska, the chairman of the full committee, took a more modern approach: tell it to the judge. He said that any effort to apply the Clinton plan to his home state would violate the Alaska National Interest Land Conservation Act and could be challenged in court.

On Nov. 3, the House Resources Committee brushed up on its history, too. Rep. Helen Chenoweth-Hage, R-Idaho, quoted from a 1901 speech by Roosevelt. Committee Chairman Don Young, R-Alaska, submitted a statement citing passages from the 1907 writings of the first chief U.S. forester, Gifford Pinchot. And Rep. Barbara Cubin, R-Wyo., read from the U.S. Constitution.

Glickman noted that the government placed a moratorium on road-building in federal forestland early this year, after Forest Service officials complained that with appropriations slashed, they weren't able to maintain existing roads, which now have an $8.4 billion maintenance backlog.

But congressional critics saw things from a different historical perspective. Said Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah: "Robin Hood and his gang enjoyed more freedom in Sherwood Forest than our citizens have on public land."

Robert Ourlain National Journal
1 of 7 results      | Next Story | Back to Results List