Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: Roadless Areas

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 63 of 110. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The Columbus Dispatch  
The Columbus Dispatch

February 13,2000, Sunday

SECTION: EDITORIAL & COMMENT, Pg. 2B

LENGTH: 198 words

HEADLINE: COMMERCIAL LOGGERS DON'T BELONG IN NATIONAL FORESTS

BODY:


Clinton's announcement of a new roadless-area policy for national forests is a tremendous victory for preserving America's forests and should be applauded. However, we should not be under the impression that the nation's forest system is fully protected yet. Logging still greatly threatens our nation's federal forest lands. For instance, the Quincy Library Group Forest Recovery Act of 1998 more than doubles commercial timber extraction over two national forests in the northern Sierra Nevada.

Top scientists in the region have said the plan is likely to drive to local extinction sensitive species such as the northern goshawk and Pacific fisher, although no logging in roadless areas or strictly defined "old growth'' areas will occur.

The president and Congress should listen to the 75 percent of Americans who don't want any commercial-resource extraction from our national forests. They should protect our public lands from all destructive commercial logging by endorsing the bill that does exactly this, House Resolution 1396, the National Forest Protection and Restoration Act.

David Pearson, public lands coordinator

Buckeye Forest Council

Chillicothe, Ohio

GRAPHIC: Phot

LOAD-DATE: February 14, 2000




Previous Document Document 63 of 110. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: Roadless Areas
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.