Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: Roadless Areas

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 25 of 110. Next Document

Copyright 2000 Denver Publishing Company  
DENVER ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS

August 2, 2000, Wednesday

SECTION: Local; Ed. Final; Pg. 30A

LENGTH: 385 words

HEADLINE: BILLS WOULD PROTECT LAND, CUT FIRE DANGER

BYLINE: By Kevin McCullen, News Staff Writer

BODY:


Nearly 80,000 acres of roadless areas and the mountain backdrop west of Rocky Flats would be protected under one of two bills introduced by Rep. Mark Udall last week.

A second bill, co-sponsored by Rep. Joel Hefley, R-Colorado, would create a program to reduce fire danger in mountains adjoining urban areas through thinning and clearing of trees and prescribed burns, said Udall, a Boulder Democrat.

Udall said Tuesday that his bill, called the Northern Front Range Roadless Area and Mountain Backdrop Protection Act, would include roadless areas in the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest and would be confined to his Second Congressional District. But Udall said he plans to ask Republican Reps. Bob Schaffer and Scott McInnis if they want to include areas of their districts in the bill, which would require the Forest Service to forward a recommendation to Congress in three years on which lands could be recommended for wilderness or managed for other functions.

A second provision of the Mountain Backdrop Protection Act would require the Forest Service to study the ownership patterns of land west of Rocky Flats to determine what might be developed and what could be preserved as wildlife habitat or for scenic views. The backdrop study would be finished in one year.

The concerns of constituents about growth encouraged Udall to sponsor the bill, he said.

"Future generations will judge us harshly if we do not set aside lands from development," Udall said.

All Forest Service lands in the proposed Northern Front Range Roadless Area would be managed as wilderness during the three years of the study, Udall said. Timber harvesting and motorized vehicles would be prohibited in the study area, but grazing would continue.

The fire protection bill would seek an appropriation of up to $5 million annually for fire mitigation work in "urban-interface" mountain areas where homes dot the forest.

State and local agencies would work with landowners and the Forest Service to reduce hazards, said Doug Young, Udall's natural resource staff aide. But the bill would also prohibit the thinning of a healthy tree larger than 12 inches in diameter.

The proposed wild fire hazard reduction bill would encompass high-risk areas throughout the state, Udall said.





NOTES:
Mile High Suburbs Page

LOAD-DATE: August 3, 2000




Previous Document Document 25 of 110. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: Roadless Areas
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.