home | join ama | contact us
Go back to the news releases index
December 9, 1999 Preservationists target off-highway vehicles PICKERINGTON, Ohio -- Preservationists have launched a new attack on the motorcyclists and other users of off-highway vehicles (OHVs) on U.S. Forest Service land -- a move that could ultimately shut down motorized trails nationwide, the American Motorcyclist Association (AMA) reports. A coalition of more than 90 preservation groups, led by The Wilderness Society and the Wildlands Center for Preventing Roads, announced Dec. 7 it would file a formal rule-making petition with the U.S. Forest Service to put strict controls on motorized vehicles in forest land. The petition would trigger a formal process that requires the Forest Service to respond. "This petition is full of land mines for the Forest Service and for OHV users of forest land," said Robert Rasor, AMA executive vice president and head of the Government Relations Department. "It would require the Forest Service and OHV users to jump through so many hoops that few, if any, motorized trails would exist." The petition is the latest in a series of assaults on off-highway motorcycle, all-terrain vehicle (ATV) and other OHV use of public land. On October 13, President Clinton launched a land-closure initiative that could ban OHVs from almost 80 million acres of forest land nationwide. Two weeks later, radical preservationists in Utah filed a federal lawsuit seeking to shut down 10 million acres of land controlled by the federal Bureau of Land Management. "This latest action is part of an orchestrated effort by radical preservationists to bypass Congress and fast-track their agenda related to public land," Rasor said. "They prefer lawsuits and federal rule-making over public discussion, debate and decision-making in Congress to accomplish their goals." This new petition calls on the Forest Service to:
"Among other things, this petition is yet another attempt to bypass the Federal Wilderness Act and impose a `wilderness' designation on forest land without going through Congress," Rasor said. "The congressional process allows for open debate and a congressional vote on which lands deserve a `wilderness' designation."
| GO TO TOP | |