Wilderness and Roadless
Areas |
|
Some of Colorado's most spectacular scenery is found in the White
River National Forest (NF). One of the most popular forests in the
country for recreation, the White River NF spans central Colorado
along the I-70 corridor. Here resides the nation's largest elk herd,
along with some of the best habitat in the state for lynx,
wolverine, goshawk, and eagles. The forest also has a wealth of
undeveloped roadless lands that provide stunning scenery, clean
drinking water, prime wildlife habitat, and outstanding backcountry
recreation.
WHAT'S AT
STAKE
The White River NF is redoing its management plan, which will
determine how its 2.2 million acres will be managed for the next 15
years. At stake are up to 300,000 acres that the Forest Service has
found eligible to be added to the National Wilderness Preservation
System (NWPS), wildlands surrounding 12 ski resorts, the integrity
of wildlife habitats, quality of experience for nonmotorized
recreationists in the backcountry, and the ecological health of the
forest itself.
"Not only are the unique and spectacular lands of the White River
NF at stake, but if the Forest Service fails to recommend additional
wilderness protection or backs down from its reasonable proposals to
more responsibly manage unchecked and environmentally damaging
recreation, it will set back national forest management across the
country," said Michael Francis, director of the TWS National Forests
Program.
THREATS
Development
Across Colorado's Western Slope, thousands
of acres are lost each year to real estate development, which
sprawls across valley floors up to national forest boundaries. In
addition, with Colorado's booming population and growing recreation
pressure, the White River NF area is at risk of becoming a glorified
outdoor theme park, with myriad major four-season resorts connected
by a spaghetti network of roads and trails.
In its draft plan, the Forest Service has analyzed and considered
several "alternatives" for managing White River NF. One alternative
considered and rejected by the agency is the "Conservation
Alternative," known as Alternative I. This is the best alternative
for protecting wildlife habitat, recommending additional wilderness,
preventing logging in roadless areas, and restricting ski areas to
their current boundaries. Unfortunately, the solution proposed by
the Forest Service, although it takes some significant steps in the
right direction, falls short of these objectives.
Off-Road
Vehicle Recreation
The Forest Service has taken a long, hard
look at the effects of motorized routes and off-road vehicle (ORV)
use and has designed a plan to manage them within the natural limits
of the forest. Specifically, the agency proposes to limit all
nonwinter motorized and mechanized recreation to designated routes
and to close unnecessary or environmentally damaging routes. In
addition, the agency proposes modest restrictions on snowmobile use
to create some "quiet use" areas for backcountry skiers and
snowshoers outside of designated wilderness.
This comprehensive ban on cross-country travel has sparked major
opposition from the ORV community, even though it would provide
ample opportunity for motorized recreation. Agencies such as the
Bureau of Land Management, as well as other national forests, are
watching to see if the White River NF will back down under pressure
or become a pioneer in the reasonable management of ORVs.
Wildlands Protection
Protecting wildlands is essential
to maintaining the ecological integrity of the White River NF. The
Forest Service has identified 300,000 acres on the forest as
eligible for wilderness designation, yet is proposing wilderness
protection for only 16 percent of these eligible acres. As the plan
stands now, more than half of the existing roadless areas in the
forest will be vulnerable to logging and road building over the next
15 years. The Wilderness Society believes that the Forest Service
should protect all 300,000 eligible acres. Such protections would
fulfill critical environmental needs by increasing the size of core
protected wildlife areas, maintaining the forested connections
between existing wilderness areas, and increasing the diversity of
ecosystem types protected in the NWPS.
Industrial Recreation
The ski industry is being driven
by large corporations whose motive for expanding resorts is real
estate development on adjacent private lands to increase their
profit margin, rather than to provide additional public skiing
opportunities. In Colorado, these resort expansions are destroying
wildlife habitat and are creating devastating off-site impacts on
the quality of life in resort communities.
They promote sprawl, traffic congestion, and unaffordable housing
prices for long time residents and resort service workers, who
routinely commute 50 to 75 miles each way to work. On the White
River NF, the Forest Service has for the first time proposed to
limit the growth of existing ski areas to within their current
permit boundaries. Although this proposal will allow modest growth,
it has triggered massive opposition from the ski industry. Whether
the Forest Service stands firm will have major implications for our
National Forest System.
Ecological Health
In its draft plan, the Forest Service
is advocating an aggressive approach to managing the forest. Rather
than allow natural processes, such as fire, to prevail in
backcountry lands away from human settlement, the agency is
proposing that more than 60 percent of the forest be zoned for
logging as a mechanism for maintaining "forest health" and enhancing
wildlife habitat. The Wilderness Society favors a more
scientifically based approach that uses natural ecological
processes.
VOICE OF THE LAND
"The quality of life we all agree we must preserve for our
children is not easy to maintain. That preservation requires strong
will, passion, persistence, and a willingness to stand up in the
face of opposition. Some decisions require compromise. Our fragile
mountain forest lands cannot survive more compromise. The last 150
years of human-wilderness interaction have compromised our mountains
enough. It is time to make decisions for wise, protective
management." -Dorothea Farris, Pitkin County commissioner Dorothea
Farris, a longtime Colorado resident, is a commissioner for Pitkin
County in central Colorado and has spent a lifetime advocating for
the environment, education, and the cultural arts.
FACTS
- The White River National Forest encompasses two and
one-quarter million acres of Colorado's central mountains.
- White River National Forest ranks as one of the top five
Forests nationwide for total recreation use.
- The elevation of the White River National Forest ranges
from 5,000 to 14,000 feet.
|
RECOMMENDATION
The Wilderness Society urges the Forest Service to stand firm in
its plan to manage ORV use and ski resorts in a more sustainable
manner and to do more to protect potential wilderness and roadless
lands. We support Alternative I as the best proposal to reach these
goals. The White River has become a bellwether for forest management
nationally, and the Forest Service needs to set a high standard
here.
PUBLIC ACTION
Although the official public comment period on the draft plan
ended May 9, 2000, concerned citizens should continue to contact
Regional Forester Lyle Laverty and urge him to ensure that the final
plan for the White River NF:
- protects more lands as recommended wilderness
- limits motorized and mechanized use to designated routes and
closes ecologically damaging and unnecessary routes
- limits ski area growth to within current permit boundaries
- relies on natural ecological processes rather than logging to
maintain forest health and wildlife habitat
Direct letters
to:
Lyle Laverty, Regional Forester
Region 2, U.S. Forest
Service
P.O. Box 25127
Lakewood, CO 80225
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Suzanne Jones
TWS Assistant Regional Director, Four Corners
Region
Phone: (303) 650-5818, ext. 102
E-mail: suzanne_jones@tws.org
Michael Francis
TWS Director, National Forest
Program
Phone: (202) 429-2662
E-mail: michael_francis@tws.org