Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: United Airlines w/5 US Airways w/10 Merger

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 257 of 279. Next Document

Copyright 2000 Times Mirror Company  
Los Angeles Times

 View Related Topics 

May 25, 2000, Thursday, Home Edition

SECTION: Business; Part C; Page 1; Financial Desk

LENGTH: 1452 words

HEADLINE: NEWS ANALYSIS; 
2ND TIME AROUND FOR UNITED-US AIR; 
AIRLINES: PLANNED MERGER WILL FACE SAME LABOR CONCERNS THAT THWARTED A DEAL IN 1995. THAT'S ON TOP OF ANTITRUST HURDLES.

BYLINE: JAMES F. PELTZ, TIMES STAFF WRITER 


BODY:
Anyone analyzing whether United Airlines' parent, UAL Corp., can actually complete a planned $ 4.3-billion buyout of smaller rival US Airways Group Inc., a proposal the carriers confirmed Wednesday, might do well to revisit what happened between the two airlines 4 1/2 years ago.

UAL was looking to buy US Airways at that time, too, but UAL's then-chairman, Gerald Greenwald, got an earful from United's powerful labor force that they wouldn't back the deal. So it was scrapped.

Now, UAL's new chief executive, James Goodwin, is trying again to acquire US Airways and make United--already the world's biggest airline--into an industry behemoth with more than 6,500 daily flights worldwide, more than 145,000 employees and $ 27 billion in annual revenue.

But once again, labor could be the biggest stumbling block to completing the deal, even more so than the antitrust concerns that undoubtedly will be raised by U.S. and foreign airline regulators, or the possibility of competing offers. In fact, the enormous complexity of melding two airlines' employees--who typically are unionized and very concerned about keeping their seniority, wage levels and other benefits intact within the merged carrier--is the main reason airline combinations seldom occur.

American Airlines was hobbled in early 1999 when, after buying tiny Reno Air, angry American pilots staged a weeklong sickout in protest.

The issue is even more prominent at UAL, because the pilots and other employee groups own a combined 55% of the company's stock and have seats on UAL's board of directors.

"The pilots are the ones who will determine whether or not this thing works," said Terry Trippler, who runs 1Travel.com, a Minneapolis-based travel site that focuses on air fares.

"Now remember, we're talking about the cockpit; we're talking about big egos here," he said. A key sticking point, he added, will be how the issue of pilots' seniority is handled in a combined company.

So while some analysts suggest that a UAL-US Airways marriage could open the door to a wave of additional airline mergers, or that all this consolidation could lead to higher ticket prices for travelers, all of that speculation might be premature until it becomes clear that the employees of United and US Airways are on board with this merger.

Yet already labor's unease is apparent. No sooner had UAL and US Airways announced their deal than the Air Line Pilots Assn., the union representing United's 10,000 pilots, expressed its "strong concerns" about the deal. And it chastised UAL for inking the pact before "reaching full agreement with the United pilot group on all issues."

US Airways, an amalgam of airlines merged together in the 1980s, also has had its share of labor strife, although within the last year it has signed new contracts with its mechanics and flight attendants.

The antitrust issues, meantime, are not small, by any means. Travel experts and others criticized the deal on two main grounds: That ticket prices undoubtedly would go up because there are already only about 10 major U.S. airlines, and that any strike or work stoppage at such an enormous airline--the combined carriers would have hub airports at eight major cities, including Los Angeles--would severely affect not only the U.S. travel system but the whole economy.

"Airline managements today are not concerned with the consumer as much as they're concerned with their damned stock price," said Michael Boyd, who heads Boyd Group, an aviation-consulting firm in Evergreen, Colo. "There would be fewer options, less competition," and ultimately the merger would be "to the detriment of the consumer," he said.

"We're going to eliminate an airline and, if we have reduced competition and prices do not go up, it will be the first time in history that that will happen in the free-enterprise system," Trippler said. Plus, a strike "could really cripple the country," he said.

Analysts also noted that speculation is mounting that Northwest Airlines and Continental Airlines might merge if this deal goes through. Northwest and Continental already have a far-flung alliance whereby Northwest owns a 51% voting stake in Continental.

Yet the Justice Department sued those two airlines 18 months ago on grounds that the pact was anti-competitive, although the agency did not block the deal from going forward by seeking a restraining order or injunction.

Regardless, analysts said the fact that the Justice Department is still reviewing that alliance likely means that actual mergers between UAL-US Airways, Continental and Northwest or any other big airline combinations might not pass muster.

Jennifer Rose, spokeswoman for the Justice Department's antitrust division in Washington, said: "We're aware of the transaction and we will review it closely."

Wall Street also had concerns about the merger. Amid suggestions that UAL is paying too much for US Airways with its cash offer of $ 60 a share, UAL's stock plunged $ 7.19 a share on Wednesday to $ 53.19.

US Airways' shares soared $ 22.69 to $ 49 a share. But its close well below UAL's $ 60 offer likely reflected investors' expectation that the deal's closing is at best months away. It may also indicate that not everyone on Wall Street sees a bidding war breaking out for US Airways.

United, based in Elk Grove Village, Ill., has major hubs not only in Los Angeles but in San Francisco, Chicago, Denver and Washington. US Airways, based in Arlington, Va., has hubs in Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and Charlotte, N.C.

With more than 2,300 flights a day, United flies more than 570 jets to more than 130 destinations in the United States and 25 other countries. US Airways and its regional carrier US Airways Express offer more than 4,100 flights daily in 38 states and 12 countries.

One of the key assets that UAL sees in the deal is US Airways heavy concentration of routes in the Northeast and mid-Atlantic states, including US Airways' Shuttle that links New York, Washington and Boston.

Those routes, combined with United's enormous service--particularly on transcontinental routes--would make the enlarged United an aviation powerhouse that would be far larger than the current No. 2 U.S. airline, AMR Corp.'s American Airlines.

AMR and Delta Air Lines, in fact, are widely expected to weigh counteroffers for US Airways or consider mergers of their own to stay competitive with United. Indeed, AMR also thought about buying US Airways in 1995 when UAL was weighing the move.

"Doing nothing is not a tenable option for American and Delta," PaineWebber Inc. analyst Samuel Buttrick maintained in a new report.

UAL's $ 60-a-share offer, more than double US Airways' Tuesday close of $ 26.31 a share, clearly was aimed at discouraging counter bids.

"They had to go in with a knockout punch right away," said Paul McManus, a senior vice president at money manager Independence Investment Associates Inc. (UAL also plans to assume $ 7.3 billion of US Airways' debt and aircraft-lease obligations.)

Despite all of these concerns, UAL's Goodwin and his counterpart at US Airways, Chairman Stephen Wolf, said the combination's assets would more than offset any problems.

The executives noted at a news conference that the "new" United would offer one-airline service between more than 560 new pairs of cities, reduce check-in hassles and baggage transfers, and give both airlines' frequent-flier-mileage participants more places to fly.

In clear recognition of competitive concerns, United promised to freeze U.S. point-to-point fares for two years, with exceptions for fuel costs and inflation. The carrier also vowed not to cut travel agents' base commissions on U.S. flights again for two years.



*

Times wire services were used in compiling this report.



The Less-Competitive Skies

The merger of United Airlines, the nation's largest airline, with US Airways, the sixth-largest, would create a company with more than $ 25 billion in annual revenue. The combined carrier would account for about 1 in 3 seats on domestic flights and could stifle competition, according to some industry experts.

Market Share (in billions of revenue passenger miles*)

United: 125.4

American: 111.9

Delta: 104.7

Northwest: 741.

Continental: 58.0

U.S. Airways: 41.5

Southwest: 36.5

Trans World: 26.0

America West: 17.7

Alaska: 11.8

* Miles flown by paying passengers.

United Airlines

Monthly closes and latest:

Wednesday:

$ 53.19,

down $ 7.19

US Airways

Monthly closes and latest:

Wednesday:

$ 49.00,

up $ 22.69

Sources: Air Transport Assn., Aviation Daily, GKMG, Associated Press

GRAPHIC: PHOTO: (no caption) PHOTOGRAPHER: Agene Free-Presse

LOAD-DATE: May 25, 2000




Previous Document Document 257 of 279. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: United Airlines w/5 US Airways w/10 Merger
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.