Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: United Airlines w/5 US Airways w/10 Merger

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 222 of 279. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company  
The New York Times

 View Related Topics 

May 31, 2000, Wednesday, Late Edition - Final

SECTION: Section C; Page 2; Column 5; Business/Financial Desk 

LENGTH: 796 words

HEADLINE: A Collapse of Airlines' Deal Would Not Be Too Painful

BYLINE:  By LAURENCE ZUCKERMAN 

BODY:
Since last week, leaders at the UAL Corporation, parent of United Airlines, and US Airways have said repeatedly that they are committed to seeing their controversial $4.3 billion merger through to completion. But it turns out that it would not be very taxing for either side to walk away from the deal.

According to a copy of the merger agreement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission yesterday, US Airways would have to pay $160 million to UAL if it breached the contract, while UAL would be forced to pay $50 million to US Airways if it backed out of the deal. In addition, either company can terminate the agreement if the merger is not completed by Dec. 31. The deal faces many regulatory hurdles in Washington, making it likely there will be a delay.

Such financial bounds appear rather loose when compared with other recent deals like America Online's proposed $165 billion merger with Time Warner Inc. In that case, AOL must pay Time Warner $5.4 billion if it pulls out, while Time Warner is obligated to pay America Online $3.7 billion if it walks away. There is also a second multibillion-dollar breakup penalty if stockholders at either company reject the deal.

Merger experts said that breakup fees normally represented a percentage of each company's equity and that the higher fees in the case of the AOL-Time Warner merger merely reflected the higher values of those two companies.

But one week after the UAL-US Airways deal was first disclosed many in the airline industry wonder if the deal will ever be completed. Most of the speculation centers on the next wave of merger announcements that many analysts said were sure to come and would make regulators and Congress reluctant to approve a merger between the country's largest airline -- UAL -- and its sixth largest, US Airways. At the top of the list are a possible deal between the AMR Corporation, parent of American Airlines, and Northwest Airlines, and a merger of Delta Airlines and Continental Airlines.

Richard Blumenthal, the Connecticut attorney general, announced yesterday that he would join federal authorities and officials in New York, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts in taking a hard look at the UAL-US Airways deal. "The merger of United and US Air would create an airborne behemoth with huge implications for our consumers and economy," he said. UAL and US Airways hope to win over state and federal regulators by selling most of the US Airways operations at Ronald Reagan National Airport in Washington to DC Air, a new airline being formed by Robert L. Johnson, founder of Black Entertainment Television and a US Airways board member.

DC Air will receive seven gates at Reagan National and 222 coveted takeoff and landing slots at the airport, where the number of daily flights is limited, for $141.2 million, according to the memorandum of understanding between Mr. Johnson and UAL and US Airways that was also filed with the S.E.C. yesterday.

In addition, UAL has agreed to lease maintenance sites, jets and ticket counters to the fledgling airline. The memorandum also states that "United will provide interim employees for up to six months to staff 'open' positions, while DC Air hires and trains, if needed, at United's cost."

UAL and US Airways executives said that DC air would quickly become a strong competitor with the combined United-US Airways, but others are not so sure. An analysis by Samuel C. Buttrick, an airline analyst at PaineWebber, found that the number of airplane seats flown from Reagan National would decrease by 15 percent after DC Air began operating compared with what United and US Airways each fly today.

"It would appear that there will be fewer seats at the outset rather than more seats," Mr. Buttrick said. "It is certainly hard to see how that is good for the consumer."

He added that DC Air could expand its service from Reagan National over time but that would not be easy given the restrictions at the airport. Another hurdle facing the deal is the approval of employees at both airlines. The leadership of the union representing United's 10,000 pilots, who own about a quarter of UAL's stock, will begin three days of meetings in Chicago today to discuss the deal. James E. Goodwin, UAL's chief executive, is scheduled to address the group this afternoon.

As Mr. Goodwin has previously stated, the merger agreement guarantees that there will be no layoffs at the combined airlines for two years. Nevertheless, it will be a tough audience. Last week, Rick Dubinsky, the chairman of the United union's master executive council who is also on UAL's board, criticized Mr. Goodwin for pursuing the merger before first sealing a new contract with the pilots. Those talks are expected to go on for months.
        http://www.nytimes.com

LOAD-DATE: May 31, 2000




Previous Document Document 222 of 279. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: United Airlines w/5 US Airways w/10 Merger
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.