I WASHINGTON -- The
sophisticated arena of Internet taxation issues is beginning to
resemble a playground rumble.
Talk about whether to tax purchases on
the Internet is getting testy, and Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt is in the
middle of the fray.
On Wednesday, fellow Republicans threw
several roadblocks in front of Leavitt's drive to help states
collect tax on sales over the Internet -- and even accused Leavitt's
helpers of clumsily trying to spy on them.
A flurry of actions this week on the
issue show players in the Internet issue puffing their chests and
drawing lines in the sand in preparation for a meeting in San
Francisco next month where a commission will gather to debate
whether Internet sales should be taxed.
On Wednesday, House Budget Committee
Chairman John Kasich, R-Ohio, introduced a bill to ban such
taxes.
Virginia Gov. James Gilmore, chairman of
a commission reviewing e-commerce issues for Congress, has also
formally opposed them.
Leavitt also sits on the commission and
has emerged as a leader among his peers. Back home in Utah, he
stopped short of name-calling on the no-tax proposals but said
taxation has to be fair.
Take a visit to the grocery store,
Leavitt said. Under proposals like Kasich's and Gilmore's, you'd
have three checkout stands; two would require Sam Shopper to pay
sales tax and one would not.
"It makes no sense," Leavitt said. "No
one likes taxes, but if we're going to have them, they should be
fair."
Leavitt said he will formally announce
his own proposal to allow such taxes next week before the National
Press Club in Washington.
His plan will detail how a multi-state
retailer like Wal-Mart could have taxes calculated and collected by
a "trusted" third-party. "The system would be dramatically
simplified, and entirely voluntary" he said.
His proposal was developed with support
of seven state and local government organizations, he said.
Meanwhile, a national coalition of
anti-tax groups called a press conference Wednesday to endorse
Kasich and Gilmore's stands -- and preview their own presentation to
the e-commerce commission in opposition to Internet sales
taxes.
One of the groups, Americans for Tax
Reform, said they caught aides to Leavitt in a silly attempt to spy
on them.
Ron Nehring, director of national
campaigns for that group, said a woman left a message on his phone
Tuesday claiming to be a George Washington University student who
was researching a paper on Leavitt.
But she left a call-back number
1-202-624-5301 -- which Nehring said he recognized as a number for
the National Governors Association, of which Leavitt is chairman
this year.
When he called her back, he said she
again claimed to be a student writing a paper about Leavitt -- and
asked if she could attend the group's press conference on
Wednesday.
"When I asked if she worked for the NGA,
she said no," Nehring said. "Then she coughed for about 30 seconds
and there was a long pause. . . . I told her to tell the people who
told her to call that the press conference is for credentialed media
only. She said, 'OK.' She didn't say anything like, 'No I really am
a student.' "
Is Leavitt sending out spies?
"The answer is no," said Vicki Varela,
Leavitt's deputy chief of staff in Utah. "That's not the way the
governor handles himself."
With no knowledge of the incident, she
said she can't comment on the specific allegations. "The governor is
known for his forthrightness and his directness and that's how he
does his business."
Leavitt has long argued that residents
are supposed to pay "sales and use" tax on all items they buy.
However, they rarely report and pay it for items they buy from
out-of-state companies via the Internet or through mail-order
catalogs.
He says that puts traditional "Main
Street" businesses at a disadvantage, because they by law must
collect sales tax -- making items they sell more expensive overall.
Leavitt has advocated forming a system to allow national collection
of sales tax from Internet retailers, and then redistribute it to
states.
But Kasich said Wednesday, "The explosive
growth of e-commerce represents nothing short of a second Industrial
Revolution. The biggest threat to this growth is the possibility of
government treating the Internet like a cash cow."
"Despite this growth, e-commerce is still
in its infancy," he added. "It needs to be nurtured by
entrepreneurs, not choked off by government."
Meanwhile, Gilmore said Tuesday as he
opposed Internet taxes that "America must enhance the Internet and
the new economy by adopting pro-growth tax policies and changing the
way government does business."
But Leavitt says Gilmore is really
suggesting the federal government pre-empt ability of state and
local governments to do their jobs on the Internet tax issue. "I
think that is a serious mistake."
And the e-Freedom Coalition -- a group of
20 conservative and anti-tax groups opposing Internet sales taxes --
called Wednesday to prevent states from exporting "their tax
collecting regimes to other states."
Eric Schlect, with the National Taxpayers
Union, said at the coalition's press conference, "Governments are
not starved for revenues, they're just hungry for more cash
cows."
"Taxing the Internet isn't about helping
Main Street, or promoting tax equity, or funding essential
services," he said. "It's about greed. The e-Freedom Coalition has a
better plan that helps consumers, not
bureaucrats." |