|
|
Wednesday,
April 18, 2001
|
|
|
4/12/00
IMRA Member Wal-Mart Encourages Level Playing Field for
State Sales Tax Collections
ARLINGTON, VA, April
12, 2000--David Bullington, Vice President of Taxes for
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., testified today on behalf of the
International Mass Retail Association (IMRA) and the e-Fairness
Coalition (a coalition of retail and retail estate interests)
before the Senate Commerce Committee on the need to achieve a
“level playing field” on sales-tax collection duties for any
product seller, whether brick-and-mortar or Internet/direct mail.
In his testimony, Bullington told the panel--whose
Chairman, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), has introduced legislation that
would extend a current moratorium on new or discriminatory
Internet taxes for five more years--that Congress should not
extend the moratorium, which expires in October 2001, without
resolving the sales tax collection issue. The moratorium does not
apply to normal sales and use taxes.
Bullington stressed
the unfairness of the present situation, in which large and small
bricks-and-mortar retailers must collect sales taxes on most
in-store sales, while their Internet and other remote-selling
counterparts do not. He also reminded the Committee that the
recently concluded Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce did
not include any retailers among its 19 members, and pointed out
that this lack of retail representation was a principal reason
that the Commission was unable to resolve the sales tax collection
issue.
Calling simplification of current state sales tax
laws the key to resolving the issue, Bullington stated that
Congress could fairly require Internet and other remote sellers to
collect and remit sales or use taxes on all taxable
business-to-consumer sales. He offered some suggestions on how
simplification might reasonably be achieved by reforming and
making more uniform state sales taxes.
Bullington also
emphasized the consequences of extending the current moratorium
without resolving the sales tax collection issue. By perpetuating
the status quo, he said, Congress would be giving Internet and
other remote retailers a de facto tax subsidy and make it
much more difficult to resolve the issue in the future.
Internet retailers do not need, nor should they be given,
tax preference compared to brick-and-mortar retailers. Tax
preferences are bad tax policy and bad economic policy, and
Congress must take this opportunity to bring this tax subsidy to
an end, Bullington said.
He concluded his remarks with a
direct appeal to Committee Chairman McCain not to give Internet
retailers preferential treatment. Internet commerce will continue
to flourish as more and more traditional retailers take advantage
of it, he said, but it shouldn’t be propped up at the expense of
others.
IMRA President Robert J. Verdisco noted that,
“Achieving a level playing field for all sellers is a matter of
basic fairness and a top priority for IMRA. It makes no economic
or business sense for government tax policy--whether intentionally
or inadvertently--skewing customers’ buying decisions or favoring
some business competitors over others.”
###
The
International Mass Retail Association--the world’s leading
alliance of retailers and their product and service suppliers--is
committed to bringing price-competitive value to the world’s
consumers. IMRA improves its members’ businesses by providing
industry research and education, government advocacy, and a unique
forum for its members to establish relationships, solve problems,
and work together for the benefit of the consumer and the mass
retail industry. IMRA represents many of the best-known and most
successful retailers in the world, who operate thousands of stores
worldwide. IMRA equally values among its members hundreds of the
world’s top-tier product and service suppliers, working with their
retailer partners to further the growth of the mass retail
industry.
Return
to Press Release index for April 2000 |
|
|