NGA Home | The Center | Governors | News Room | Site Index | Legislative Update | Bookstore
Topics
Appropriations and Budget
Aviation
Bankruptcy Reform
Child Support Financing
Child Welfare
Clean Water Act
Coastal Zone Management
Crime and Juvenile Justice
Election Reform
Electric Industry Restructuring and Energy Issues
Elementary and Secondary Education
Endangered Species Act
Fatherhood
Federalism, Preemption, and Regulatory Reform
Food Stamps
Health Care Coverage for the Uninsured
Health Insurance Regulation
Indian Gaming
Indian Gaming - Related Tribal-State Issues
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
Minimum Wage
Outer Continental Shelf Revenues
Privacy
Public Pension and Retirement Savings
Sales Tax Simplification
SSBG
State Children's Health Insurance Program
Superfund and Brownfields
Surface Transportation
Taxes and Revenues
Telecommunications
Terrorism
Welfare Reform
02/23/2001
Frequently Asked Questions About the Streamlined Sales Tax Project
Contact: General Inquiries
Office of Public Affairs
Frequently Asked Questions About Governors' Efforts to Simplify the Nation's Sales Taxes

What is the Streamlined Sales Tax Project?

More Info
Glossary
Timeline
Facts and Figures 

The Project is a proactive approach by states, with input from local governments and the private sector, to design, test, and implement a radically simplified sales and use tax system for the 21st century. The goal of the Project is to substantially reduce or eliminate the costs and burdens of sales tax compliance for businesses through a combination of simplified laws and administrative policies and the implementation of a system that would be paid for by states. Project participants embarked on their mission to create a new, improved, and simpler system in February 2000. Reforming sales an use tax policies will provide online and other retailers that do business in multiple states an easier way to calculate, collect, and remit existing use taxes.

What are sales and use taxes?
A sales tax is a levy placed on a good or service when it is purchased from a company that has a physical presence - whether it is a store or distribution center - in the same state as the consumer. When a consumer buys a good or service from a retailer that is outside of his or her state, they pay what's called a use tax.

Why do we need to change existing sales and use tax laws?
America's sales and use tax system, with 7,500 state and local taxing jurisdictions across the nation, is antiquated, terribly complex, and cumbersome to businesses in today's new economy. One of the problems with so many taxing jurisdictions is that they often have different laws or definitions of what is taxable. For example, a marshmallow might be defined as a food in one state, but as a candy - and therefore not taxed - in the next. That arrangement makes it very difficult for online sellers and other "remote" retailers, such as mail order companies, to know, calculate, collect, and remit sales taxes at varying rates based on a customer's location to different state and local governments.

How does the current tax system work?
Currently, 45 states have a sales tax and a complementary use tax. Under current law, retailers that sell to consumers in a state in which they have a physical presence - called nexus - are required to collect and remit sales taxes. Businesses that sell to consumers in states in which they do not have nexus, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled, are not required to collect and remit use taxes. In this case, though, consumers still have the legal responsibility to calculate and pay the use tax directly to their own state. Under the streamlined approach, businesses would assume that responsibility.

Which states are participating in the Streamlined Sales Tax Project?
Click here for map

Thirty-two states are so-called "official" participants. They helped craft and ultimately voted to approve model legislation that states can independently consider and use to simplify their tax codes. They will work together as the Project moves forward. Seven states are participating in an "observer" capacity. Five states do not have sales taxes. Since the Project made the model bill available, 18 states have introduced the legislation, and on March 1, 2001 Wyoming became the first state to adopt streamlined sales tax legislation. 

What have participants accomplished so far?
In September 2000 participants approved a pilot project to test specially designed software that will assume the complete responsibility for determining, collecting, and remitting the use tax owed on a transaction. Four states - Kansas, Michigan, North Carolina, and Wisconsin - awarded contracts to companies to provide the software. On December 22, 2000 the Project approved on a 26-0 vote model legislation that states could use to implement the new system. The model legislation addresses a variety of simplification measures, including coming up with common definitions of what is taxable, creating uniform rules for sourcing, determining exemption processes, figuring out how to deal with bad debt, and establishing a way to finance the system. There is growing momentum in the states to adopt the model legislation (see map above). 

How will the new, simplified system work?
Retailers and states will voluntarily elect to participate. In order to take part, states will be required to adopt authorizing legislation and enact certain simplification measures, including adopting uniform product codes and sourcing rules, developing uniform definitions of state tax laws, creating a central, one-stop registration system, and limiting the frequency local governments can change their tax rates. Under the new system, small and medium sized multistate retailers would be able to use state-certified, specially-designed software at no expense to calculate, collect and remit use taxes for transactions in states in which they do not have a physical presence. Larger businesses like Sears and Wal-Mart would likely ask states to certify their existing tax software.

Didn't Congress pass a law that specifically prohibits states from taxing purchases made on the Internet?
No. The Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA) set no restrictions on whether states can tax sales over the Internet. Instead ITFA only prohibited states and local governments during a three-year moratorium, from October 1, 1998 to October 1, 2001, from adopting new taxes on Internet access charges (like those consumers pay to AOL and other Internet Service Providers).

More on this topic:
Related Links:
More Information
Letters
Testimony
NGA Policy Positions
Congressional Calendar
Legislative Priorities
Previous Congresses
Recent News
April 11, 2001
Education
NGA unveils new database on Extra Learning Opportunities
April 05, 2001
Education
State Leaders, Education Experts Gather to Discuss Standards-Based Education Reform
April 02, 2001
Medical Privacy
Governors Urge Administration to Avoid State Preemption of Medical Privacy Laws
March 20, 2001
Children's Health
NGA Holds Second Policy Academy on Oral Health Care for Children
March 19, 2001
Education
Higher Education Focus of Governors' Roundtable
March 16, 2001
Private Lands Summit
Governors Set Course to Save America's Working Lands
NGA Home | The Center | Governors | News Room | Site Index | Legislative Update | Bookstore
National Governors Association, Hall of States, 444 N. Capitol St., Washington, D.C. 20001-1512
Telephone (202) 624-5300 | webmaster email address: webmaster@nga.org