106th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1875
AN ACT
To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow the application of the
principles of Federal diversity jurisdiction to interstate class actions.
HR 1875 EH
106th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1875
AN ACT
To amend title 28, United States Code, to allow the application of
the principles of Federal diversity jurisdiction to interstate class
actions.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND REFERENCE.
(a) SHORT TITLE- This Act may be cited as the `Interstate Class Action
Jurisdiction Act of 1999'.
(b) REFERENCE- Whenever in this Act reference is made to an amendment to,
or repeal of, a section or other provision, the reference shall be considered
to be made to a section or other provision of title 28, United States Code.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds that--
(1) as recently noted by the United States Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit, interstate class actions are `the paradigm for Federal
diversity jurisdiction because, in a constitutional sense, they implicate
interstate commerce, invite discrimination by a local State, and tend to
attract bias against business enterprises';
(2) most such cases, however, fall outside the scope of current Federal
diversity jurisdiction statutes;
(3) that exclusion is an unintended technicality, inasmuch as those
statutes were enacted by Congress before the rise of the modern class action
and therefore without recognition that interstate class actions typically
are substantial controversies of the type for which diversity jurisdiction
was designed;
(4) Congress is constitutionally empowered to amend the current Federal
diversity jurisdiction statutes to permit most interstate class actions to
be brought in or removed to Federal district courts; and
(5) in order to ensure that interstate class actions are adjudicated in
a fair, consistent, and efficient manner and to correct the unintended,
technical exclusion of such cases from the scope of Federal diversity
jurisdiction, it is appropriate for Congress to amend the Federal diversity
jurisdiction and related statutes to allow more interstate class actions to
be brought in or removed to Federal court.
SEC. 3. JURISDICTION OF DISTRICT COURTS.
(a) EXPANSION OF FEDERAL JURISDICTION- Section 1332 is amended by
redesignating subsections (b), (c), and (d) as subsections (c), (d), and (e),
respectively, and by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
`(b)(1) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil
action which is brought as a class action and in which--
`(A) any member of a proposed plaintiff class is a citizen of a State
different from any defendant;
`(B) any member of a proposed plaintiff class is a foreign state and any
defendant is a citizen of a State; or
`(C) any member of a proposed plaintiff class is a citizen of a State
and any defendant is a citizen or subject of a foreign state.
As used in this paragraph, the term `foreign state' has the meaning given
that term in section 1603(a).
`(2)(A) The district courts shall not exercise jurisdiction over a civil
action described in paragraph (1) if the action is--
`(ii) a limited scope case; or
`(iii) a State action case.
`(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A)--
`(i) the term `intrastate case' means a class action in which the record
indicates that--
`(I) the claims asserted therein will be governed primarily by the
laws of the State in which the action was originally filed; and
`(II) the substantial majority of the members of all proposed
plaintiff classes, and the primary defendants, are citizens of the State
in which the action was originally filed;
`(ii) the term `limited scope case' means a class action in which the
record indicates that all matters in controversy asserted by all members of
all proposed plaintiff classes do not in the aggregate exceed the sum or
value of $1,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs, or a class action in
which the number of members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the
aggregate is less than 100; and
`(iii) the term `State action case' means a class action in which the
primary defendants are States, State officials, or other governmental
entities against whom the district court may be foreclosed from ordering
relief.
`(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any claim concerning a covered
security as that term is defined in section 16(f)(3) of the Securities Act of
1933 and section 28(f)(5)(E) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
`(4) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any class action solely involving a
claim that relates to--
`(A) the internal affairs or governance of a corporation or other form
of business enterprise and that arises under or by virtue of the laws of the
State in which such corporation or business enterprise is incorporated or
organized; or
`(B) the rights, duties (including fiduciary duties), and obligations
relating to or created by or pursuant to any security (as defined under
section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 and the regulations issued
thereunder).'.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Section 1332(c) (as redesignated by this
section) is amended by inserting after `Federal courts' the following:
`pursuant to subsection (a) of this section'.
(c) DETERMINATION OF DIVERSITY- Section 1332, as amended by this section,
is further amended by adding at the end the following:
`(f) For purposes of subsection (b), a member of a proposed class shall be
deemed to be a citizen of a State different from a defendant corporation only
if that member is a citizen of a State different from all States of which the
defendant corporation is deemed a citizen.'.
SEC. 4. REMOVAL OF CLASS ACTIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL- Chapter 89 is amended by adding after section 1452 the
following:
`Sec. 1453. Removal of class actions
`(a) IN GENERAL- A class action may be removed to a district court of the
United States in accordance with this chapter, but without regard to whether
any defendant is a citizen of the State in which the action is brought, except
that such action may be removed--
`(1) by any defendant without the consent of all defendants; or
`(2) by any plaintiff class member who is not a named or representative
class member of the action for which removal is sought, without the consent
of all members of such class.
`(b) WHEN REMOVABLE- This section shall apply to any class action before
or after the entry of any order certifying a class, except that a plaintiff
class member who is not a named or representative class member of the action
may not seek removal of the action before an order certifying a class of which
the plaintiff is a class member has been entered.
`(c) PROCEDURE FOR REMOVAL- The provisions of section 1446(a) relating to
a defendant removing a case shall apply to a plaintiff removing a case under
this section. With respect to the application of subsection (b) of such
section, the requirement relating to the 30-day filing period shall be met if
a plaintiff class member who is not a named or representative class member of
the action for which removal is sought files notice of removal no later than
30 days after receipt by such class member, through service or otherwise, of
the initial written notice of the class action provided at the court's
direction.
`(1) COVERED SECURITIES- This section shall not apply to any claim
concerning a covered security as that term is defined in section 16(f)(3) of
the Securities Act of 1933 and section 28(f)(5)(E) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
`(2) INTERNAL GOVERNANCE OF BUSINESS ENTITIES- This section shall not
apply to any class action solely involving a claim that relates to--
`(A) the internal affairs or governance of a corporation or other form
of business enterprise and that arises under or by virtue of the laws of
the State in which such corporation or business enterprise is incorporated
or organized; or
`(B) the rights, duties (including fiduciary duties), and obligations
relating to or created by or pursuant to any security (as defined under
section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 and the regulations issued
thereunder).'.
(b) REMOVAL LIMITATIONS- Section 1446(b) is amended in the second
sentence--
(1) by inserting `, by exercising due diligence,' after `ascertained';
and
(2) by inserting `(a)' after `section 1332'.
(c) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS- The table of sections for chapter
89 is amended by adding after the item relating to section 1452 the
following:
`1453. Removal of class actions.'.
(d) APPLICATION OF SUBSTANTIVE STATE LAW- Nothing in this section or the
amendments made by this section shall alter the substantive law applicable to
an action to which the amendments made by section 3 of this Act apply.
(e) PROCEDURE AFTER REMOVAL- Section 1447 is amended by adding at the end
the following new subsection:
`(f) If, after removal, the court determines that no aspect of an action
that is subject to its jurisdiction solely under the provisions of section
1332(b) may be maintained as a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, it shall dismiss the action. An action dismissed pursuant
to this subsection may be amended and filed again in a State court, but any
such refiled action may be removed again if it is an action of which the
district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction. In any action
that is dismissed pursuant to this subsection and that is refiled by any of
the named plaintiffs therein in the same State court venue in which the
dismissed action was originally filed, the limitations periods on all
reasserted claims shall be deemed tolled for the period during which the
dismissed class action was pending. The limitations periods on any claims that
were asserted in a class action dismissed pursuant to this subsection that are
subsequently asserted in an individual action shall be deemed tolled for the
period during which the dismissed class action was pending.'.
SEC. 5. APPLICABILITY.
The amendments made by this Act shall apply to any action commenced on or
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 6. GAO STUDY.
The Comptroller General of the United States shall, by not later than 1
year after the date of the enactment of this Act, conduct a study of the
impact of the amendments made by this Act on the workload of the Federal
courts and report to the Congress on the results of the study.
Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 1999.
Attest:
Clerk.
END