September 24, 1999


Select: Clinton Nixes Return of Your Money | Miller Votes Against Raising Milk Prices | Miller Supports Revising Monument Law | Miller Votes to Reign in Class Action Lawsuit Abuse | Coming Up

Clinton Nixes Return of Your Money

On Thursday, President Clinton rejected an opportunity to provide tax relief to the American people. Rather than give Americans the tax relief they deserve, the President opted to keep the money in Washington for wasteful big government spending.

A disappointed Congressman Miller reacted to the President's veto: "It saddens me that the President chose politics over progress, and an opportunity to provide tax relief to the American people. Now that the President has squandered this historic opportunity to put more money in the pockets of the people, and less money in the bureaucratic coffers of Washington, we will have to wait for a Republican president to be elected next year. And it will be worth the wait. We are not willing to trade a downsized tax relief package for the creation of new government programs, and increased spending."

The vetoed tax relief package would have cut taxes across the board by one percent, eliminated the unfair marriage tax, eliminated the death tax, and provided valuable deductions for those who care for a elderly relative in their home.

Miller Votes Against Raising Milk Prices

Congressman Miller opposed legislation this week that would have the effect of rasing milk prices. Miller also supported amendments to further reform the program, including an amendment to eliminate the current pricing system by 2001. The present milk pricing system was invented as a temporary fix during the Great Depression before modern refrigeration, processing, and transportation techniques.

Speaking on the House floor in support of reforming the dairy pricing program, Miller said: "It doesn't matter if the product in question is milk, oranges, wheat, or sugar. Our agricultural programs must be reformed to meet the needs of the 21st Century, not the 19th Century." Miller noted that preserving this archaic program ultimately does "a disservice to taxpayers, consumers, and farmers in all agricultural sectors." Unfortunately, those in favor of the status quo ultimately prevailed over reformers in floor votes on the dairy program.

Miller Supports Revising Monument Law
Congressman Miller supported legislation this week to bring greater local participation and public oversight to presidential actions under the 1906 Antiquities Act. Currently this 90 year old law grants the President power to designate certain unique lands as "national monuments" with little warning to or input from residents of these areas, local and state officials, or the Congress. Designation as a "national monument" places severe restrictions on the use of lands within its boundaries.

Previous presidents had customarily given advance warning and sought public approval when exercising this power. But in 1996, President Clinton generated tremendous controversy when shortly before the election, he declared a huge region of Utah known as the Grand Staircase / Escalante area to be a national monument with no warning or public input. Passage of this week's legislation would insure that a President could not make such a decision affecting 50,000 acres or more, roughly the size of Washington, DC, in the future without first giving local residents and officials, Congress, and the general public warning and a voice in the decision-making process. The bill passed the House by a vote of 408-2.

Miller Votes to Reign in Class Action Lawsuit Abuse
On Thursday, the House passed the Interstate Class Action Jurisdiction Act (H.R. 1875), which will reform the class action lawsuit process. The ability to file a class action suit is an important part of our legal system because it promotes efficiency by combining multiple cases, but outdated rules pertaining to class actions have resulted in abuses of this process. For example, as the result of the adoption of different class action certification standards in the various states, some classes might be certifiable in one state but not another, and some state courts may certify classes before the defendant has even been served with a complaint. Some states have very lax standards for certification, resulting in many minor controversies becoming subject to class action treatment. Trial lawyers have used these inconsistencies to their benefit by picking and choosing where to file their cases, and in some cases, picking and choosing plaintiffs. H.R. 1875 gives federal district courts original jurisdiction over large class action lawsuits where plaintiffs or dependents are from different states. It also clarifies the amount of money needed to get a case into federal court. I believe that this legislation will help improve our legal system, and will create a consistency in class action procedures which is absent but needed. This legislation passed, 222-207, but is subject to a veto threat.
Coming Up
The fiscal year ends on September 30 at midnight. As such, Congress next week will busily finalize and send to the President more appropriations conference reports. Congress will probably have to authorize a continuing resolution to allow government to continue past the end of the fiscal year.