SMALL BUSINESS LIABILITY REFORM ACT OF 1999 -- HON. TIM HOLDEN
(Extensions of Remarks - June 25, 1999)
[Page: E1411]
---
HON. TIM HOLDEN
OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
FRIDAY, JUNE 25, 1999
- Mr. HOLDEN. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to join with my colleagues to
introduce the Small Business Liability Reform Act of 1999. Like the other
pieces of civil justice reform legislation that have recently been enacted
into Federal law, this bill departs from the comprehensive approach that
advocates of broad product liability and tort reform have taken in the past.
Instead, this bill focuses on a few key specific liability issues: the
exposure of very small businesses--those with fewer than 25 full-time
employees--to joint liability for non-economic damages and punitive damages,
and the exposure of retailers, wholesalers, distributors and other
non-manufacturing product sellers to product liability lawsuits for harms they
did not cause.
- Last month, similar legislation was introduced in the other body (S. 1185)
and it is my hope and expectation that our efforts in this body will combine
with the work of our Senate colleagues to enable the Congress to respond
positively and on a bipartisan basis to the concerns we hear year after year
from smaller employers about our civil justice system.
- Let me emphasize, Mr. Speaker, that the bill we introduce today is careful
not to overreach. As I previously indicated, this is a narrowly crafted,
tightly focused bill. The provisions restraining joint liability and punitive
damages do not apply to civil cases that may arise from certain violations of
criminal law or egregious misconduct. Nor do they apply in States that elect
to opt-out with respect to cases brought in State court in which all parties
are citizens of the State. The product seller liability provisions are
strictly confined to product liability actions and protect the ability of
innocent victims of defective products to fully recover damage awards to which
they are entitled.
- Mr. Speaker, the provisions of this legislation have previously won
bipartisan support in both houses of Congress. Although limited in scope,
their enactment into law will reduce unnecessary litigation and wasteful legal
costs and improve the administration of civil justice across this country. I
look forward to working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to pass
this limited but meaningful civil justice reform bill with strong bipartisan
support.
END