Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: class action w/10 reform

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 27 of 37. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Globe Newspaper Company  
The Boston Globe

May 29, 1999, Saturday ,First Edition

SECTION: NATIONAL/FOREIGN; Pg. A10

LENGTH: 454 words

HEADLINE: Alabama hopes new laws fade lure of 'jackpot justice'

BYLINE: Associated Press

BODY:

   MONTGOMERY, Ala. - Alabama, where a family who sued over $1,200 in satellite dish payments won $581 million, is taking steps to curb the big jury verdicts that have given the state a reputation for dispensing "jackpot justice."

Governor Don Siegelman this week signed bills that stop plaintiffs' lawyers from shopping around for friendly juries and judges, and make it tougher to get lawsuits certified as class-actions. A cap on punitive damages - awarded by juries to punish wrongdoing in civil cases - is expected to get final approval from the Legislature and Siegelman on Tuesday.

"I want the word to go forward now that this is not tort hell but it's a heavenly place to do business," said state Senator Lowell Barron, a Democrat.

Alabama earned its reputation from jury awards of $4 million to a doctor who did not like the fact that BMW had not disclosed a repair paint job on his new car, and $581 million to a family who claimed they were overcharged for two satellite dishes.

Lawmakers and business groups who say the mammoth verdicts hurt Alabama's ability to attract companies have been pushing for years for changes in the state's tort laws.

The $581 million verdict, which a judge can still set aside or reduce, was clearly on lawmakers' minds as they approved the reform measures.

"There is no doubt that verdict helped push it over the edge," said Gene Marsh, a University of Alabama law professor.

Previously, insurance companies could be sued in any county in which they did business. That enabled plaintiffs to file their suits in rural counties known for large verdicts and a distrust of big corporations.

The new law limits those suits to the counties where the alleged wrongdoing occurred, where the corporation is based, and where the customer lived at the time.

If the caps on damages are approved, punitive damages will be limited to three times the amount awarded in compensatory damages, or $500,000, whichever is greater. That would means the verdict in the $581 million case would have been no higher than $3.9 million.

Plaintiffs' lawyers have said Alabama's consumer protection laws are so weak that such verdicts have been consumers' only real protection against being cheated.

Greg Breedlove, president of the Alabama Trial Lawyers Association, said that if there is a problem with Alabama's tort laws, the courts can correct it.

For example, he said, the $4 million won in the BMW case was struck down by the Supreme Court and eventually sliced to $50,000.

"The reality is we don't need wholesale changes to our tort law," he said. Instead, he said, the changes "address the perception of that problem."

LOAD-DATE: June 02, 1999




Previous Document Document 27 of 37. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: class action w/10 reform
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.