Copyright 1999 Globe Newspaper Company   
The Boston 
Globe 
May 29, 1999, Saturday ,First Edition 
SECTION: NATIONAL/FOREIGN; Pg. A10 
LENGTH: 454 words 
HEADLINE: 
Alabama hopes new laws fade lure of 'jackpot justice' 
BYLINE: Associated Press 
BODY: 
   MONTGOMERY, Ala. - Alabama, where a family who sued over 
$1,200 in satellite dish payments won $581 
million, is taking steps to curb the big jury verdicts that have given the state 
a reputation for dispensing "jackpot justice." 
Governor Don Siegelman 
this week signed bills that stop plaintiffs' lawyers from shopping around for 
friendly juries and judges, and make it tougher to get lawsuits certified as 
class-actions. A cap on punitive damages - awarded by juries to punish 
wrongdoing in civil cases - is expected to get final approval from the 
Legislature and Siegelman on Tuesday. 
"I want the word to go forward now 
that this is not tort hell but it's a heavenly place to do business," said state 
Senator Lowell Barron, a Democrat. 
Alabama earned its reputation from 
jury awards of $4 million to a doctor who did not like the fact 
that BMW had not disclosed a repair paint job on his new car, and 
$581 million to a family who claimed they were overcharged for 
two satellite dishes. 
Lawmakers and business groups who say the mammoth 
verdicts hurt Alabama's ability to attract companies have been pushing for years 
for changes in the state's tort laws. 
The $581 million 
verdict, which a judge can still set aside or reduce, was clearly on lawmakers' 
minds as they approved the reform measures. 
"There is no doubt that 
verdict helped push it over the edge," said Gene Marsh, a University of Alabama 
law professor. 
Previously, insurance companies could be sued in any 
county in which they did business. That enabled plaintiffs to file their suits 
in rural counties known for large verdicts and a distrust of big corporations. 
The new law limits those suits to the counties where the alleged 
wrongdoing occurred, where the corporation is based, and where the customer 
lived at the time. 
If the caps on damages are approved, punitive damages 
will be limited to three times the amount awarded in compensatory damages, or 
$500,000, whichever is greater. That would means the verdict in 
the $581 million case would have been no higher than 
$3.9 million. 
Plaintiffs' lawyers have said Alabama's 
consumer protection laws are so weak that such verdicts have been consumers' 
only real protection against being cheated. 
Greg Breedlove, president of 
the Alabama Trial Lawyers Association, said that if there is a problem with 
Alabama's tort laws, the courts can correct it. 
For example, he said, 
the $4 million won in the BMW case was struck down by the 
Supreme Court and eventually sliced to $50,000. 
"The 
reality is we don't need wholesale changes to our tort law," he said. Instead, 
he said, the changes "address the perception of that problem." 
LOAD-DATE: June 02, 1999