Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: class action w/10 reform

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 4 of 37. Next Document

Copyright 2000 Denver Publishing Company  
DENVER ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS

September 10, 2000, Sunday

SECTION: Business; Ed. Final; Pg. 2G

LENGTH: 724 words

HEADLINE: LETTERS

BODY:





Reforming class-action lawsuits


I was pleased to see the business community forming a group in an attempt to slow down the insanity so prevalent in consumer lawsuits. Also, they could not have picked a more able chair than Jake Jabs. However, I feel they are doomed to hit that stone wall. The national legislative bodies, at escalating levels, are largely made up of attorneys and they are not about to "cut off the hand that feeds them" in any objective effort to reform our consumer and class action litigation.

There are two simple steps that would go a long way towards "control with fairness":

1. Loser Pays Winner's Costs. Of course, this patently equitable concept sends the legal community running first to their psychiatrist and then to their Political Action Committees. 2. Then the most egregious folly, i.e., Punitive Damages, could be quite easily brought into line. Many years ago at a legal seminar on this subject I proposed a simple approach. It is pretty well accepted that in this the primary purpose of punitive damages is to punish the wrongdoer, not reward the plaintiff; they are supposedly solaced by the many categories of actual damages. Therefore, if punitive damages went to an approved list of secular charities, and the plaintiff got to select the recipient in his or her case, and attorneys' fee were limited to 5 percent on the punitive damages you would see a sharp decline in those noble efforts to punish those big bad corporations. Upon positing these thoughts I was roundly and soundly booed by the attending lawyers, which was proof positive I had offered a fair idea.

Donald S. Clarke

Aurora


Coal keeps down heating costs


The Aug. 27th article titled "Heat is on this winter: Natural gas costs jump," demonstrated how the increased use of natural gas-fired electric power to meet rising electricity demand is driving up the cost of natural gas for home heating this winter.

Yet, few are aware that 85 percent of Colorado's electricity is generated by coal - our most abundant, domestic energy resource. Electricity from coal has kept our electric power costs 11 percent below the national average and has demonstrated remarkable price stability in an age of skyrocketing gasoline and natural gas prices. In fact, over the past 20 years, the price of coal increased only 4 percent, compared to a 211 percent increase in the price of natural gas and a 51 percent increase in the price of crude oil.

Technological advances have and will continue to make electricity from coal increasingly clean. America's electric utilities that use coal have invested over $50 billion to make electricity from coal cleaner and more efficient.

For Colorado's families and businesses electricity from coal is not only essential, it is affordable and increasingly clean.

Terry Ross

Vice President Western Region,

Center for Energy and Economic Development

Franktown


Standard practice for United


On Friday, Aug. 25, I sat in my living room and watched a commercial with the CEO of United Airlines, Mr. James Goodwin, expressing his sincere apologies to the American people for the disruption in their travel plans this year.

I thought to myself that this was a very brave and forthright approach to the situation and thought United Airlines must really be trying to make amends. The very next day, I was on a flight to Aspen, CO from San Diego, CA with any reservations I might have had about your airline behind me.

Upon my arrival in Denver, I was told that flight attendants weren't available for the flight and therefore it was being canceled. I thought this was by far the most outrageous excuse for canceling a flight I have ever heard, but I now realize that this has become a standard practice for your airline. Flights are constantly being canceled with very little regard to travelers.

For my troubles, I would like to be compensated for the following purchases I made as a result of the "disruption in my travel plans".

Cab Fare to hotel $10

Toothpaste $.80

Toothbrush $2.60

Deodorant $4.99

Tampons $2.50

Total $20.89

I don't have a receipt for the cab fare, but as I have taken your CEO's word, then you should take mine.

Angela J. Waldin

San Diego





NOTES:
LETTERS
OPINION PAGE

LOAD-DATE: September 13, 2000




Previous Document Document 4 of 37. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: class action w/10 reform
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.