Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: class action w/10 reform

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 31 of 37. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Plain Dealer Publishing Co.  
The Plain Dealer

 View Related Topics 

April 13, 1999 Tuesday, FINAL / ALL

SECTION: EDITORIALS & FORUM; Pg. 8B

LENGTH: 427 words

HEADLINE: GIVE OR TAKE A FEW MILLION;
LEGAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION'S CAREFREE WAYS WITH FACTS AND FIGURES REMAIN A PROBLEM

BODY:
Federal programs that spend millions in often controversial ways should be extra careful about accounting for that funding. The Legal Services Corp. was not, so it's in trouble again.

A quasi-government agency, the LSC was criticized for years for exceeding its congressional mandate to provide funding to local agencies for free legal assistance in civil matters to the poor. In the last few years, Congress has prohibited use of federal funding for LSC class-action suits on redistricting, welfare reform and other disputes; arguably, they constitute taxpayer-financed political activism rather than the agency's intended concern: legal assistance on individual needs such as leases, wills and domestic matters. Congress has also been known to whack LSC's funds, though its 1999 budget of $300 million is hardly peanuts, up $17 million from 1998. The problem now: Though its funding is up, the LSC's caseload probably is down - if all caseload figures are accurately reported, which the 1997 statistics were not. Why, critics reasonably ask, give more funds to an agency that cannot or will not correctly account for funds already spent?

According to its inspector general, the caseload statistics the LSC obtains from its funding recipients nationwide play a large part in budget allocation and performance evaluation. But in close looks at only five of its 269 affiliated agencies nationwide (none of the five in Ohio), those statistics for 1997 - number of cases closed, eligible people served, etc. - were off by at least 90,000 cases. The corporation anticipates that with a proper count, the 1998 numbers will drop at least 200,000 from 1997's 1.93 million.

In listing some 15,000 telephone calls as closed cases, for example, the San Diego program overstated that category by 68 percent. It also failed to determine callers' eligibility for its services. The Lakeland, Fla., program reported some 45,000 new cases, though the actual number was about 5,500. Computer error, it claims.

How to calculate the numbers of clients and cases has been a source of some confusion. But even after clarification, some local organizations continued to report inflated numbers.

That's no way to make the case for additional funding. In fact, it's a good way to make the case of longtime critics that the Legal Services Corp. has an inflated estimation of its scope, authority and support that only deflating its funding can fix. It's up to the agency to make the opposite case - without expanding its writ beyond the law or its statistics beyond reality.

COLUMN: EDITORIALS

LOAD-DATE: April 14, 1999




Previous Document Document 31 of 37. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: class action w/10 reform
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.