Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: class action w/10 reform

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 28 of 37. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Plain Dealer Publishing Co.  
The Plain Dealer

 View Related Topics 

May 22, 1999 Saturday, FINAL / ALL

SECTION: EDITORIALS & FORUM; Pg. 8B

LENGTH: 461 words

HEADLINE: Y2K LAW, PDQ;
THE PUBLIC INTEREST MUST OUTWEIGH SPECIAL INTERESTS: LIMIT LIABILITY WITHOUT BANNING LAWSUITS

BODY:
"While the right to seek redress in court for real damages should remain fundamental, policymakers should encourage effective alternatives to litigation while discouraging frivolous lawsuits or civil jury awards that go far beyond what is necessary and appropriate to deter bad behavior."

That's the Democratic Leadership Council on how to deal with the computer glitch-in-the-making known as Y2K. That's why 28 Democrats, despite the White House's and their congressional leaders' opposition, joined most Republicans in the House the other day to pass legislation with that common-sense premise. But Democrats beholden to trial lawyers and special-interest consumer groups decided to hold the legislation up by unrelated "debate" in the Senate. Just how grievous the Y2K problem will be is a matter of conjecture. The President's Council on Year-2000 Conversion advises having on hand a three-day supply of water, nonperishable foods, batteries and prescription medications, much as you would for the "usual winter storm." But for all the $50 billion businesses have spent to glide past the glitch, there will be blips in record-keeping, shipping, etc., that spring water, potted meat and the Energizer Bunny won't solve.

Neither will frivolous lawsuits that could run up legal costs "more than three times the total annual estimated cost of all civil litigation in the United States," according to the DLC. The American Bar Association foresees costs that surpass asbestos, breast-implant, tobacco and Superfund litigation combined.

Add the penchant of some juries to inflate damages, and the costs soar to $1 trillion. Add, too, the cost to the economy of cutting back research, development and expansion to avoid Y2K-type suits.

The goal should be to get over the blips with as little disruption as possible, not to plant one more money tree for trial lawyers to shake bare. That's why the legislation includes making potential plaintiffs try mediation for 90 days before filing suit, which would give companies a chance to correct problems. It's why limits would be set on punitive damages ($250,000 or three times the compensatory damages), on the extent of a business' liability (only its share of the blame) and on class-action suits.

The Clinton White House is in a bind: Two constituencies that have donated millions of dollars to Democratic campaigns - trial lawyers and Silicon Valley entrepreneurs - are at odds on this issue. The entrepreneurs fear the lawsuits; the lawyers, the precedent for wider tort reform. Senate Republicans' attempts to meet White House hints toward compromise haven't helped.

Without even the basic limits provided in this bill, however, the economy will be in a bind, and losers will far outnumber winners.

LOAD-DATE: May 23, 1999




Previous Document Document 28 of 37. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: class action w/10 reform
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.