Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: tort, reform

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 56 of 57. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Times Publishing Company  
St. Petersburg Times

February 21, 1999, Sunday

SECTION: PERSPECTIVE; COLUMNS; Pg. 3D

LENGTH: 932 words

HEADLINE: 'Tort reform' a lousy deal for consumers

BYLINE: MARTIN DYCKMAN

BODY:
 Whoever pays the piper gets to call the tune. So when Florida's big business lobbies bought themselves a Legislature that would protect them from being sued by the injured and the dead, they gave their project a name that has stuck: "Tort Reform." That is how much of the media continues to mislabel it, contributing to the misimpression that the other side, the trial lawyers, are the bad guys.

Some of them may be, but at least they're our bad guys. The public aren't disinterested spectators in this clash of titans, though most legislators hope you will think so. It's about what happens to us after the ambulance or coroner comes. If the pols get away with it:

You're broadsided by a rental car driven by a drunken tourist who has no insurance. Your spouse is killed, you can't work for a year and your kid is permanently brain-damaged. Now, the rental company has deep pockets. After the Legislature is through, $ 800,000 will be the limit of its liability - in most cases, only $ 300,000 - no matter how many people are hurt or killed. Wayne Huizenga, who owns two rental car companies, has contributed at least $ 578,000 to Florida politicians and political parties over the past three years.

If he needs a liability cap, why not people who drive their own cars? Your liability remains unlimited. Companies that profit from renting something as dangerous as a motor vehicle may have a claim to some sort of limit, but it ought to be a lot higher and apply only if their customers are well-insured.

You're left for dead by an armed robber in the supermarket parking lot. The thugs hit often before the management hired security guards. But the guards were let go after the 1999 Legislature stipulated other, less expensive ways for commercial property owners to fulfill their "duty" to the public.

Experts, including the Consumer Product Safety Commission, have been warning for years about an escalator danger called "sidewall entrapment." There's a simple fix, but the manufacturers didn't want to spend the money, so your daughter, who really loved her ballet lessons, loses a big toe. The manufacturer is blameless because the device was made and installed more than 12 years ago.

The same would be true for airplanes or any other products that go bad because of design defects or inferior manufacture that take more than 12 years - or 18, in the Senate bill - to show up.

Even in cases where the time hadn't run out, manufacturers would be shielded from paying more than $ 250,000 in punitive damages except in rare cases.

There really is a little ballerina who lost most of her big toe. Her name is Marissa Davis, she was 6 when it happened, and her parents, Wayne and Kathy Davis of St. Petersburg, have been trying to help the trial lawyers fight the bill even though it wouldn't affect their lawsuit.

Gov. Lawton Chiles vetoed a similar bill last year, citing the 12-year "statute of repose" as one of his reasons. It was one of the best reasons he had. Few of the things that can hurt people - except, notably, cheap handguns - are made in this state.

"This provision will shield large, out-of-state manufacturers from liability at the expense of Florida consumers, and I cannot allow it to become law," Chiles wrote.

But Jeb Bush was elected to succeed him, and the business lobbies helped elect an even-friendlier Legislature. New bills are on fast tracks in both houses. In some ways, they are better than last year, in some ways they are worse, and in too many they are the same.

The Davises were cheered in one respect: "Statute of repose" wasn't in the Senate bill at first. They watched in dismay last week as a Senate committee wrote it in. Afterward, they had angry words with Majority Leader Jack Latvala, R-Palm Harbor, who had gone along with the amendment by Sens. John Laurent, R-Bartow, and Al Gutman, R-Miami.

(It had to be Gutman. No legislator shills more shamelessly for special interests. He got $ 5,500 in 1998 campaign contributions from Associated Industries of Florida, the chief drum-beater for "tort reform," and its corporate affiliates.)

Latvala told the Davises that escalators are considered part of the real estate and already subject to a 15-year statute of repose. This is what the business lobbies and some Senate lawyers say, too. The trial lawyers emphatically disagree.

Davis said Latvala was "visibly shaken" by their encounter. Latvala says Mrs. Davis was "fairly belligerent." 

"We have a Legislature that is very heavily business-oriented and a governor committed to signing the same bill that passed last year," Latvala said Friday. "We have moved substantially in the public interest when we changed it from 12 to 18 years. I think I should have been congratulated by people like Wayne Davis when I worked that deal out, because it would have passed at 12 years. . . . The House has it at 12 years, I'm trying to improve it because of the concerns the Davises' raise, and the way I am trying to improve it is to take control of it."

Bush did say he would have signed the bill Chiles vetoed. He also expressed concern over the 12-year repose and the punitive damage caps.

Though plenty of business big shots are pushing "tort reform," it turned out to be a non-issue in the recent St. Petersburg Times' 11th annual survey of Tampa Bay employers. When they said what they wanted the new governor to do, education came first. Of the 128 executives interviewed, only one mentioned the litigation debate.

So to whom - or what - is the Legislature listening? The people who called the tune.



LOAD-DATE: February 22, 1999




Previous Document Document 56 of 57. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: tort, reform
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.