Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: tort, reform

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 43 of 57. Next Document

Copyright 1999 The Tribune Co. Publishes The Tampa Tribune  
The Tampa Tribune

 View Related Topics 

April 30, 1999, Friday, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: FLORIDA/METRO, Pg. 6

LENGTH: 407 words

HEADLINE: Senate poised to vote today on tort "reform';


BYLINE: MARGARET TALEV, of The Tampa Tribune;

BODY:


TALLAHASSEE - The long-running battle over the future of personal injury lawsuits now hinges on  the Florida Senate, which will vote on tort "reform" today in the closing hours of the legislative  session.

Herds of lobbyists for corporations and for their opponents, trial lawyers, began their final  descent on senators Thursday after House and Senate negotiators settled on compromise legislation  both chambers will take up for a vote.

The House is expected to easily pass the compromise, crafted by Sen. Jack Latvala, R-Palm  Harbor, after days of behind-the-scenes meetings with lobbyists. But how the Senate will vote  remains up in the air. Supporters of the tort "reform" package say it will improve Florida's business climate, curb  frivolous lawsuits and even reduce insurance rates and product costs for consumers.

Opponents say the measure will prevent injured citizens from collecting enough money to pay for  their medical bills, and will give corporations so much protection that they will no longer be  motivated to create safe products or fix defects.

The legislation would require an injured person, before collecting unlimited punitive damages,  to prove a company intended to hurt the user.

It would help co-defendants who have a small share of responsibility for an injury but can now  be forced to pay other defendants' shares. Those less than 10 percent responsible would pay only  their share of damages, under the plan. If the person injured were in any way responsible,  defendants might have to pay only half as much as if the injured person had no role.

People who are drunk or on drugs when they are injured could have a smaller chance of collecting  damages.

People injured by defective products more than 12 years old could not sue the manufacturer in  most cases; manufacturers of airplanes, railroad equipment and vessels would be shielded after 20  years. And people who developed diseases years after coming into contact with a product would have  to prove the product was no more than 12 or 20 years old when they came into contact with it.

Rental car companies and individuals who lend their automobiles to people who hurt others in an  accident would be protected from having to cover more than $ 500,000 in damages, and in some cases  would have to cover no more than $ 100,000.  Margaret Talev covers state government and can be reached at (850) 222-8382.

NOTES: LEGISLATURE '99

LOAD-DATE: May 1, 1999




Previous Document Document 43 of 57. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: tort, reform
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.