Copyright 1999 The Washington Post
The Washington
Post
View Related Topics
March 17, 1999, Wednesday, Final Edition
SECTION: A SECTION; Pg. A04
LENGTH: 671 words
HEADLINE:
GOP Plan Boosts Defense, Education Dollars
BYLINE:
George Hager, Washington Post Staff Writer
BODY:
Senate Republicans began unveiling details of their fiscal 2000
budget yesterday, showcasing boosts in defense and education spending, a major
10-year tax cut and plans to lock away more surpluses for Social Security than
President Clinton has proposed.
The proposal, which provides specific
numbers for a budgetary framework announced by House and Senate Republican
leaders two weeks ago, would cut taxes by $ 15 billion next year and nearly $
800 billion over the coming decade. It would boost defense spending by $ 10
billion next year and provide an extra $ 3.3 billion for education.
"Overall, we have a very good budget," Senate Budget Committee Chairman
Pete V. Domenici (R-N.M.) said as the committee began deliberations he predicted
would produce a finished product by the end of the week. The House Budget
Committee is scheduled to approve a nearly identical budget today. Democrats
quickly declared the GOP proposal lacking, criticizing it for what they said was
a plan to shortchange Medicare in order to make room for tax cuts. "Is the first
thing that we do to provide tax cuts for those in a higher income bracket, or do
we save Medicare?" said Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg (N.J.), senior Democrat on the
Budget Committee.
In an unexpected twist, the GOP budget would set aside
$ 132 billion over the next 10 years that could be used for Medicare reform.
That is less than the roughly $ 350 billion the White House demanded be put
away, but it appears to give Republicans some defense against persistent
Democratic criticism that they would underfund the big health care program for
the elderly, which is projected to go bankrupt after 2008.
As for Social
Security, Domenici insisted his budget sets aside all $ 1.8 trillion of the
Social Security surplus over the next 10 years, while Clinton's proposal would
protect only $ 1.3 trillion.
In the more immediate universe of
Congress's annual spending bills, the proposed budget would increase defense
spending by nearly $ 10 billion above the current level, which includes onetime
emergency funding approved last fall. The increase from the nonemergency level
would be about $ 18 billion.
The budget plan would increase spending for
elementary and secondary education by $ 3.3 billion next year and $ 28 billion
over the next five years, fulfilling Domenici's pledge to allow Republicans to
vie with Democrats as protectors of education.
At the same time, though,
the budget would require GOP appropriators to live within strict spending caps
set in the 1997 balanced-budget agreement, despite widespread bipartisan fear
that Congress will not be able to pass spending bills this year without more
money.
While the budget plan does not mandate where appropriators should
cut back in order to keep spending below the caps, it offers some ideas. It
suggests saving $ 2.8 billion next year by privatizing the Government National
Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), which guarantees securities based on
government-insured mortgages.
It suggests repeal of the
Davis-Bacon Act, which effectively requires contractors on
government construction projects to pay union scale. It also suggests freezing
or terminating lower-priority programs.
The budget would cut taxes by at
least $ 15 billion next year, and by $ 778 billion in the 10 years from 2000
through 2009. Domenici said the larger tax cuts would begin to kick in as the
non-Social Security budget surplus grows in later years.
Domenici
brushed aside charges that the GOP is cutting taxes for the rich, insisting that
the budget mandates no specific tax cut. However, he said the budget could
accommodate a reduction in the so-called marriage penalty, extension of the
research and development tax credit and other targeted tax breaks.
And
in a disappointment for cash-strapped appropriators, he said that if the
Congressional Budget Office projects a larger surplus when it redoes its fiscal
2000 projections this July, the extra money would go for tax cuts, not spending
bills.
LOAD-DATE: March 17, 1999