Copyright 2000 The Washington Post
The Washington Post
October 30, 2000, Monday, Final Edition
SECTION: OP-ED; Pg. A26
LENGTH: 191 words
HEADLINE:
The Going Rate
BODY: In recent articles on
school construction I have noticed a recurring error concerning the federal
prevailing wage law, also known as the
Davis-Bacon Act.
Contrary to The Post's reporting [news story, Oct. 1], the
Davis-Bacon Act does not require the payment of union scale
wages on all federal construction projects. The law requires the payment of the
locally prevailing or average wage found through a wage and benefit survey of a
geographic area. If the average wage for a job classification is the minimum
wage that is often found in the southern and rural areas, then the
Davis-Bacon wage is the minimum wage. This is true even if the
union wage is many times more. In an area where union-level wages dominate for
certain crafts and job classifications, the wage should reflect the majority of
workers surveyed and be at a rate similar or equal to the union level.
In 1999 nearly 75 percent of published
Davis-Bacon wage
rates were not union rate but a nonunion lower wage scale.
Published
rates for the various areas around the nation can be found at the U.S.
Debartment of Labor's Web site.
STAN KOLBE
Washington
LOAD-DATE: October 30, 2000