Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: computer AND depreciation

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 10 of 49. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The Tribune Co. Publishes The Tampa Tribune  
The Tampa Tribune

August 20, 2000, Sunday, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: COMMENTARY, Pg. 3

LENGTH: 754 words

HEADLINE: New economy depends on fiscal discipline;


BYLINE: ROB ATKINSON;

BODY:


I want to commend The Tampa Tribune for the Aug. 6 editorial discussing the Progressive Policy  Institute's new economy task force report, "Making the New Economy Grow: An Action Agenda"  (www.ppionline.org). The task force was chaired by Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle and Gateway  Computer Chairman Ted Waitt, and made up of leading high-tech entrepreneurs and elected officials,  including Rep. Jim Davis of Tampa.

As the director of that task force, I don't agree with all the observations the editorial made.  But I do appreciate the thoughtful comments and the fostering of a discussion about the appropriate  role of government in keeping the new economy boom going. While the editorial supported many of the  ideas proposed by the task force, such as updating tax depreciation schedules on technology  equipment, not overregulating e-commerce and establishing e-commerce assistance centers, it  questioned others. For example, the editorial questioned the wisdom of helping businesses train workers in basic  skills and argued that the focus should be on fixing our K-12 schools. We agree that much more  should be done to reform our public school system, but that's not to say we shouldn't also work to  help the millions of workers already in the work force gain the education and skills they need to  prosper in the new economy. Evidence is clear that employer-based training is the most effective  way to provide workers with the basic skills they may lack, and public policies (e.g., training tax  credits, industry led skills alliances) can encourage employers to provide this training.

The editorial also took exception to the task force's recommendation to create a chief  information officer for the federal government to oversee the creation of e-government efforts,  such as filing taxes, renewing passports and applying for Social Security benefits online. It noted  that local governments are getting online without a "high-tech czar." At least at the state level,  however, more than 35 states, including Florida, have chief information officers precisely because  they have recognized that without a person to take the lead, e-government is slow to emerge and  often replicates existing bureaucracies. In the task force's view, creating a CIO for the federal  government would accelerate the creation of a digital, customer-centered federal government.

Perhaps the most serious criticism the editorial made was that the task force's legislative  agenda was an attempt to engage in a "bidding war on high-tech welfare" and that Republicans would be  better off avoiding this.

If advocating steps like reversing the Republican-led decline in federal support for scientific  research, supporting training efforts to ensure American workers have the skills to fill new  economy jobs, and helping community organizations take advantage of the Internet is a high-tech  bidding war, then we plead guilty as charged. As the task force stated: "Achieving the full promise  of the new economy and increasing the rate of growth in per-capita incomes requires not just  private sector innovation and entrepreneurial drive, but also concerted and strategic public  policies to overcome key challenges." The task force understands the key role that targeted public  investments, particularly in research, education and skills, play in boosting growth in this  knowledge-based economy. We shouldn't forget that the technology underlying the Internet and the  human genome project all came from early investments by the federal government in scientific  research.

It's important to know, though, that the Progressive Policy Institute is committed first and  foremost to fiscal discipline and paying off the national debt. Altogether the task force proposals  account for less than 5 percent of the proposed budget surplus by 2010. We not only can afford  these limited and targeted investments, but if we are to ensure that the boom continues and extends  to all Americans, we need to make them.

Instead of resurrecting the failed supply-side policies that conservatives advocate, a true new  economy policy agenda is grounded on fiscal discipline, fostering the digital economy and making  investments in knowledge, research and skills. And that's what the Task Force and its members,  including Congressman Jim Davis, propose.  Rob Atkinson is the director of Technology and New Economy at the Progressive Policy Institute in Washington, D.C.

NOTES: GUEST COLUMN LETTERS

LOAD-DATE: August 24, 2000




Previous Document Document 10 of 49. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: computer AND depreciation
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.