POLITICS - Peeling Onions In the Big Apple
By Charlie Cook, National Journal
© National Journal
Group Inc.
Saturday, June 05, 1999
Nearly all of the talk about the upcoming New York Senate
race has focused on the possibility of a matchup between first
lady Hillary Rodham Clinton and New York City Mayor Rudolph W.
Giuliani. But don't overlook two other names: Rick A. Lazio and
Michael R. Long. Lazio, 41, is a fourth-term GOP congressman from
Long Isl and who is looking at running for the Senate as a
Republican, and seeking the backing of the Conservative Party.
And Long is the chairman of New York's Conservative Party.
Why do Lazio and Long matter? Because even if
conventional wisdom is correct, and Clinton and Giuliani face off
in the general election, the presence of other candidates on the
ballot could complicate matters. It is possible that Giuliani
will get the Liberal Party endorsement, while Lazio nabs the
support of the Conservative Party. The Right to Life Party could
also nominate a candidate. Such a scenario would give Clinton an
advantage. Then again, there's the chance that mischievous
Republicans or Conservatives might entice a liberal minority
Democrat such as the Rev. Al Sharpton to run as the candidate of
the Independence Party. That would siphon votes away from
Clinton. In short, the race promises to be like an onion: Peeling
back one layer always reveals a new and completely different
layer.
First, a look at the state of play in New York. When the
first lady and the President returned from their Amelia Island,
Fla., vacation last weekend, the word around town was that ''all
systems are go'' for her making a Senate race. As a first step,
Mrs. Clinton is expected to announce the creation of an
exploratory committee soon. The committee could raise money and
pay for her travel costs to and around New York, thereby averting
embarrassing stories about the first lady campaigning on the
taxpayers' dime.
Although Giuliani has already created an exploratory
committee, he has not yet agreed to run. Some New York political
insiders believe that there is a chance he won't. They argue that
he could bow out by saying that he does not want to create an
opening for liberal Mark Green, the city's public advocate, to
succeed him as mayor and undo all that his administration has
accomplished. Still, the betting here is that Giuliani is in the
race to stay.
The next question is whether Giuliani runs only as a
Republican or also seeks the Liberal Party line on the ballot.
Giuliani, who ran on both lines during his two successful mayoral
bids in 1993 and 1997, is very close to Raymond B. Harding, the
leader of the state Liberal Party, and has given city patronage
jobs to a number of people with close ties to the Liberal Party.
So the nomination is probably his for the asking. But there's a
hitch: The Conservatives have an iron-clad policy of not
endorsing anyone on the Liberal line. If Giuliani has the Liberal
line, he need not apply for the Conservative one.
Meanwhile, Lazio has moved aggressively around the state,
meeting with county and local officials from both the Republican
and Conservative Parties. Lazio has not announced his candidacy,
but it certainly looks as if he's running. He sported a $ 1.8
million campaign war chest as of the first of the year, and he's
apparently raised about $ 500,000 since then. Although Lazio is
hardly a hard-line conservative, he's closer to being one than
Giuliani is. For instance, Lazio generally supports abortion
rights, but is adamantly opposed to ''partial-birth'' abortions,
and can be expected to contrast himself sharply with Giuliani on
issues.
If he runs, Lazio could also be expected to make much of
the fact that Giuliani campaigned for Democratic Gov. Mario M.
Cuomo's re-election in 1994. This did not endear him to many
Republicans, including Gov. George E. Pataki, who beat Cuomo that
year. But Lazio isn't in the race yet. Some speculate that he's
waiting for assurances that Pataki will back him; others say that
there's no way Pataki would go beyond passive encouragement
before Lazio announces his candidacy and demonstrates that he
deserves to be taken seriously. Everyone agrees that Pataki
doesn't want to embarrass himself by backing a statewide
candidate who gets steamrollered in the Republican primary by his
archenemy.
One other factor for Lazio to keep in mind: timing. If
Lazio does run, he needs to get into the race before Giuliani
does. Otherwise, Lazio will be seen as a spoiler who will
accomplish little except splitting votes with Giuliani and
ensuring the election of the first lady. If Lazio gets in first,
he will arguably have the moral high ground.
While no polls have pitted Giuliani against Lazio,
there's no doubt that Giuliani starts out well ahead. The
question is whether his lead will hold up in the face of charges
from Lazio that ideological differences between the mayor and the
first lady are more of style than of substance. By any standard,
Giuliani is among the most liberal of Republican major
officeholders in the nation. Furthermore, only about 13 percent
of the statewide Republican vote comes from New York City, while
much of the other 87 percent views the city as Sodom-and-
Gomorrah-on-Hudson. There are plenty of Republicans who hated
Giuliani for endorsing Cuomo, hated him for opposing the
impeachment of President Clinton, and were appalled by his
opposition to repealing the much-hated commuter tax in New York.
Some insiders believe that Lazio can beat Giuliani in the primary
and that a unified Republican and Conservative Party effort is
the only way to beat Clinton.
Enter Mike Long, who got into politics backing Barry
Goldwater in 1964 and has been chairman of the state Conservative
Party since 1988. Long is the undisputed leader of the party,
jealously defending its role in the election process. He proudly
points out that no Republican since former Sen. Jacob K. Javits
in 1974 has won statewide in New York without the Conservative
Party endorsement. (Javits ran on the Republican and Liberal
Party lines.) And he notes that James L. Buckley was elected to
the Senate on the Conservative line in 1970, beating Richard
Ottinger, the Democrat, and Charles E. Goodell, who had both the
Republican and Liberal lines. Long wants a winner, but not at the
expense of the party's principles, one of which is opposition to
partial-birth abortion. Those close to the Conservative Party say
that Giuliani could win the Conservative nomination only if he
promised to come closer to party dogma on issues such as partial-
birth abortion and taxes.
The procedure in New York is for the Conservative Party
(as well as Liberal and Right to Life Parties) to hold a
convention, in June 2000, at which delegates representing each of
New York's 31 congressional districts will gather to select their
party's candidate. Long could call a rump convention sooner, in,
say, February, to signal the party's choice. Presumably, Long and
other party leaders would not do so unless they were confident
their candidate would win at the June convention.
Whether they endorse Lazio may depend on his ability to
show he's building momentum, which is not easy. Just ask Democrat
Charles E. Schumer. During his 1998 bid for the Democratic
nomination for Senate, Schumer languished in last place for a
long time, despite significant spending on his part, before
overtaking Mark Green and former Rep. Geraldine A. Ferraro.
Another factor working against Lazio: Given his moderate voting
record, the Conservative Party might well favor a more
conservative alternative if one emerges.
So what does Long say about Lazio? He notes that Lazio
''has had our endorsement in the past and is clearly moving
around the state, meeting with Conservative leaders, and visibly
is the only individual who, while not a candidate, is trying to
win the support of the Conservative Party.'' Translation: Lazio
is doing what he needs to do, but must commit to the race soon
and show he can be competitive.
With most polls showing Giuliani and Clinton running even
in two-way matchups, Clinton's chances may hinge more on what
Lazio and Long do than on how she performs in the campaign.