Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: partial birth abortion

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 541 of 609. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Globe Newspaper Company  
The Boston Globe

May 19, 1999, Wednesday ,City Edition

SECTION: METRO/REGION; Pg. B3PHOTO

LENGTH: 257 words

HEADLINE: Opposing sides weigh in on late procedure;
[ A PUBLISHED CORRECTION HAS BEEN ADDED TO THIS STORY.

BYLINE: Associated Press

BODY:

   Roman Catholic Cardinal Bernard Law urged lawmakers yesterday to pass a bill banning so-called "partial-birth" abortions, but abortion rights and women's activists said the procedures are rare and done only when medically necessary.

"Moral decency demands no less than the passage of this bill," Law told the Legislature's Judiciary Committee. But opponents said the procedures are performed only when a woman's life or health is endangered, or when problems with the fetus are discovered.

"Third-trimester abortions are not performed on healthy women carrying healthy fetuses," Pam Nourse, a spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, said in a statement.

The decision to have the procedure "is a sad and tragic family decision; empathy, not political rhetoric, is needed," she said.

The late-term abortion procedure has been controversial in recent years. Congress has twice passed a similar ban and President Clinton has vetoed it twice.

Around the country, the bans have been passed in numerous state Legislatures, with legal challenges frequently following soon after.

The Massachusetts bill defines a partial-birth abortion as partially delivering a fetus before "killing the fetus and completing the delivery."

The proposed law would ban the procedure if a pregnancy has proceeded past 24 weeks "except if it is necessary to save the life of the mother."

The bill would impose a maximum fine of $2,000 and up to five years in prison on doctors who perform partial-birth abortions.

GRAPHIC: ,CHURCH AND STATE - Bishop Shawn O'Malley (from left), of Worcester, Cardinal Bernard Law, and Bishop William Murphy at the State House yesterday supporting a ban on partial-birth abortion. The debate on Beacon Hill could be contentious. (PHOTO, PG. B1) / GLOBE STAFF PHOTO / JANET KNOTT [ CORRECTION - DATE: Thursday, May 20, 1999: CORRECTION: Because of incorrect information supplied to the Globe, a photo caption in yesterday's Metro/Region section referring to a story on partial-birth abortions misidentified two bishops. Featured in the photo were Bishop Sean O'Malley of the diocese of Fall River (left), Cardinal Bernard Law, and Bishop Daniel Reilly of the diocese of Worcester.]

LOAD-DATE: May 28, 1999




Previous Document Document 541 of 609. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: partial birth abortion
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.