Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: partial birth abortion

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 158 of 609. Next Document

Copyright 2000 Chicago Sun-Times, Inc.  
Chicago Sun-Times

June 29, 2000, THURSDAY, Late Sports Final Edition

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 22

LENGTH: 539 words

HEADLINE: Abortion law overturned; 
Court scraps Nebraska 'partial-birth' procedure ban

DATELINE: WASHINGTON

BODY:
The Supreme Court on Wednesday severely limited the power of states to ban a type of late-term abortion that had been the favorite target of abortion opponents in recent years.

The court ruled 5-4 against a Nebraska law prohibiting one of two procedures that opponents call "partial-birth abortion." The court majority called the law an "undue burden" on women's rights. Thirty other states have similar laws, but the justices disagreed on how their ruling will affect them.

Doctors call the method outlawed in Nebraska dilation and extraction, or D&X, because it involves partially extracting a fetus, legs first, through the birth canal, cutting the skull and draining its contents.

A more common procedure is dilation and evacuation, or D&E, in which an arm or leg of a live fetus might be pulled into the birth canal during the operation.

The court said the Nebraska law, while purportedly aimed only at the D&X method, could criminalize the D&E method as well.

"Using this law, some present prosecutors and future attorneys general may choose to pursue physicians who use D&E procedures, the most commonly used method of performing previability second-trimester abortions," Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the court. "The result is an undue burden upon a woman's right to make an abortion decision."

The law's other big flaw, Breyer wrote, was that it lacked an exemption that would allow the D&X procedure if a doctor concluded that it was the best way to preserve a woman's health.

Joining Breyer were Justices John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, David H. Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

O'Connor suggested in a concurring opinion that states can ban some partial-birth abortions.

The dissenters -- Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas -- seemed to think the 30 other states might not be able to come up with a law that would satisfy the court majority.

Ginsburg and Breyer joined the court after a 1992 ruling upholding abortion rights. Wednesday's ruling was their first on abortion.

The procedure at issue in the Nebraska case is used for some abortions close to the point of viability, when a fetus is able to live outside the uterus. Past abortion rulings make clear that states can take many steps to protect fetal life once viability occurs, generally around the sixth month of pregnancy.

Nebraska's law, along with those in Arkansas and Iowa, was invalidated by a federal appeals court last year. But another federal appeals court upheld partial-birth abortion bans in Wisconsin and Illinois.

An appeal of that federal appeals court ruling still is pending before the justices and probably will be set aside and sent back for more study when the court's clerk issues new orders from the justices today.

Also Wednesday, the court gave states greater leeway to restrict demonstrations by abortion opponents outside health clinics. It upheld a Colorado law that bars people from counseling, distributing leaflets or displaying signs within 8 feet of others without their consent whenever they are within 100 feet of a health clinic entrance.

On the Web: (Supreme Court decision) supct.law.cornell.edu/ supct/html/99-830.ZS.html

GRAPHIC: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES WIRES

LOAD-DATE: June 29, 2000




Previous Document Document 158 of 609. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: partial birth abortion
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.