Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: partial birth abortion

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 437 of 609. Next Document

Copyright 1999 P.G. Publishing Co.  
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

November 16, 1999, Tuesday, SOONER EDITION

SECTION: EDITORIAL, Pg. A-10, LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

LENGTH: 307 words

HEADLINE: VIABLE INFANTS ABORTED

BYLINE: EDWARD G. KELLY, M.D.; UPPER ST. CLAIR

BODY:


I wish to set the record straight regarding the false statements in Ellen Goodman's Nov. 3 column, "Stealth Tactics." The column offered her views concerning recent court rulings on the procedure known, says Goodman, "colloquially and incorrectly as ' partial-birth abortion.' "

She additionally refers thereafter to this procedure as the "rare surgical technique known as dilation and extraction."

My comments deal with her comment that this procedure is almost entirely reserved for pregnancies that have gone tragically awry, often threatening the pregnant woman.

In the Post-Gazette on March 17, 1997, columnist Charles Krauthammer discussed how Ron Fitzsimmons, an abortion-rights advocate, admitted that he had "lied through his teeth" in making up facts about the number of and rationale for partial-birth abortions.

The column also states that Dr. Martin Haskell, at that time the country's leading partial-birth abortion practitioner, was asked by American Medical News why he just doesn't dilate the woman's uterus a little bit more and allow a live baby to come out. His answer was "the point is here you're attempting to do an abortion . . . not to see how do I manipulate the situation so that I get a live birth instead."

In the same column, Krauthammer said a doctor at a New Jersey clinic, which performed by its own doctors' estimate at least 1,500 of these procedures, told The (Bergen) Record: "Most are for elective, not medical, reasons: people who didn't realize or didn't care how far along they were."

Without going into details previously widely published, it is well-known that the procedure involves removal of an infant who would be a premature birth but certainly viable and, it appears, most often normal - in contrast to Ms. Goodman's assertion.

EDWARD G. KELLY, M.D.

Upper St. Clair

LOAD-DATE: November 16, 1999




Previous Document Document 437 of 609. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: partial birth abortion
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.