About CRLP
On the Hill
In the Courts
Worldwide
Publications
Press
Newsletter: RFN











in the courts

in this section



Abortion BansAbortion Bans

>Partial Birth Abortion Bans: Introduction

Stenberg v. Carhart: a Case Summary

Champagne and Shivers

Roe v. Wade At Stake

Physicians Against PBA Bill

Legislation By State

Statements by Key Players in the Case

Excerpts from the Supreme Court Arguments

Deception vs. Reality

Safe This Time: CRLP Newspaper Ad

CRLP Washington Post Ad

Abortion FundingAbortion Funding

Censorship and Free-Speech RestrictionCensorship and Free-Speech Restriction

Experimentation BansExperimentation Bans

Mandatory Delay and Biased Information CounselingMandatory Delay and Biased Information Counseling

Medical Abortion RestrictionsMedical Abortion Restrictions

Pregnant Women's RightsPregnant Women's Rights

Restrictions on Young WomenRestrictions on Young Women

Targeted Regulation of Abortion ProvidersTargeted Regulation of Abortion Providers

Violence/Harassment of ProvidersViolence/Harassment of Providers

Other LitigationOther Litigation



search


contribute
back to home

  "Partial-Birth Abortion" Bans -- Unconstitutional, Deceptive, Extreme



Stenberg v. Carhart
Stenberg v. Carhart:
The Supreme Court Rules



Introduction

SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN NEBRASKA ABORTION BAN

On June 28, 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a Nebraska ban on so-called "partial-birth abortion," finding it an unconstitutional violation of Roe v. Wade, the landmark decision that guaranteed women's right to choose abortion 27 years ago. The Court's decision in Stenberg v. Carhart exposed these bans for what they are: extreme and deceptive attempts to outlaw abortion --even early in pregnancy -- that jeopardize women's health. The Court's decision will have the domino effect of rendering similar bans passed in over 30 states and Congress unconstitutional or unenforceable.

DECEPTIVE

"Partial-birth abortion" bans do not ban late abortions, nor do they merely target one procedure. The bans potentially restrict the safest and most commonly used abortion methods throughout pregnancy.

EXTREME

These bans are extreme measures that make no exceptions for serious harm to a woman's health.

  • The bans criminalize most abortion procedures with severe penalties -- including imprisonment and fines -- against doctors.
  • The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, representing over 90 percent of all ob-gyn specialists, rejects this law as "inappropriate, ill advised and dangerous."

UNCONSTITUTIONAL

In a 5-4 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a Nebraska ban on so-called "partial-birth abortion," finding it an unconstitutional violation of Roe v. Wade. Writing for the majority, Justice Breyer found that the Nebraska ban violates the Supreme Court precedents Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey by failing to include an exception to preserve the health of the woman and by imposing an undue burden on a woman's ability to choose an abortion

In addition, the Court determined that the effect of the bans went well beyond prohibitions against so-called "late term" abortion, finding the ban to be so broad and vague that constitutionally protected abortion procedures performed before viability could be prohibited. The majority decision was joined by five Justices. Four separate dissenting opinions were filed by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas, demonstrating that Roe and the right to choose is imperiled.

The Court's decision will have the domino effect of rendering similar bans passed in over 30 states and Congress unconstitutional or unenforceable.

Further Information








































About CRLP
On the Hill
In the Courts
Worldwide
Publications
Press
Newsletter: RFN