site index

home page

local clinics

about us

you can help


Legislative Action Center
So-called "Partial Birth Abortion"

Federal Court of Appeals declares unconstitutional three states’ abortion laws

Women and their families and physicians in Arkansas, Iowa and Nebraska are today protected from bad laws and bad public policy

Planned Parenthood applauds the 8th circuit court of appeals


Statement by Gloria Feldt, President
Planned Parenthood Federation of America


September 24, 1999

Washington, DC — Women, their families and physicians in Arkansas, Iowa and Nebraska won an important legal victory today with a federal circuit ruling that declared so-called "partial birth abortion" laws unconstitutional.

Judges of the federal 8th circuit court of appeals in St. Louis delivered the three-state decision that knocked down anti-choice legislation undermined federal law and the legal protections of abortion rights.

"In today’s federal appeals court ruling, three different state laws were appropriately undone," said Planned Parenthood Federation of America attorney Eve Gartner, who played a leading role in the case of Planned Parenthood of Greater Iowa v. Miller.

Although 30 states have enacted similar laws since 1995, they have been challenged in 21 states and enjoined in whole or part in 20 states, said Gartner.

Today's ruling demonstrates, once again, that the rhetoric used by anti-choice legislators to push state laws limiting the so-called "partial birth" abortion procedure simply does not stand up in the courts.

The good news for women and their families in the states of Arkansas, Iowa, and is that the dangerous legislation and the underlying attempt to ban abortions in these three states has failed.

The losers are those who do not believe in a woman’s constitutionally guaranteed reproductive rights. The winners are the women and their families who face the decision to terminate a pregnancy, as well as the physicians and the clergy who work with them.

The abortion bans defeated today in three states would have been a dangerous intrusion of government into the doctor-patient relationship.

What does this latest victory portend for the newest battle being staged in Missouri?

This week a district court judge correctly ruled to temporarily stop the so-called "Infant Protection Act," an atavistic law vetoed by Governor Mel Carnahnan but overridden by the Missouri legislators last week.

One can only hope the people of Missouri and the anti-choice legislators who led the successful override last week will reconsider this attempt to criminalize a woman and her physician and to ban virtually all abortions in the state of Missouri.

Planned Parenthood understands that women and their families must be able to make decisions about their health care, including abortion. We know that doctors must be able to use their best judgment to determine the most appropriate medical course for each patient.

That none of the 20 abortion procedure bans enjoined by the courts make any exception to preserve a woman’s health stands as a stark reminder that anti-choice sponsors would sacrifice women’s well-being to accomplish their political agenda.

That’s why, in state after state, Planned Parenthood and other women’s health care providers have gone to court to challenge state laws similar to the laws that failed today.

The chambers of justice, unlike the halls of Congress and the halls of statehouses, have allowed reality to rise above the rhetoric that has dominated the political debate.

Judges take the time to listen carefully to medical experts and legal authorities. And, with but one exception, they are finding that these bans are invalid.





PPFA Web Site © 1999, Planned Parenthood® Federation of America, Inc.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to
Terms of Use