About CRLP
On the Hill
In the Courts
Worldwide
Publications
Press
Newsletter: RFN











on the hill

in this section



Access to Contraceptives for AdolescentsAccess to Contraceptives for Adolescents

Ban On Abortion For Women In the MilitaryBan On Abortion For Women In the Military

Child Custody Protection ActChild Custody Protection Act

>Strict Laws

>Broader Laws

>Enjoined or Not Enforced Laws

>No Law Enacted

>Letter to Members of the House of Representatives

Emergency Contraception (EC)Emergency Contraception (EC)

Equity in Contraceptive CoverageEquity in Contraceptive Coverage

Global Gag RuleGlobal Gag Rule

Mifepristone/Medical AbortionMifepristone/Medical Abortion

"Partial-Birth Abortion"

Privacy RegulationsPrivacy Regulations

State Children's Health Insurance ProgramState Children's Health Insurance Program

Treaty for the Rights of Women (CEDAW)Treaty for the Rights of Women (CEDAW)

U.S. Foreign Policy at the United NationsU.S. Foreign Policy at the United Nations

U.S. Support for Reproductive Rights AbroadU.S. Support for Reproductive Rights Abroad

News from the HillNews from the Hill

CRLP Correspondence to the HillCRLP Correspondence to the Hill

In the StatesIn the States



search


donate
back to home

  CCPA In Your State:
Strict Parental Involvement Laws


Twenty-three states enforce "strict" parental involvement laws: ones that match the CCPA definition.



  • Alabama
  • Arkansas
  • Georgia
  • Idaho
  • Indiana
  • Kansas
  • Kentucky
  • Louisiana
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Mississippi
  • Missouri
  • Nebraska
  • North Dakota
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • South Dakota
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Utah
  • Virginia
  • Wyoming


  • Alabama

    The Law in Alabama Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Alabama, she must obtain written consent from one parent or a legal guardian. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Alabama’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent from one parent and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Alabama minors to comply with Alabama law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Alabama Resident Minors
    Alabama minors seeking abortions in Alabama will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Alabama forced parental involvement law.

    Alabama minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Alabama, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with Alabama law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Alabama wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Mississippi. If the minor travels to Mississippi alone, she must comply with Mississippi’s forced parental involvement law but not Alabama’s law. However, if she travels to Mississippi with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Alabama and Mississippi. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Alabama law and obtain written consent from both parents in order to comply with Mississippi law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Alabama Providers
    Under CCPA, Alabama health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, an Alabama provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If an Alabama provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Alabama health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    ALA. CODE § 26-21-3, et seq. (2000)
    MISS. CODE ANN. § 41-41-51, et seq. (2001)

    Arkansas

    The Law in Arkansas Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Arkansas, she must wait at least forty-eight hours after written notice of the pending abortion has been delivered to both parents, a guardian or a custodian. A minor may obtain an abortion without both parents being notified if the minor declares that she is a victim of child abuse or neglect or she obtains a court order exempting her from such a requirement.

    Arkansas’ law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of both parents and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Arkansas minors to comply with Arkansas law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Arkansas Resident Minors
    Arkansas minors seeking abortions in Arkansas will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Arkansas forced parental involvement law.

    Arkansas minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Arkansas, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Arkansas law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Arkansas wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Missouri. If the minor travels to Missouri alone, she must comply with Missouri’s forced parental involvement law but not Arkansas’ law. However, if she travels to Missouri with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both Arkansas and Missouri. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both states. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must notify both parents in order to comply with Arkansas law and obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Missouri law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Arkansas Providers
    Under CCPA, Arkansas health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, an Arkansas provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non- parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If an Arkansas provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Arkansas health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    ARK. CODE ANN. § 20-16-801, et seq. (Michie 1999)
    MO. REV. STAT. § 188.028 (2000)

    Georgia

    The Law in Georgia Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Georgia, she must have proof of notification to one parent, guardian, or person standing in loco parentis. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental notification if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Georgia’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires notification to one parent and does not allow notification to any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Georgia minors to comply with Georgia law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Georgia Resident Minors
    Georgia minors seeking abortions in Georgia will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Georgia forced parental involvement law.

    Georgia minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Georgia, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Georgia law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Georgia wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Tennessee. If the minor travels to Tennessee alone, she must comply with Tennessee’s forced parental involvement law but not Georgia’s law. However, if she travels to Tennessee with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both Georgia and Tennessee. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Georgia and Tennessee. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must have proof of notification to one parent in order to comply with Georgia law and obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Tennessee law. If the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the non-parent and the abortion provider risk criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    The Effect of CCPA on Georgia Providers
    Under CCPA, Georgia health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Georgia provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Georgia provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny the services and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Georgia health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion

    GA. CODE ANN. § 15-11-110, et seq. (2000)
    TENN. CODE ANN. § 37-10-303 (2000)

    Idaho

    The Law in Idaho Pertaining to Minors’Access to Abortion If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Idaho, she must obtain written consent from a parent. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Idaho’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of one parent and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Idaho minors to comply with Idaho law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Idaho Resident Minors Idaho minors seeking abortions in Idaho will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Idaho forced parental involvement law.

    Idaho minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider will have to comply – as they currently do – with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Idaho, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with a variety of state laws or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory.

    For example, if a minor from Idaho wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Wyoming. If the minor travels to Wyoming alone, she must comply with Wyoming’s forced parental involvement law but not Idaho’s law. However, if she travels to Wyoming with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Idaho and Wyoming. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Idaho law and she must both notify one parent at least forty-eight hours prior to the abortion and obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Wyoming law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Idaho Providers
    Under CCPA, Idaho health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, an Idaho provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If an Idaho provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Idaho health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    IDAHO CODE § 18-609A (MICHIE 2000). A court has issued a permanent injunction on certain provisions of the statute; however, the one parent forced parental consent requirement is currently being enforced. Planned Parenthood of Idaho v. Lance, No. CIV 00-0353-S-MHW (D. Idaho).
    WYO. STAT. ANN. §§ 35-6-101, et seq. (Michie 2000)

    Indiana

    The Law in Indiana Pertaining to Minors’Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Indiana, she must obtain written consent from one parent or a legal guardian. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Indiana’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent from one parent and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Indiana minors to comply with Indiana law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Indiana Resident Minors
    Indiana minors seeking abortions in Indiana will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Indiana forced parental involvement law. Indiana minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Indiana, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Indiana law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, a minor from Indiana may have family in Arkansas and want to be close to them when she obtains an abortion. If the minor travels to Arkansas alone, she must comply with Arkansas’ forced parental involvement law but not Indiana’s law. However, if she travels to Arkansas with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both Indiana and Arkansas. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Indiana and Arkansas. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Indiana law and she must notify both parents forty-eight hours prior to the abortion in order to comply with Arkansas law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Indiana Providers
    Under CCPA, Indiana health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, an Indiana provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If an Indiana provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Indiana health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    IND. CODE §§ 16-34-2-4, 16-18-2-267 (2001)
    ARK. CODE ANN. § 20-16-801-808 (Michie 1999)

    Kansas

    The Law in Kansas Pertaining to Minors’Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Kansas, she must provide actual notice to one parent or legal guardian. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated, if she declares that the father of the fetus is one of the persons to whom notice is due, or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Kansas’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires notification to one parent and does not allow notification to any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Kansas minors to comply with Kansas law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Kansas Resident Minors
    Kansas minors seeking abortions in Kansas will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Kansas forced parental involvement law.

    Kansas minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Kansas, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Kansas law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Kansas wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Missouri. If the minor travels to Missouri alone, she must comply with Missouri’s forced parental involvement law but not Kansas’ law. However, if she travels to Missouri with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both Kansas and Missouri. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Kansas and Missouri. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must provide actual notice to one parent in order to comply with Kansas law and obtain informed written consent from one parent in order to comply with Missouri law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Kansas Providers
    Under CCPA, Kansas health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Kansas provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Kansas provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Kansas health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    KAN. STAT. ANN. §§ 65-6701, 65-6705 (1999)
    MO. REV. STAT. § 188.028 (2000)

    Kentucky

    The Law in Kentucky Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Kentucky, she must obtain the informed written consent of a parent or legal guardian. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Kentucky’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of one parent and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Kentucky minors to comply with Kentucky law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Kentucky Resident Minors
    Kentucky minors seeking abortions in Kentucky will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Kentucky forced parental involvement law.

    Kentucky minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Kentucky, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Kentucky law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Kentucky may want to be close to family in Arkansas when she obtains an abortion. If the minor travels to Arkansas alone, she must comply with Arkansas’ forced parental involvement law but not Kentucky’s law. However, if she travels to Arkansas with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both states. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain consent from one parent in order to comply with Kentucky law and notify both parents in order to comply with Arkansas law.

    The effect of CCPA on Kentucky Providers
    Under CCPA, Kentucky health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Kentucky provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Kentucky provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Kentucky health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    KY. REV. STAT. ANN. § 311.732 (Michie 2000)
    ARK. CODE ANN. § 20-16-801, et seq. (Michie 1999)

    Louisiana

    The Law in Louisiana Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Louisiana, she must obtain a notarized statement of consent from one parent, a legal guardian or tutor. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Louisiana’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of one parent and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Louisiana minors to comply with Louisiana law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Louisiana Resident Minors
    Louisiana minors seeking abortions in Louisiana will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Louisiana forced parental involvement law.

    Louisiana minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Louisiana, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Louisiana law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Louisiana wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Mississippi. If the minor travels to Mississippi alone, she must comply with Mississippi’s forced parental involvement law but not Louisiana’s law. However, if she travels to Mississippi with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Louisiana and Mississippi. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain a notarized statement of consent from one parent in order to comply with Louisiana law and obtain written consent from both parents in order to comply with Mississippi law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Louisiana Providers
    Under CCPA, Louisiana health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Louisiana provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Louisiana provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Louisiana health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    LA. REV. STAT. ANN. § 40:1299.35.5 (West 2001)
    MISS. CODE ANN. § 41-41-51, et seq. (2001)

    Massachusetts

    The Law in Massachusetts Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Massachusetts, she must obtain written consent from one parent. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she has married or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Massachusetts’ law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of one parent and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandmother or an aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Massachusetts minors to comply with Massachusetts law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Massachusetts Resident Minors
    Massachusetts minors seeking abortions in Massachusetts will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Massachusetts forced parental involvement law. Massachusetts minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Massachusetts, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with Massachusetts law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, a minor from Massachusetts may want to be close to family in Mississippi when she obtains an abortion. If the minor travels to Mississippi alone, she must comply with Mississippi’s forced parental involvement law but not Massachusetts’s law. However, if she travels to Mississippi with a trusted relative, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both states. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain written consent from one parent to comply with Massachusetts law and obtain written consent from both parents to comply with Mississippi law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Massachusetts Providers
    Under CCPA, Massachusetts health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Massachusetts provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Massachusetts provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Massachusetts health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 112, § 12S (2000)
    MISS. CODE ANN. § 41-41-51, et seq. (2001)

    Michigan

    The Law in Michigan Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Michigan, she must obtain written consent from one parent or a legal guardian. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Michigan’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of one parent and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandmother or an aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Michigan minors to comply with Michigan law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Michigan Resident Minors
    Michigan minors seeking abortions in Michigan will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Michigan forced parental involvement law.

    Michigan minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Michigan, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Michigan law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Michigan wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Ohio. If the minor travels to Ohio alone, she must comply with Ohio’s forced parental involvement law but not Michigan’s law. However, if she travels to Ohio with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both Michigan and Ohio. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Michigan and Ohio. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Michigan law and provide twenty-four hours actual notice to one parents in order to comply with Ohio law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Michigan Providers
    Under CCPA, Michigan health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Michigan provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Michigan provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Michigan health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    MICH. COMP. LAWS § 722.901, et seq. (2000)
    OHIO REV. CODE ANN. § 2919.12 (West 2000)

    Minnesota

    The Law in Minnesota Pertaining to Minors’Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Minnesota, she must give written notice to both parents, guardian(s) or conservator(s) at least forty-eight hours before the abortion is to be performed. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental notice if she is emancipated; if she declares that she is a victim of sexual abuse, neglect, or physical abuse; or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Minnesota’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it does not allow for notification to a person other than a parent, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Minnesota minors to comply with Minnesota law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Minnesota Resident Minors
    Minnesota minors seeking abortions in Minnesota will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Minnesota forced parental involvement law.

    Minnesota minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Minnesota, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Minnesota law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Minnesota wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to North Dakota. If the minor travels to North Dakota alone, she must comply with North Dakota’s forced parental involvement law but not Minnesota’s law. However, if she travels to North Dakota with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in Minnesota and North Dakota. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must give written notice to both parents forty-eight hours prior to an abortion in order to comply with Minnesota law and obtain written consent from both parents in order to comply with North Dakota law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Minnesota Providers
    Under CCPA, Minnesota health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Minnesota provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Minnesota provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Minnesota health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    MINN. STAT. § 144.343 (2000)
    N.D. CENT. CODE § 14-02.1- 03.1 (1999)

    Mississippi

    The Law in Mississippi Pertaining to Minors’Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Mississippi, she must obtain written consent from both parents or a legal guardian. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Mississippi’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of both parents and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Mississippi minors to comply with Mississippi law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Mississippi Resident Minors
    Mississippi minors seeking abortions in Mississippi will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Mississippi forced parental involvement law.

    Mississippi minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Mississippi, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Mississippi law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Mississippi wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Louisiana. If the minor travels to Louisiana alone, she must comply with Louisiana’s forced parental involvement law but not Mississippi’s law. However, if she travels to Louisiana with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both Mississippi and Louisiana. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Mississippi and Louisiana. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain written consent from both parents in order to comply with Mississippi law and she must obtain a notarized statement of consent from one parent in order to comply with Louisiana law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Mississippi Providers
    Under CCPA, Mississippi health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Mississippi provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Mississippi provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Mississippi health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    MISS. CODE ANN. § 41-41-51, et seq. (2001)
    LA. REV. STAT. ANN. § 40:1299.35.5 (West 2001)

    Missouri

    The Law in Missouri Pertaining to Minors’Access to Abortion If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Missouri, she must obtain written consent from one parent or guardian. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Missouri’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of both parents and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Missouri minors to comply with Missouri law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Missouri Resident Minors
    Missouri minors seeking abortions in Missouri will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Missouri forced parental involvement law.

    Missouri minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Missouri, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Missouri law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory a variety of state laws or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Missouri wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Kansas. If the minor travels to Kansas alone, she must comply with Kansas’ forced parental involvement law but not Missouri’s law. However, if she travels to Kansas with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both Missouri and Kansas. Therefore if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Missouri and Mississippi. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Missouri law and provide actual notice to one parent in order to comply with Kansas law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Missouri Providers
    Under CCPA, Missouri health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Missouri provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Missouri provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Missouri health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    MO. REV. STAT. § 188.028 (2000)
    KAN. STAT. ANN. § 65-6705 (1999)

    Nebraska

    The Law in Nebraska Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Nebraska, she must give written notice to one parent or guardian at least forty-eight hours before the abortion is performed. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental notice if she is emancipated; if she declares that she is a victim of abuse, sexual abuse, or abuse and neglect; or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Nebraska’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it does not allow notification to any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Nebraska minors to comply with Nebraska law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted non-parents who would accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Nebraska Resident Minors
    Nebraska minors seeking abortions in Nebraska will have to continue to comply with Nebraska forced parental involvement law.

    Nebraska minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Nebraska. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Nebraska law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory a variety of state laws or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Nebraska wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Iowa. If the minor travels to Iowa alone, she must comply with Iowa’s forced parental involvement law but not Nebraska’s. However, if she travels to Iowa with a relative, she must comply with the laws in both Nebraska and Iowa. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both states. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain a notarized statement of consent from one parent forty-eight hours before the abortion to comply with Nebraska law and she must provide written notice to a parent or grandparent forty-eight hours before the abortion to comply with Iowa law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Nebraska Providers
    Under CCPA, Nebraska health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Nebraska provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Nebraska provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Nebraska health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    NEB. REV. STAT. § 71-6901, et seq. (2000)
    IOWA CODE ANN. § 135L.3 (West 2000)

    North Dakota

    The Law in North Dakota Pertaining to Minors’Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in North Dakota, she must obtain written consent from both parents, the custodial parent, or the legal guardians. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent only if she is married or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    North Dakota’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of both parents and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require North Dakota minors to comply with North Dakota law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on North Dakota Resident Minors
    North Dakota minors seeking abortions in North Dakota will have to comply – as they currently do – with the North Dakota forced parental involvement law.

    North Dakota minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider will have to comply – as they currently do – with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of North Dakota, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with a variety of state laws or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory.

    For example, if a minor from North Dakota wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Minnesota. If the minor travels to Minnesota alone, she must comply with Minnesota’s forced parental involvement law but not North Dakota’s law. However, if she travels to Minnesota with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both North Dakota and Minnesota. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain a written consent from one parent in order to comply with North Dakota law and give written notice to both parents forty-eight hours prior to having an abortion in order to comply with Minnesota law.

    The Effect of CCPA on North Dakota Providers
    Under CCPA, North Dakota health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a North Dakota provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a North Dakota provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, North Dakota health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    N.D. CENT. CODE § 14-02.1-03.1 (1999)
    MINN. STAT. § 144.343 (2000)

    Pennsylvania

    The Law in Pennsylvania Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Pennsylvania, she must obtain written consent from one parent, guardian or adult person standing in loco parentis. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Pennsylvania’ law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of one parent and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Pennsylvania minors to comply with Pennsylvania law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Pennsylvania Resident Minors
    Pennsylvania minors seeking abortions in Pennsylvania will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Pennsylvania forced parental involvement law.

    Pennsylvania minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Pennsylvania, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Pennsylvania law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Pennsylvania wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Ohio. If the minor travels to Ohio alone, she must comply with Ohio’s law but not Pennsylvania’s law. However, if she travels to Ohio with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Pennsylvania and Ohio. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Pennsylvania law and provide 24 hours actual notice to one parent in order to comply with Ohio law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Pennsylvania Providers
    Under CCPA, Pennsylvania health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Pennsylvania provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Pennsylvania provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Pennsylvania health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    18 PA. CONS. ANN. § 3206 (West 2000)
    OHIO REV. CODE ANN. § 2919.12 (West 2000)

    Rhode Island

    The Law in Rhode Island Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Rhode Island, she must obtain consent from one parent or legal guardian. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Rhode Island’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent from one parent and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandmother or an aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Rhode Island minors to comply with Rhode Island law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Rhode Island Resident Minors
    Rhode Island minors seeking abortions in Rhode Island will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Rhode Island forced parental involvement law.

    Rhode Island minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Rhode Island, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with Rhode Island law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, a minor from Rhode Island may want to be close to family in Mississippi when she obtains an abortion. If the minor travels to Mississippi alone, she must comply with Mississippi’s forced parental involvement law but not Rhode Island’s law. However, if she travels to Mississippi with a trusted relative, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both states. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Rhode Island law and obtain written consent from both parents in order to comply with Mississippi law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Rhode Island Providers
    Under CCPA, Rhode Island health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Rhode Island provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Rhode Island provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Rhode Island health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    R.I. GEN. LAWS § 23-4.7-6 (2000)
    MISS. CODE ANN. § 41-41-51, et seq. (2001)



    South Dakota

    The Law in South Dakota Pertaining to Minors’Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in South Dakota, she must give written notice to one parent, guardian, or conservator at least forty-eight hours before the abortion is performed. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental notification only if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    South Dakota’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of both parents and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require South Dakota minors to comply with South Dakota law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on South Dakota Resident Minors
    South Dakota minors seeking abortions in South Dakota will have to comply – as they currently do – with the South Dakota forced parental involvement law.

    South Dakota minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of South Dakota, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with South Dakota law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from South Dakota wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Wyoming. If the minor travels to Wyoming alone, she must comply with Wyoming’s forced parental involvement law but not South Dakota’s law. However, if she travels to Wyoming with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both South Dakota and Wyoming. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must give written notice to one parent at least forty-eight hours before the abortion is performed in order to comply with South Dakota law and she must obtain written consent from one parent at least forty-eight hours prior to the abortion in order to comply with Wyoming law.

    The Effect of CCPA on South Dakota Providers
    Under CCPA, South Dakota health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a South Dakota provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a South Dakota provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, South Dakota health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    S.D. CODIFIED LAWS § 34-23A-1, et seq. (Michie 2000)
    WYO. STAT. ANN. §§ 35-6-101, et seq. (Michie 2000)

    Tennessee

    The Law in Tennessee Pertaining to Minors’Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Tennessee, she must obtain written consent from one parent or legal guardian. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from such a requirement.

    Tennessee’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires consent of one parent and does not allow consent to be obtained from any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Tennessee minors to comply with Tennessee law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Tennessee Resident Minors
    Tennessee minors seeking abortions in Tennessee will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Tennessee forced parental involvement law.

    Tennessee minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Tennessee, her home state. The out-of state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Tennessee law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Tennessee wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Arkansas. If the minor travels to Arkansas alone, she must comply with Arkansas’ law but not Tennessee’s law. However, if she travels to Arkansas with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both Tennessee and Arkansas. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Tennessee and Arkansas. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Tennessee law and provide actual notice to both parents forty-eight hours prior to the abortion in order to comply with Arkansas law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Tennessee Providers
    Under CCPA, Tennessee health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Tennessee provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Tennessee provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Tennessee health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    TENN. CODE ANN. § 37-10-301, et seq. (2000)
    CODE ANN. § 20-16-801-808 (Michie 1999)

    Texas

    The Law in Texas Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Texas, she must provide actual notice to one parent, guardian or conservator at least forty-eight hours before the abortion is to be performed. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Texas’ law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it does not allow notification to a person other than a parent, such as a grandmother or an aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Texas minors to comply with Texas law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Texas Resident Minors
    Texas minors seeking abortions in Texas will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Texas forced parental involvement law.

    Texas minors who are accompanied by a non-parent to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Texas, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Texas law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, if a minor from Texas wants to obtain an abortion from the closest provider, she may need to go to Louisiana. If the minor travels to Louisiana alone, she must comply with Louisiana’s forced parental involvement law but not Texas’ law. However, if she travels to Louisiana with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both Texas and Louisiana. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both states. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must provide actual notice to a parent at least forty-eight hours before the abortion in order to comply with Texas law and obtain a notarized statement of consent from one parent in order to comply with Louisiana law. If the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the non-parent and the abortion provider risk criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    The Effect of CCPA on Texas Providers
    Under CCPA, Texas health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Texas provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Texas provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Texas health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 33.001, et seq. (Vernon 1999)
    LA. REV. STAT. ANN. § 40:1299.35.5 (West 2001)

    Utah

    The Law in Utah Pertaining to Minors’Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Utah, she must provide notification to both parents or a guardian.

    Utah’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it does not allow for notification to a person other than a parent, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Utah minors to comply with Utah law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Utah Resident Minors
    Utah minors seeking abortions in Utah will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Utah forced parental involvement law.

    Utah minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider will have to comply – as they currently do – with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Utah, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with a variety of state laws or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory.

    For example, a minor from Utah may want to be close to family in Minnesota when she obtains an abortion. If the minor travels to Minnesota alone, she must comply with Minnesota’s forced parental involvement law but not Utah’s law. However, if she travels to Minnesota with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor chooses to involve her parents, she must notify both parents in order to comply with Utah law and she must give written notice to both parents at least forty-eight hours prior to having an abortion in order to comply with Minnesota law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Utah Providers
    Under CCPA, Utah health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Utah provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Utah provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Utah health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    UTAH CODE ANN. § 76-7-304 (2000)
    MINN. STAT. § 144.343 (2000)

    Virginia

    The Law in Virginia Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Virginia, she must provide actual notice to one parent, legal guardian, or other person standing in loco parentis to the minor at least twenty-four hours before an abortion. A minor may obtain an abortion without parental notification if she is emancipated, if she declares that she is abused or neglected, or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Virginia’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it does not allow for notification to any person other than a parent, such as a grandmother or an aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Virginia minors to comply with Virginia law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Virginia Resident Minors
    Virginia minors seeking abortions in Virginia will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Virginia forced parental involvement law.

    Virginia minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Virginia, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with and ready to comply with Virginia law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, a minor from Virginia may have family in Pennsylvania and want to be close to them when she obtains an abortion. If the minor travels to Pennsylvania alone, she must comply with Pennsylvania’s forced parental involvement law but not Virginia’s law. However, if she travels to Pennsylvania with a non-parent, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor seeks an exemption from the forced parental involvement laws, she must obtain orders from courts in both Virginia and Pennsylvania. If she chooses to involve her parents, she must provide actual notice to one parent at least twenty-four hours before the abortion in order to comply with Virginia law and obtain written consent from one parent in order to comply with Pennsylvania law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Virginia Providers Under CCPA, Virginia health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Virginia provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Virginia provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Virginia health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    VA. CODE ANN. § 16.1-241 (v) (Michie 2000)
    18 PA. CONS. ANN. § 3206 (West 2000)

    Wyoming

    The Law in Wyoming Pertaining to Minors’ Access to Abortion
    If a minor under the age of 18 wishes to obtain an abortion in Wyoming, she must provide written notification to and obtain written consent from one parent or guardian at least forty-eight hours before the abortion and obtain written consent from one parent or guardian. A minor may obtain an abortion without consent if she is emancipated or if she obtains a court order exempting her from the requirement.

    Wyoming’s law is considered a “parental involvement law” under CCPA’s definition because it requires notification of one parent and does not allow notification to any other person, such as a grandparent or aunt. Therefore, CCPA would require Wyoming minors to comply with Wyoming law in other states if minors wanted to protect trusted relatives or friends who accompany them to out-of-state abortion providers from the possibility of a federal criminal prosecution.

    The Effect of CCPA on Wyoming Resident Minors
    Wyoming minors seeking abortions in Wyoming will have to comply – as they currently do – with the Wyoming forced parental involvement law.

    Wyoming minors who are accompanied by a trusted relative or friend to an out-of-state abortion provider must comply with the forced parental involvement law of the state to which she travels, if there is such a law. CCPA adds an additional burden: the minor must also comply with the law of Wyoming, her home state. The out-of-state abortion provider, therefore, must be familiar with Wyoming law, as well as the laws of every state in the nation which are as strict as CCPA or risk criminal liability as a conspirator, accomplice or accessory. In addition, if the minor fails to comply with the laws of both states, the minor’s companion risks criminal and civil penalties under CCPA.

    For example, a minor from Wyoming may have family in Utah and want to be close to them when she obtains an abortion. If the minor travels to Utah alone, she must comply with Utah’s forced parental involvement law but not Wyoming’s law. However, if she travels to Utah with a trusted relative or friend, she must comply with the laws in both states. Therefore, if the minor chooses to involve her parents, she must notify both parents in order to comply with Utah law and she must give actual notice to both parents at least forty-eight hours prior to having an abortion to comply with Minnesota law.

    The Effect of CCPA on Wyoming Providers
    Under CCPA, Wyoming health care providers who know that a minor has been transported across state lines by a non-parent would be at risk from a number of complex provisions regarding conspiracy, accomplice and accessory liability. In order to avoid liability, a Wyoming provider would have to determine whether the minor seeking an abortion is from another state; whether she was accompanied across state lines by a non-parent; whether, under CCPA, she is required to comply with the forced parental involvement law of her home state and, if so, whether she did. If a Wyoming provider determines a violation of another state’s law exists, the provider would be forced to deny services to the minor and report the accompanying person to the authorities or risk liability himself.

    Therefore, Wyoming health care providers would need to be familiar with, and be ready to comply with, the laws of all fifty states and the District of Columbia before proceeding with an abortion.

    WYO. STAT. ANN. §§ 35-6-101, et seq. (Michie 2000)
    UTAH CODE ANN. § 76-7-304 (2000)



































    About CRLP
    On the Hill
    In the Courts
    Worldwide
    Publications
    Press
    Newsletter: RFN