Subtle Policy Shift Reflects New U.S. Strategy on
Cuba
Sun-Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, FL) June 1,
2002 Saturday Broward Metro Edition
By Rafael Lorente Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON-Despite the hard-line bluster of President
Bush's policy pronouncements on Cuba, the administration has
adopted a subtle but possibly significant new strategy,
offering to ease sanctions while Fidel Castro is still in
power if free and fair elections for the National Assembly are
held next year.
Worried that the message did not get
out clearly last month when Bush gave his Cuba policy speeches
in Washington and Miami, a senior State Department official
reiterated the new strategy in a background briefing with
reporters this week.
Nobody expects Castro to meet the
U.S. conditions, but the subtle shift seems designed to make
the administration's position more moderate in the eyes of
farm-state legislators who want to eliminate the embargo,
while retaining the support of Florida's Cuban-American
community. It also shifts the Cuba policy debate to Cuba and
its political and economic system. "There's a real feeling
that the [Cuba] policy hasn't worked and they're looking for
new ways to make it work," a second State Department official
said Friday. "They're being flexible. It's definitely not
trying to find new ways to hit Cuba with a hammer."
The
second State Department official said the new rhetoric does
not represent a change in policy, which still calls for
democracy in Cuba. Instead, the senior official said, it is
another way of achieving that goal.
Bush's defense of
the embargo last month was in sharp contrast to former
President Jimmy Carter, who had just returned from Havana,
where he called for an end to sanctions.
The briefing
this week at the State Department took some Cuba watchers by
surprise, according to a congressional source. Even Bush's
speech on May 20 surprised some. According to the
congressional source, hard-line anti-Castro Republican
representatives Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen
were not informed the speech would have such
language.
Some anti-Castro hard-liners oppose the idea
because it could legitimize the Castro government and Cuba's
communist constitution.
Lifting the embargo, or easing
some of its provisions, while Castro is still in power would
require cooperation from Congress. Under the terms of the 1996
Helms-Burton law, the four-decade embargo can't be lifted
until Cuba has committed to free elections, an independent
judiciary and a transitional government that "shall not
include Fidel or Raul Castro."
But most agree the offer
from Bush is likely to mean very little. Cuba probably will
not agree to a vote, as Cuban National Assembly President
Ricardo Alarcon made clear soon after Bush's appearance in
Miami last month.
Rafael Lorente can be reached at
rlorente@sun-sentinel.com or 202-824-8225 in
Washington.
Copyright 2002 Company
Related: