Despite a nearly stagnant economy, the government's
finances are remarkably sound. The budget's enormous surpluses have
allowed us to deliver significant tax relief to working Americans,
providing badly needed fiscal stimulus to counteract the year-long
slowdown in the economy. Even while weathering the slowdown and taking
action on tax relief, we continue to take in huge surplus revenues, and to
use the extra receipts to steadily reduce the nation's outstanding
debt.
The current estimate for the 2001 surplus is $158
billion, the second highest in history. This is lower than the $281
billion surplus estimated in the April Budget. The lower surplus is due
largely to the year-long economic slowdown and the decision to incorporate
immediate fiscal stimulus, in the Economic Growth and Tax Relief
Reconciliation Act. The 2002 surplus projection is $173 billion, compared
to April's $231 billion estimate. Over the 10 years from 2002 to 2011, the
surplus totals $3,113 billion, down from the $3,433 billion estimated in
April.
Both this year and next year, the overall budget
surpluses are equal to the surpluses generated by Social Security payroll
taxes (and interest earnings). The President and Congress are both
committed to preserving the Social Security surplus for debt reduction. As
a result, the additional surplus available for new spending or further tax
relief in the next few years is limited. In order to fully reserve the
Social Security surplus for debt reduction, any further initiatives beyond
those included in this review will also have to be accompanied by offsets
in other areas.
Tax Relief for Working Americans
From the Administration's first day in office, President
Bush worked to deliver on his campaign promise of meaningful tax relief.
This package, which was originally crafted to ensure long-term economic
growth and to return excess surplus funds to taxpayers, became even more
urgent as the extent of the economic slowdown became apparent. Congress
moved with exceptional speed in response to the President's plan. On June
7, 2001 the President signed the Economic Growth and Tax Relief
Reconciliation Act of 2001.
This historic measure of tax relief reduces the bottom
marginal tax rate from 15 percent to 10 percent, delivering savings to
every income taxpayer, and reduces the top rate to a maximum of 35
percent. It also doubles the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000,
enhances incentives for investment in education, eliminates the marriage
penalty, phases out the death tax, and encourages retirement saving.
Of immediate importance, the tax measure includes a
rebate provision that puts $38 billion in savings from the new 10 percent
bracket quickly and directly back in the taxpayers' hands. The rebate
checks, which taxpayers are receiving in the months of July, August, and
September, could not have come at a better time to invigorate today's
shaky economy. Economic growth has slowed steadily for over a year to a
point that it has nearly stopped. The rebate checks will help prevent
further deterioration by supporting consumer spending.
Reserving the Social Security Surplus for Debt
Reduction
A strong bipartisan consensus has arisen in this country,
and in the Congress, to preserve very large surpluses as a threshold
condition of public finance. Both parties and both the Legislative and
Executive Branches, in this Administration and the previous one, have
concurred in maintaining a surplus at least the size of the Social
Security surplus.
Some would set the minimum surplus level even higher,
using as a target the artificial overage in the Medicare Part A trust
fund. This is a relatively modest difference, amounting to a question of
whether the minimum surplus should be more like 8.0 percent or 9.5 percent
of total receipts. It is also a difference that is completely irrelevant
either to the level of future Medicare benefits or to the health of the
trust fund financing those benefits, which will be exactly the same size
regardless of the level of the overall budget surplus. (For further
discussion, see the Medicare
section of this document.)
There are several reasons that the Social Security
surplus makes a good surplus target. First, unlike Medicare, which costs
much more than it takes in, Social Security is in true surplus for the
moment. Second, the Administration and a majority of Americans hope for
reform that converts a portion of Social Security receipts from mere IOUs
to real assets, owned by the worker who paid those taxes. At that point,
the notion of a Social Security "lockbox" will take on real, literal
meaning.
The final reason for choosing this surplus target is that
it permits the Treasury to achieve—with some room to spare—the maximum
amount of debt retirement possible. Over the next 10 years, Social
Security will take in excess funds of $2.5 trillion, whereas maximum debt
retireable without incurring unjustifiable premium expenses is between
$2.0 trillion and $2.2 trillion. This year, the Treasury will eliminate
well over $100 billion of existing debt, marking the fourth year in a row
of such reductions. Further such reductions are scheduled for each
succeeding year. This is an important accomplishment for which both
political parties, both branches of government, and both the current and
prior administrations deserve credit.
The update of the budget outlook in this Mid-Session
Review foresees continued large surpluses above the size of the Social
Security surplus for all years in the budget horizon. The President is
determined to preserve surpluses at this level, and to continue using
these funds for the steady reduction of outstanding publicly held
debt.
Changes in the Economic and Budget Outlook Since
April
Since the President submitted his budget in April, the
extent of the economic slowdown has become more evident. In retrospect,
its length and depth are clear: the stock market began to fall in March,
2000; manufacturing employment in August, 2000; and GDP growth in the
third quarter of 2000. Overall, the economy has grown at only a 1.3
percent rate since the second quarter of last year, including an estimated
0.7 percent annual growth rate in the most recently completed quarter. As
discussed in a subsequent section of this review, the Administration—and
other forecasters—believe that recent interest rate cuts by the Federal
Reserve, coupled with the fiscal stimulus from the Economic Growth and Tax
Relief Reconciliation Act, will spur the economy back to solid,
sustainable growth by next year.
Economic weakness, coupled with the tax rebate action
that is designed to counteract that weakness, results in a lower surplus
outlook this year and next year. In the current year, economic revisions
and technical factors reduce the surplus $46 billion from the April
estimate, a difference of about two percent of receipts. Tax rebates and
related provisions account for $40 billion, a legislated shift in timing
of corporation income tax receipts reduces the surplus another $28
billion, and supplemental spending for meeting national defense and other
needs uses $5 billion. This combination of factors and a technical
adjustment described below still leaves a very small on-budget surplus for
2001.
In 2002, economic and technical revisions are slightly
smaller than in 2001. The effect of the tax relief provisions stays level
at about $40 billion, while the shift of corporate receipts is recaptured.
The net result is a small on-budget surplus.
One factor artificially reducing the 2001 on-budget
surplus from the April estimate is an upward revision to the Social
Security trust fund due to reestimates of payroll taxes paid in previous
years. As explained in the accompanying box, this practice has the effect
of inflating the current Social Security surplus by adding credits during
2001 for taxes actually paid and collected in 2000, 1999, and earlier
years. This reduces the apparent 2001 on-budget surplus by $6 billion.
Correcting this distortion by assigning the extra revenues to their
appropriate year makes clear that there is a small on-budget surplus in
2001. OMB will review with the Department of the Treasury the possibility
of prospective changes to record the adjustments in the correct years.
Over the full 10-year budget horizon, the surplus outlook
is relatively unchanged from April. The unified surplus total for 2002
through 2011 is now estimated at $3,113 billion, down from the $3,433
billion estimated in the April Budget. The largest factor in the reduction
is incorporating the outyear implications of the Administration's $18.4
billion defense amendment for 2002. This is the first installment,
totaling $209 billion, of investment in restoring our national defense
capabilities after years of neglect. The tax bill, because it was scaled
back during Congressional consideration, increases the surplus slightly
relative to the April Budget (which assumed the President's proposals),
while the 10-year economic and technical adjustments reduce the surplus by
$46 billion.
This update to the President's budget increases the
resources set aside for Medicare modernization, and an integrated
prescription drug benefit, to $190 billion over the period 2004 to 2011.
This new estimate is consistent with the Framework to Strengthen Medicare
that the President announced on July 12th and is $37 billion more than was
allocated in total to additional Medicare spending in the April Budget
submission over 10 years.
The President's April Budget proposed a program to help
low income seniors and those with particularly high prescription drug
costs get immediate assistance while Congress considered comprehensive
reform. However, with the President's support, a consensus is now building
in Congress which focuses on comprehensive Medicare modernization. The
President's Framework to Strengthen Medicare and his budget reflect this
emerging agreement, setting aside substantial resources to meet this
objective which could be implemented as soon as 2004. The Administration
is committed to continuing to work with the Congress on enacting
legislation to strengthen Medicare consistent with the President's
framework.
Although the Administration is committed to enacting
comprehensive Medicare legislation soon, the President believes we must
help seniors get the prescription drugs they need at an affordable price
now. That is why the Administration has begun the voluntary Medicare
Prescription Drug Discount Card program. This program will allow seniors
access to the same kinds of drug discounts that other Americans with good
private health insurance currently receive. The President believes that
seniors, who face the heaviest burden for prescription drug costs, should
not also have to pay the highest retail prices for drugs. The discount
card is not a substitute for prescription drug coverage in a reformed
Medicare system, but it will bring important relief to seniors who need it
beginning next year.
Of the current 10-year total surplus, $2,538 billion is
from the Social Security trust fund, down slightly from $2,583 billion in
April. As noted above, the Administration is devoting as much of this
amount as possible to the reduction of publicly held debt. After reserving
the Social Security surplus, the remaining 10-year surplus is $575
billion, down from $850 billion in April, with most of this difference
attributed to the $198 billion increase in spending on national defense
and the additional commitment to Medicare.
The government's finances are extremely sound. Only
persistent, long-term economic weakness can threaten this position. Hence,
promoting a return to vigorous growth must be our common objective. The
best course forward is clear: first, we must contain spending over the
coming year.
Last year's appropriations, agreed to 8 months ago by the
last Congress and the last President, contained the largest one-year
spending increase in history, about $50 billion over 2000. Obviously, a
smaller surge in spending last year would have ensured a larger surplus
today. The spending growth rates of 1999 through 2001 cannot be repeated
if we are to preserve the on-budget surpluses that we have all worked so
hard to create. Congress must limit this year's appropriations to the
level of the 2002 Budget Resolution, including the defense amendment
recently proposed by the President.
Second, Congress and the President must work together to
continue restraining total spending in the next few years. Businesses,
states, cities, and families do not hesitate to limit their spending when
revenues diminish. The fifty state governments recently reported that
collectively they are lowering spending growth from 8 percent last year to
a more sustainable 3-1/2 percent in 2002. Spending in the federal domestic
agencies exploded during the last three years, including growth of 45
percent at the Department of Health and Human Services and 27 percent at
Department of Transportation. These departments can benefit from a period
of digestion without great growth beyond these expanded levels.
The Administration is prepared where necessary to extend
the principle of restraint to its own high priority initiatives. The
Administration continues to propose several tax initiatives from the April
Budget, with the effective dates delayed two years until January 1, 2004.
In addition, the Administration proposes to fund other initiatives that
can not be delayed within the additional discretionary resources provided
in the budget resolution, and will work with Congress to revise these
proposals as necessary to ensure their enactment.
There are a number of other items that may place demands
on the budget. Consistent with the requirements of the Budget Enforcement
Act, action on these or other items with additional costs to the budget
must be accompanied by provisions to offset the costs to ensure that no
automatic reductions are triggered. Alternatively additional requirements
could be funded within the discretionary levels agreed to in the
Congressional Budget Resolution including the defense amendment recently
proposed by the President. Living within these constraints will ensure
that the Social Security surplus is protected and can be fully reserved
for debt reduction. Examples of these further requirements include:
-
Farm bill. The costs of the farm bill now moving
through Congress, which restructures farm programs through the next
several years, will have to be offset where necessary to maintain
on-budget surplus.
-
Tax provisions. Several long-standing tax
credits and other provisions expire at the end of 2001. The
Administration supports the extension of these provisions in a fiscally
responsible manner and looks forward to working with Congress to achieve
that goal. These expiring provisions include Archer Medical Savings
Accounts, the work opportunity tax credit, the welfare-to-work tax
credit, provisions dealing with the minimum tax for individuals, and the
treatment of active financial services income of foreign
subsidiaries.
-
Railroad Retirement Investment Trust. The
House-passed Railroad Retirement and Survivors' Improvement Act (HR
1140) would authorize a new federal trust fund to purchase stocks and
bonds. The purchases could amount to $15 billion. Under long-standing
budget scoring rules, these purchases would be scored as outlays, the
same as purchases of stocks, bonds, and any other asset by all agencies
within the federal government. However, section 105 of the House-passed
bill directs OMB and CBO not to score outlays for these
purchases.
Regardless of how the purchases are scored, Treasury
would have to pay for them in the same way—by using some of the budget
surplus that otherwise would be used to redeem debt held by the public. If
all of the purchases were made in 2002, they would exceed the non-Social
Security surplus by $14 billion. Treasury would have to use $14 billion of
the surplus generated by Social Security to finance the remainder.
This Mid-Session Review presumes a policy of fiscal
restraint, but restraint does not mean paralysis. The President's
management initiatives and the on-going review of programs at all levels
will result in our ability to do more with the same or similar resources.
In government, as in any business or family, the burden of proof must be
placed on spending proponents to demonstrate the ongoing value received
for whatever money is being spent today. Any healthy organization
constantly searches for ways to redeploy money from less efficient to more
efficient purposes, and it is past time for the federal government to
adopt this outlook. We expect that improvements in managing resources that
are already underway will pay greater dividends than the exclusive focus
on incremental new resources. Excellence is defined by continuing to raise
the bar of performance and achievement.