E-mail this statement
For information call: 202-224-3041



Graham Announces New Prescription Drug Plan


May 1, 2002

WASHINGTON (May 1, 2002) – Senator Bob Graham, D-Florida, today announced a new plan to provide America's seniors with affordable prescription drug coverage. Graham was joined at a press conference in the Capitol by Senator Zell Miller, D-Georgia, who will be a co-sponsor of Graham's bill.

"This proposal covers all the bases – it is universal, comprehensive, affordable and accessible. By providing seniors a real prescription drug benefit, we will give them one of the most effective treatment options available," said Graham. "The addition of a prescription drug benefit to Medicare is the most important reform we can make to the program." The proposal, which provides universal prescription drug coverage for all Medicare recipients, includes these elements:

• A $25 per month premium for drug coverage.

• An immediate benefit with no deductible.

• The government will pay at least 50 percent of the cost of a prescription, with no gaps or holes in coverage, with a $4,000 annual cap on out-of-pocket expenditures. This might be converted to a "co-pay" formula similar to that offered by private health insurance plans.

• There would be no premium or cost-sharing for beneficiaries with incomes below 135% of the poverty level. Premiums would be reduced for beneficiaries with incomes between 135-150% of poverty.

Additional details are available in the attached fact sheet.

The Graham-Miller initiative is supported by AARP. In a letter to Graham dated today, William D. Novelli, AARP's CEO and executive director, said: "In our view, this plan could provide real value to beneficiaries in protecting them against the high costs of prescription drugs. We want to work with you to assure that a prescription drug benefit is a permanent and stable part of Medicare and includes adequate cost containment measures."

Graham's proposal builds on the legislation (S. 1135) that he filed last year.

FACT SHEET The Medicare Outpatient Prescription Drug Act of 2002

The MEDICARE OUTPATIENT PRESCRIPTION DRUG ACT OF 2002 guarantees access to affordable prescription drugs for all Medicare beneficiaries. This legislation adds complete coverage -- with no gaps or limits -- of prescription drugs beginning in the first year the benefit is offered.

Voluntary, Accessible, Integrated Coverage For All Beneficiaries

• While all beneficiaries are eligible for the new Medicare benefit, it is voluntary.

• The benefit is integrated into the Medicare program to ensure it’s availability to all beneficiaries; access is guaranteed in every region of the country.

Comprehensive Standard Benefit With Fully-Defined Stop-Loss Protection

• Beneficiaries would pay a $25 monthly premium.

• Assistance would begin with the first prescription filled of the year - the Medicare program would pay an equivalent of at least 50% of the cost of each prescription up to the stop-loss level.

• A defined stop-loss benefit: after $4,000 in out-of-pocket expenditures, the Medicare program would pick up any remaining expenses, and the beneficiary would pay no coinsurance.

Affordable For All Beneficiaries • Beneficiaries with incomes below 135% of poverty would receive full assistance for their drug premiums and cost-sharing.

• Those with incomes 135-150% of poverty would pay a reduced premium on a sliding scale basis.

Use of the Private Sector to Promote Choice and Competition

• Multiple private sector entities (such as pharmacy benefit managers, health insurers or pharmacies) in each geographic region would administer, manage and deliver the prescription drug benefit. To ensure the cost-effective provision of benefits and to provide maximum flexibility for PBMs, the PBMs would be allowed to use all of the methods they use in the private sector to manage costs.

• Beneficiaries in every part of the country would have access to coverage provided by PBMs that would not assume full insurance risk for drug costs. In this way, adverse selection and inappropriate incentives would be avoided.

• However, to ensure that PBMs pursue and are held accountable for managing costs, high quality beneficiary services, and improved health outcomes, PBMs would be required to put a substantial portion (or all) of their revenues at risk for their performance in containing costs and providing quality service.

• Requiring PBMs to share risk provides a middle ground between proposals that have included no risk being assumed by the private sector, and proposals that have required the assumption of insurance and selection risk for the cost of drugs. This arrangement would bring us the benefits of private sector competition without the instabilities that would be associated with a full risk-bearing model. It would take advantage of the fact that the private sector has provided an efficient, workable, stable system for the delivery of prescription drugs, and the management of drug costs, and would allow beneficiaries to choose between multiple vendors.

• Although all PBMs must offer the standard benefit at a minimum, payments received on the basis of their performance could be used to reduce beneficiary cost-sharing.

Continuation and Expansion of Current Coverage

• Incentives to retain employer-provided coverage are included.

• Medicare HMOs (Medicare+Choice program) would be required to provide, at a minimum, the drug benefit established under this proposal.

• The MOD Act allows continued offering of Medigap plans, however the plans must be modified to compliment, and not duplicate the prescription drug benefit under this Act.

U.S. Senator Bob Graham
Press Conference to Announce A New Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Proposal
May 1, 2002

Introduction

• I am very pleased to be here today with my colleague and friend from Georgia, Zell Miller.

• Soon we will be introducing an improved version of our Medicare prescription drug legislation.

We Can, and Must Enact Legislation This Year

• Conventional wisdom may hold that nothing significant can be enacted in an election year. We don't agree, and intend to prove the naysayers wrong.

• Some want to spend this year trying to out-politic the ‘other side'. Some have their sights set on creating a brand new system for delivering prescription drugs. Some want to allocate scarce resources for unnecessary and unwanted changes to the Medicare program.

• But our goal this year must be passage of a universal, comprehensive, and affordable prescription drug benefit.

Betty Dizik, Broward County

• Betty Dizik is a constituent of mine from Tamarac, (Broward County) Florida . She testified before the Senate HELP Committee almost two years ago. At that time she testified that her drug costs were $400 each month – almost a quarter of her income.

• Here we are, two years later. Betty is now 75, and her drug costs have increased to $700 each month. She was laid off from her job, so is now taking classes in hopes of finding a job as a medical coder.

• She still doesn't have a drug benefit, and she is skipping pills because she can't afford to fill all of her prescriptions.

• She is not interested in election-year soundbites, and she certainly isn't interested in a benefit with a huge gap that will still have her skipping pills, and paying $700 each month – plus her premium – for much of the year.

A Prescription Drug Benefit IS Medicare Reform

• I've heard it said that we can add a drug benefit, but only if we reform the Medicare program. Adding a drug benefit IS the single most important reform we can make to Medicare.

• For thirty-seven years the Medicare program has focused on sickness. It has been successful, and has improved the health of countless seniors.

Now that we are in the 21st century, it is time to reap the full benefits of the advances made over the years, and shift the focus of the Medicare program to one that promotes wellness.

• For that, a prescription drug benefit is mandatory. 90% of seniors have at least one chronic condition; drugs are often the best way to manage those conditions.

New Benefit is Affordable • Our new proposal for a benefit for all Medicare beneficiaries is workable and affordable.

• Last year we listened to seniors respond to our bill, and we heard loud and clear that the premium was not affordable.

• Therefore, our new benefit includes a $25 monthly premium.

• Seniors will receive assistance with the first, and every, prescription of the year: there are no holes in the benefit, and no caps on the benefit.

• Where we do have a cap is on out-of-pocket expenditures. Once a senior has spent $4,000, the Medicare program will pick up the rest of their drug costs.

Our seniors can rest easy knowing that Medicare will be there for them in their most critical time of need.

Drug Benefit Must Be Available For All Seniors

• In addition to being affordable, we need a drug benefit that will actually be available for all seniors -- those in our most remote rural towns, and those in our urban centers.

• According to CBO, our proposal is the only one currently before Congress that does not leave a single Medicare beneficiary without drug coverage.

• How do we do that? By using the system the private sector has in place today for delivering drugs in every part of the country.

This system is already working, and it holds the private sector accountable for containing costs and for delivering high quality care.

It has produced a stable marketplace for working Americans, and would provide the same choices and guarantees for our seniors.

Caution • Let nobody fail to appreciate the scale and complexity of what we are about to do.

• Addition of a prescription drug benefit will be the largest expansion of the Medicare program since it was initiated in 1965.

• This fact challenges Congress to be sure that we get it right.

• In light of the scope of the changes we are making, we are suggesting that there should be a pause to examine how well the benefit is working – is it affordable for seniors? is the delivery structure working? – and to make whatever modifications are necessary and appropriate.

• Therefore, we are calling for a reauthorization of the legislation after 2010.

Conclusion

• Some of our colleagues may disagree with elements of our proposal. Some may think it is too generous, others will think it is too meager. Some may think it relies too heavily on the private sector, others will want the private sector to create a new system.

• But we all know that our seniors cannot afford to wait out another election cycle.

• We urge our colleagues to reject any proposal that does not provide a prescription drug benefit that is guaranteed, affordable, and meaningful.

• At the same time, we urge our colleagues to put aside election year politics and come together over an issue we all realize is long overdue.

-30-