Back to National Journal
19 of 129 results     Previous Story | Next Story | Back to Results List

02-03-2001

WHITE HOUSE: A Different Tack With Congress

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, he quickly went to work on a
signature issue of his presidential campaign-health care reform. He tapped
first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton and White House adviser Ira Magaziner to
head a 500-person task force that ended up sending a detailed 1,300-page
bill to Congress for consideration.

Members of Congress weren't welcomed into the decision-making process -not even Democrats. And they didn't appreciate the snub.

"I was taken aback by how angry many members of Congress were about the presumptiveness of the Clinton Administration," said Gail Wilensky, a Bush adviser who chairs the Medicare Payment Advisory Committee, which advises Congress on Medicare policies. "It was a complete lack of understanding about how Congress works, and the rights Congress believes is theirs, which is passing domestic policy."

Although it's far too early to draw any conclusions, George W. Bush seems to be getting off to a much different start. Like Clinton, Bush is making a health care initiative one of his first priorities-in this case a prescription drug benefit for seniors. Unlike Clinton, he appears willing to let Congress play a prominent role in shaping the legislation, even if it means backing off some proposals he pushed on the campaign trail. Indeed, Bush's prescription drug plan was not in the form of legislation, but a five-page conceptual proposal.

The plan, which Bush sent to Congress on Jan. 29, is intended to provide temporary help to seniors facing rising prescription drug costs while a more permanent solution is devised. The "immediate helping hand" proposal would send block grants to the states to cover the full cost of drug coverage for low-income elderly who are not eligible for Medicaid or retiree benefits. Individuals with incomes up to $11,600 and married couples with incomes up to $15,700 would be eligible. Under the plan, there would be no premium, and co-payments would be "nominal."

Single seniors with incomes up to $15,000 and couples with incomes up to $20,300 would receive a subsidy for at least 50 percent of the premium for coverage. And any Medicare beneficiary whose out-of-pocket spending for prescription drugs exceeded $6,000 a year would be eligible for a state program, with no premium. The federal government would pick up the full cost.

Bush's plan drew quick criticism from Democrats, as well as from some Republicans, in Congress. "While it is well-intentioned, it is not a good one," said Sen. John Breaux, D-La. About half of all states already have prescription assistance programs for seniors in place, and proposals are pending in many others. Critics argue that by the time states get programs up and running, the four-year timetable envisioned for Bush's "helping hand" would have expired.

Even so, members of Congress are giving Bush more slack than they gave Clinton. One reason why is that Bush did not send up his proposal as the Administration's final word on the matter.

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer conveyed the White House's conciliatory tone: "He [Bush] is aware that there are some important people in the Congress who have expressed reservations about it moving as a separate bill, and we'll be pleased to work with them," Fleischer said. "Any proposal that anybody makes on Medicare, whether it's giving prescription drugs to seniors or whether it's structural reforms that involve Part A, Part B, all need to be explored in a fashion that brings Democrats and Republicans together."

Health policy analysts see potential in the Administration's approach. "In engendering a feeling of cooperation, where [Bush] said, `I outline the principles and you outline the details,' it sets the correct tone of cooperation," said Edward F. Howard, executive vice president of the Alliance for Health Reform, a nonpartisan organization that promotes health insurance reform. "The President said, `Look, I'm interested in the outcome and not in the exact dimensions of the process....' It's the focus on results that seems consistent and is the sort of message that a lot of lawmakers from both parties like to hear."

Bush said during the presidential campaign that, after he sent his "helping hand" proposal to Congress, he would establish an Administration task force to decide what to do about broader Medicare reforms. Bush now appears to be backing off on that proposal, and says he's open to allowing Congress to have more of a role.

Before Bush sent his prescription drug plan to Capitol Hill, he met privately with Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas, R-Calif., and said he wasn't wedded to the task-force idea, Grassley said. "He had the feeling it might needlessly slow things up," Grassley said. "We consider this pressure on Congress to do something." Bush met later in the day with nine Republican and seven Democratic Senators to discuss Medicare and other issues.

But whether this cooperation will persist-and carry over to other policy debates-remains to be seen. For starters, Congress hasn't yet begun working on Bush's prescription drug proposal. Moreover, Bush could take a harder-line approach in policy areas where he has invested more energy, such as education and taxes.

Marilyn Werber Serafini National Journal
Need A Reprint Of This Article?
National Journal Group offers both print and electronic reprint services, as well as permissions for academic use, photocopying and republication. Click here to order, or call us at 202-266-7230.

19 of 129 results     Previous Story | Next Story | Back to Results List