Copyright 2001 eMediaMillWorks, Inc.
(f/k/a Federal
Document Clearing House, Inc.)
Federal Document Clearing House
Congressional Testimony
September 26, 2001, Wednesday
SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING TESTIMONY
LENGTH: 2417 words
COMMITTEE:
HOUSE FINANCIAL SERVICES
HEADLINE:
TERRORIST IMPACT ON SECURITIES, INSURANCE INDUSTRY
TESTIMONY-BY: DEAN R. O'HARE,, CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
AFFILIATION: THE CHUBB CORPORATION
BODY: CORRECTED COPY
AMERICA'S INSURANCE
INDUSTRY: KEEPING THE PROMISE
Dean R. O'Hare, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of The Chubb Corporation
SEPTEMBER 26, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Chairman Oxley, Ranking Member LaFalce and members
of the panel, I am Dean R. O'Hare, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The
Chubb Corporation. The Chubb Corporation provides property/casualty insurance
through 135 offices in 32 countries around the world. We specialize in offering
a broad range of insurance products and services for many of the world's leading
industries, among them marine, electronics, financial services,
telecommunications and biotechnology.
While I am pleased to address the
Committee today, it is obviously with deep regret for the circumstances. e at
Chubb, as all Americans and people around the world, express our deepest
sympathy and offer our prayers to all of the victims of the September 11, 2001
tragedy and their families. Mr. Chairman, you have entitled the hearings
"America's Insurance Industry: Keeping the Promise." Your choice of title is not
only uplifting, it is accurate. Very soon after the tragedy, most of the major
insurance companies made it clear: despite any questions or confusions about
possible "war" exclusions, we would keep our promise and pay our claims. As the
leaders of the property/casualty industry, myself included, told President Bush
last Friday: we are not asking for any kind of assistance, help or bailout
concerning compensating the victims of this outrageous attack. The risks are
spread worldwide. The industry will be able to absorb the losses.
Mr.
Chairman, I know the Committee has specific questions it wishes addressed in the
course of this hearing and I will do so. Before directly taking those questions,
however, let me commend you and Mr. LaFalce for responding swiftly and holding
these hearings. Also, we appreciate your noting the industry's positive response
to paying its claims as expeditiously as possible.
Additionally, we
commend Superintendent Serio for taking the leadership in coordinating the
claims process in New York, and for organizing an insurance information center
in lower Manhattan to help victims of the attacks answer questions about
insurance claims procedures, in which we will participate.
I now address
the Committee's specific questions.
THE COMMITTEE'S QUESTIONS
Question 1: How has your company been affected by the September 11
tragedy, and how have you responded?
- First, concerning Chubb, I can
assure that we are well-equipped financially to respond to this tragedy fully
and completely.
Many valued Chubb commercial and personal insurance
customers suffered devastating property losses in this tragedy. In addition,
other types of claims include payments to businesses whose operations have been
interrupted, to cover their ongoing expenses (otherwise known as "business
interruption" or "business income" insurance), workers compensation benefit
payments, accidental death payments to individuals who died while travelling on
business, and personal insurance (homeowners and automobile) losses. On
September 20 Chubb announced that our losses from all coverages related to the
terrorists' acts would be $
500-600 million pre-tax, net of
reinsurance. This translates into $
325 to $
390
million after taxes. Even after this loss, however, we expect to end the year
with a strong balance sheet. We have low debt, strong reserves, strong cash flow
and liquidity. And let me reiterate: we are confident in the quality of our
reinsurers and that our reinsurance will be paid.
The bottom line is
that Chubb will meet its commitments and remain not only financially sound but
also well positioned to embrace the future insurance demands of our customers.
In answer to the second part of your first question, regarding how we
have responded, I first note we began receiving reports almost immediately after
the attacks and began processing claims less than 48 hours later. We were the
first insurer to issue a statement making it clear that we were in the business
of paying claims and keeping our promises - and that we would not invoke the war
risk exclusion.
Chubb, along with the other major insurers, has
attempted to facilitate claims handling to the greatest extent possible. We
continue to place large, clear ads in the major newspapers directing customers
to their agents, brokers and 800 numbers to expedite claims handling.
Chubb is focusing on these claims at the highest level. We have
activated our catastrophe center and have dispatched a cadre of our most
talented people throughout New York, New Jersey and Connecticut to meet with
customers impacted by the tragedy. And we have created a special Workers'
Compensation CAT Unit, staffed by employees from around the country, to expedite
the processing of work comp- related benefit payments. Many of the World Trade
Center tenants devastated by the tragedy are valued Chubb commercial insurance
customers. Beginning September 13, we started wire transferring advance payments
to our customers, so they could begin the process of rebuilding their business.
And we have designated special teams of claim adjusters dedicated to handling
some of our larger customers' workers compensation claims.
Most of our
affected customers, at least from the business standpoint, are relatively
sophisticated. Businesses typically have procedures in place to facilitate the
claims notification process. But we must also be mindful that many homeowners'
insurance customers, such as many residents of communities like Battery Park
City, are only just now being allowed back to their condominiums and apartments,
or their automobiles, to begin assessing the damage they sustained.
For
our displaced personal insurance customers, we have authorized advance payments
for temporary housing, auto rental and clothing, so that their daily lives can
be made as comfortable as possible under these trying circumstances.
We
have also made advance payments to both personal and commercial customers,
including the families of those customers whose employees are missing, for
counseling and medical services.
In many cases, our claim adjusters have
not yet been able to assess damage fully and will not be able to do so until
they are allowed more access to the area around "ground zero." In such
instances, we have been meeting with customers at off- site locations throughout
New York, New Jersey and Connecticut as well as, of course, by telephone. We
will focus on our obligations to our customers and, together with our agents and
brokers, make sure that no client, personal or commercial, is left behind. I
believe that each of the other major insurance carriers have the same or very
similar processes in effect. In concert with our claims response to honor our
business promises, we also took swift action to remember those personally
touched by the tragedy. Though thankfully no Chubb staff members were lost, a
number of employees have relatives, friends and neighbors among the missing and
the dead. As a corporate family, we mourn their losses, as well as the loss of
hundreds of colleagues in the agent and broker community. In our home office, we
granted paid time off for employees who volunteer on EMS units and fire
departments, so they could participate in the massive rescue effort. Many
employees donated blood as well as critical supplies needed for the rescuers -
items like work gloves, socks, t-shirts and facemasks. We donated
$
1 million to the various September 11 disaster relief funds,
and we doubled the Chubb corporate contribution to our employee matching gifts
program for these funds as well. So as you can see, we have been personally
touched by the enormity of the situation, on virtually every level.
Question 2: Are the immediate human needs of the victims of the tragedy
being met by insurers? - Regarding the human needs of the victims, I refer to
the description of the above steps we have taken, particularly regarding the
response to our personal insurance customers. Beyond that, I can say, firmly and
unequivocally: meeting the immediate human needs is our first and ongoing
priority. Throughout the years, insurers have long had experience in responding
to the victims of catastrophic events: hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, floods
whatever the calamity, the insurance industry provides for both the financial
loss but also the human loss.
When handling a claim, our first priority
is to provide immediate cash and facilities for feeding, clothing and housing
victims. Our catastrophe claims handlers are our most experienced and I can
personally attest that they are doing everything humanly possible to carry out
their responsibilities swiftly and equitably, as well as compassionately.
Question 3: How do you think that insurers and risk purchasers will
change their insurance coverages as a consequence of this tragedy? - Insurers
and risk purchasers likely will change insurance coverages as a consequence of
this tragedy. I can only speak from Chubb's perspective; but for a glimpse of
how things may change we need only look at the immediate problem experienced by
the airline industry in obtaining insurance. Thankfully, Congress acted very
quickly, on a bipartisan basis, to meet that industry's need for terrorism
coverage. The market appears to be responding.
It may be that terrorism
risk is no longer insurable. We now know the level of catastrophe that can
occur. Timing is absolutely random and thankfully by definition not given to the
law of large numbers. If something can't be predicted, or priced in some
fashion, it is very difficult for the private market to respond. On the other
hand, purchasers are now far more sensitive to the need for this coverage.
Consequently, we believe demand will greatly increase. Purchasers will demand
specific terrorist coverage. There is adequate capacity to deal with the
September 11 tragedy. However, as an example I remind the Committee that we are
currently in Hurricane season. If we fall prey to a catastrophic hurricane
another wave of terrorist acts, or any other calamitous event, industry solvency
could be called into question. Accordingly, we should work together to make sure
all the coverage needs of U.S. businesses are met. We can meet this crisis, but
we must prepare for the future. We suggest looking at examples of how other
countries deal with terrorism and war risks.
We respectfully suggest
that the Committee closely monitor how the U.S. market reacts to this situation
and, if necessary, consider mechanisms for covering
terrorism
and war risk in the event the
insurance industry cannot
respond. In addition, we believe that state
insurance
regulators have a role in strengthening the long-term viability of the industry.
If
terrorism is going to be covered for U.S. citizens, either
by government or private
insurance, those costs must be spread
across the entire country - not just the city of New York. In this situation,
state regulators have broad latitude to either facilitate, or inhibit, the
availability and affordability of such coverages.
While there may be
market dislocation concerning terrorism risks, other changes may be positive in
terms of the overall risk management marketplace. We will see an increased focus
on security and protection against catastrophe not only from physical terrorism,
but other forms of terrorism, such as cyber-terrorism, as well as natural
disasters. I believe we will see a much greater emphasis on disaster and
contingency planning going forward. Greater focus should, in particular, be
placed on current weaknesses in our economic, information, energy and
transportation infrastructures. For example, last week The Association of
Certified Fraud Examiners published an alert about potential cyber-terrorism
attacks. A heightened sense of urgency regarding risk management will no doubt
improve the insurance marketplace in these areas.
All of us must focus
on developing loss control measures, redundancy, and protection of our national
infrastructure. Teamwork among loss control, risk management and security
professionals will greatly enhance our ability to stay one step ahead. This is
not only prudent business practice; it may well provide avenues for tracking
terrorism. I note the reported evidence that to finance their operations, the
terrorist cells used computer networks to communicate, engaged in computer
crime, and plotted investment strategies.
Question 4: What kind of
disaster recovery plans do insurers have in place? -Insurers are in the business
of risk. In addition to counseling customers about how to develop and implement
disaster plans, we also have such plans at the ready. Chubb, for example, has a
disaster plan in place for each of our offices throughout the United States, for
use in the event of either a natural or man-made disaster. The most
comprehensive of these plans is for our corporate headquarters, and includes a
complete backup of all records at an offsite location to which key employees
would report in the event of a catastrophe so we can continue operations while
hardly missing a beat. We also have an evacuation plan for our 2,500 home office
employees.
CONCLUSION
The insurance industry can meet this
crisis.
Regarding the future: we are very interested in working with you
to respond to the insurance needs of all U.S. business and citizens. We will
help rebuild lower Manhattan, the financial capital of our country and the
world, and we will respond to the losses from the Pennsylvania and Virginia
attacks. Not only will we do so; we, as well as our nation, will prosper in the
long term. Ultimately I envision a more vibrant economy as well as a more secure
and free America.
We believe going forward the Committee should continue
its focus on claims handling and market reaction to future risks. We should
monitor the claims consolidation provisions in the Air Transportation Safety and
System Stabilization Act to determine if they are having the desired effect of
getting compensation out quickly at minimal cost. And we need to monitor whether
the insurance market can respond to future terrorist attacks - which, by
definition, are impossible to either predict or price. Thank you for this
opportunity to address the Committee. I look forward to answering your questions
and working together on these issues in the challenging months ahead.
LOAD-DATE: September 27, 2001