Copyright 2001 Federal News Service, Inc.
Federal News Service
October 25, 2001, Thursday
SECTION: PREPARED TESTIMONY
LENGTH: 686 words
HEADLINE:
PREPARED STATEMENT OF WALTER K. KNORR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, CITY OF CHICAGO
BEFORE THE
SENATE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING
AND URBAN AFFAIRS
SUBJECT - THE AVAILABILITY OF
TERRORISM
INSURANCE COVERAGE
BODY: Thank you, Mr.
Chairman for inviting me to testify today.
My name is Walter Knorr and I
am the Chief Financial Officer of the City of Chicago.
I appreciate the
opportunity to present to the Committee a matter of great concern to the City of
Chicago and, I'm sure, to other cities throughout America.
The cost of
war-and-
terrorism liability
insurance as a
result of the tragic acts of September 11th has escalated to incredible levels.
The
insurance industry is uncertain about the risk of
terrorism, and therefore unable to assess and price that risk.
In Chicago, our
insurance carrier recently canceled our
war-and-
terrorism liability
insurance
coverage for Chicago O'Hare International Airport and Chicago Midway Airport.
Prior to September 11th, we paid an annual premium of
$
125,000 for $
750 million of
war-and-
terrorism liability coverage.
If we want to
renew our
insurance, it will cost us $
6.95
million for $
150 million of war-and-terrorism liability
coverage.
I'll repeat those figures for you. Our premium has risen from
$
125,000 to $
6,950,000. Our coverage has
dropped by $
600 million.
That is a premium increase of
over 5000 percent for substantially less coverage.
Expressed another
way, the cost of $
1,000 of coverage has risen from 16 cents to
$
46.33 -- an increase of 28,956 percent.
This
extraordinary cost increase would be passed along primarily to our tenants at
O'Hare and Midway, namely the airlines operating out of those two airports.
The financial problems of those airlines have been well publicized. A
cost increase of this magnitude would negate the City's efforts to cut the costs
of airport operations to benefit the airlines and keep them viable.
It
also would undo the efforts of this Congress to assist the airlines financially
during these uncertain times.
Chicago is not alone in this. We are aware
of a number of other major airports across the country that have received
equally exorbitant quotes for war-and-terrorism liability coverage.
In
addition, the Chicago airports have been warned that their premiums for property
and liability insurance may double, triple or even quadruple - and deductibles
will increase significantly.
The problem extends beyond airports. The
City of Chicago insures a toll bridge that connects Interstate 94 to the Indiana
Tollway. Our most recent annual premium was $
406,000 for
$
386 million of coverage.
In mid-September the City
received a non-renewal notice for this bridge, with the ominous indication that
the insurance carrier could not quote a new rate, but that the rate will
increase by more than 30 percent.
One would expect
insurance costs associated with
terrorism to
increase substantially for many other public and private structures: existing
buildings, buildings under construction, public meeting areas like sports
stadiums and convention centers, and other prominent infrastructure. The
increased insurance costs would undoubtedly be passed along to the tenants and
users of the these assets. If those costs were significant -- and I think they
would be -- they would have an extremely negative economic impact.
Tenants would have to decide whether to pay those higher costs or leave
the city and take jobs with them.
The insurance crisis hits major cities
the hardest because cities Would appear to be the most likely targets for
terrorist attacks.
While terrorists may pick out individual targets, the
attacks are directed at the nation as a whole and the risk should be spread to
the nation as a whole.
In these uncertain times, the federal government
should act as an insurer for future terrorist attack, and catastrophic
There are two proposals before this committee, and the City of Chicago
is not taking a position on the two proposals.
The City does believe it
is imperative that the Federal government act on the insurance problem to
provide certainty of insurance at reasonable rates, and hopefully mitigate the
cost to government and business.
Thank you again for this opportunity. I
will be available for any questions you might have.
END
LOAD-DATE: October 31, 2001