Copyright 2002 The Washington Post
The
Washington Post
September 11, 2002, Wednesday, Final Edition
SECTION: FINANCIAL; Pg. E03
LENGTH: 475 words
HEADLINE:
Terrorism Insurance Still Rare; Industry Waits for Congress to
Back Coverage for Attacks
BYLINE: Jackie Spinner,
Washington Post Staff Writer
BODY:
A year after the Sept. 11 attacks, terrorism insurance
remains largely unavailable to big commercial property holders, a problem that
will not go away without federal intervention, said Maurice R. Greenberg, chief
executive of insurance giant American International Group.
Although AIG
offers some terrorism insurance, its policies are limited, as are those of its
competitors, Greenberg said yesterday in a discussion of terrorism insurance at
the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
"We're
in the business of risk," he said. But "I'm not going to bet the company on a
single event." Congress has been grappling for months with how to address the
shortage of terrorism coverage through legislation that would provide a federal
backup to help pay insurance claims resulting from terrorist attacks.
Congressional sources said there was little progress during the August
recess in resolving differences between competing House and Senate bills. Both
bills are designed to provide an incentive for insurers to offer more coverage.
The Senate bill would provide insurers with billions of dollars to help pay
claims. The House measure also would provide government funding but would
require the money to be repaid by insurers and policyholders.
A
conference committee chaired by Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes (D-Md.) has not convened,
and Jesse Jacobs, a spokesman for Sarbanes, said yesterday that no official
meeting has been scheduled.
But Rep. Michael G. Oxley (R-Ohio), chairman
of the House Financial Services Committee, said key conference members met
informally during the special congressional session last week in New York.
Oxley said he expects the final bill to be ready by the end of the
month.
"We have been fortunate that -- with the exception of the anthrax
episode -- no further attacks have happened," said Oxley, who participated in
the discussion with Greenberg. "But if another major attack were to occur, the
same insurance system is no longer in place to ensure that victims are
compensated and made whole and prepared to face additional events."
Some
consumer advocacy groups oppose the legislation and have argued that the
insurance industry should resolve the issue on its own.
But Greenberg
said the world reinsurance industry -- which provides insurance for insurance
companies -- is still offering very limited coverage and has little incentive to
get back in the market.
He said reinsurers have faced catastrophic
losses beyond the Sept. 11 attacks, including the recent floods in Europe.
Greenberg said he would buy reinsurance to back up AIG's policies if
full coverage existed.
But it doesn't, he said, and "the only one that
has that is the guy with the printing press, the U.S. government, because we're
dealing with liabilities that are enormous."
LOAD-DATE:
September 11, 2002