Copyright 2001 The Washington Post
The
Washington Post
November 28, 2001, Wednesday, Final Edition
SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. A34
LENGTH: 347 words
HEADLINE:
Insuring Against Catastrophe
BODY: It's
hard to argue with multi-billionaire Warren Buffett on matters of money, but
even he admitted to doing something "very dumb" when his company wrote
"insurance coverage for a huge catastrophe loss" without charging a premium ["An
FDIC for Insurers," op-ed, Nov. 19]. Now he urges Congress to ignore three other
equally sound insurance principles as it considers plans for federal terror
insurance.
Mr. Buffett worries that "the proposals now being considered
will engender pricing based upon risk exposure," so he advocates its
elimination. Even the FDIC he admires can charge a risk-based premium. Should
the insurer who underwrites a terror policy at taxpayer risk charge the same
price for the coverage whether or not the client has taken prudent steps to
improve security or evacuation plans?
Should a new building that might
be more vulnerable to terror attack be constructed instead of one that might
account for possible attacks and qualify for lower insurance rates? Of course
not.
His plan would also underwrite all insurance industry terror
losses. But even the most naive insurance consumer is familiar with the need for
an insurance deductible. Taxpayer payment for the first dollar of losses would
undercut incentives for insurers to demand that their clients increase security
or pay commensuratively higher premiums. At the least, a capped level of
financial risk should remain in the private sector, which will price the
insurance according to risks taken by the consumer.
Perhaps the most
bizarre aspect of his proposal is that federal terror insurance should pay all
insurance company claims. There must be a substantial co-payment by the
insurance company in order to guard against fraud and inflated claims by
clients. It is easy for insurance companies to keep customers happy if they have
little financial incentive to monitor claims. We don't want them keeping their
most profitable customers happy by spending other people's money -- ours.
DAVID KEATING
Senior Counselor
National Taxpayers Union
Alexandria
LOAD-DATE: November 28, 2001