THIS SEARCH THIS DOCUMENT THIS CR ISSUE GO TO
Next Hit Forward Next Document New CR Search
Prev Hit Back Prev Document HomePage
Hit List Best Sections Daily Digest Help
Contents Display
OPPOSITION TO CONFERENCE AGREEMENT ON BANKRUPTCY REFORM -- HON. JANICE D.
SCHAKOWSKY (Extensions of Remarks - July 29, 2002)
[Page: E1467] GPO's PDF
---
HON. JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY
OF ILLINOIS
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Friday, July 26, 2002
- Ms. SCHAKOWSKY. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the conference report
on H.R. 333 ``The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act.''
This legislation puts the interests of politically powerful credit card
companies ahead of the interests of seniors and working families. That is why
this conference report is opposed by every major consumer rights organization,
over twenty women's right organizations, and the AFL-CIO. This is flawed
legislation that could not come at a worse time. I urge my colleagues to
reject this conference report.
- Last year, a record 1.45 million people filed bankruptcy. Experts
attribute this to deteriorating economic conditions and rising consumer debts.
Research shows that nine in ten bankruptcies are triggered by the loss of a
job, high medical bills or divorce. Yet this legislation would not allow a
bankruptcy judge to take into account whether a debtor is blameless for his or
her financial problem when decising whether the person can declare chapter 7
bankruptcy unless the debtor is a victim of terrorism. This will make it very
difficult for consumers to escape debt.
- This legislation will have especially harsh impact on senior citizens and
women. According to research by the Consumer Bankruptcy Project at Harvard
University, seniors are the fastest growing group in bankruptcy. About 82,000
Americans over 65 years-of-age filed for bankruptcy in 2001, up 244 percent
since 1991. We will put seniors at the mercy of price-gouging card
companies.
- Women represent the single largest group in bankruptcy, with households
headed by women accounting for about 40 percent of all bankruptcies today.
This legislation will make it harder for them to escape debt and poverty by
creating new types of ``nondischargeable'' credit card debts. The legislation
puts banks in competition with women trying to collect child support from a
former spouse after bankruptcy. Debtors will have to pay back more money in
credit card debts after clearing bankruptcy, leaving less money for child
support and alimony. Proponents of the conference report claim that this
legislation gives top priority to women trying to collect child support when
distributing assets in Chapter 7 cases. However, more than 90 percent of all
chapter 7 debtors have no assets to distribute. They have no protection at
all.
- Amazingly, this conference report expands the most egregious abuse of the
bankruptcy system by expanding the scope of the luxury home loophole to all
fifty states. In five states, a debtor can hide all their resources in their
home. Unless a debtor is guilty of a very narrow range of fraud or felonies,
is declaring bankruptcy within 40 months of buying a home or has moved in from
another state in the last two years, the loophole remains. This legislation
will allow debtors to export the unlimited homestead exemptions for two years.
This means that corporate thieves like former Enron CEO Ken Lay can move to my
district and escape paying investors and workers. Ken Lay comes from Texas.
Texas is one of the five states that does not have a cap on their homestead
exemption. At the same time a laid-off worker from a state like Delaware that
does not have a homestead exemption will lose a home that has as little equity
as $30,000. This is an outrageous double standard.
- This legislation is also noticeably silent when it comes to the role of
credit card companies in increasing consumer debt and filed bankruptcies over
the past decade. Credit card companies sent out five billion solicitations
last year. Credit card companies target college students. College students
lack independent means and have a high credit risk. Yet this legislation does
not curb these practices in any significant way. Language to require
responsible lending to college
students has been severely weakened.
- Also this bill does nothing to curb the practices of predatory lenders, who will be able to
collect debts regardless of how they deceived consumers. This bill allows most
lenders to provide only a general statement on the credit card bill about the
risks of paying at the minimum rate and a toll-free number. Most consumers
will not receive information that details the long-term risk of accumulating
credit card debt.