Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: predatory lending
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 149 of 584. Next Document

Copyright 2002 San Antonio Express-News  
San Antonio Express-News (Texas)

May 16, 2002, Thursday , METRO

SECTION: BUSINESS; Pg. 1E

LENGTH: 641 words

HEADLINE: Abortion amendment may sink key bankruptcy reform bill

BYLINE: David Hendricks 



BODY:  Only in Washington could abortion become an issue in a bankruptcy reform bill.  

It's there, all right. Abortion may stall the bankruptcy bill that has been a back-and-forth badminton in the halls of Congress for almost 11/2 years.  

If abortion kills the bill, that would be bad news for the lending industry and half-good and half-bad for consumers.  

The bill has been in a House-Senate conference committee since last year, when each chamber passed separate bankruptcy reform bills.  

On April 23, the conference committee agreed to a $125,000 home equity protection limit in cases where bankruptcy filers have committed fraud or other criminal acts, including securities violations, or is subject to criminal charges.  

The committee did this out of anger about former Enron Corp. executives in Texas who are sheltering their multimillion-dollar homes from possible liabilities stemming from the company's collapse, according to the Consumer Bankers Association's CBA Reports newsletter.  

Texas and Florida are among five states that allow an unlimited exemption for home equity. Any new federal law would supersede state laws.  

The conference committee also agreed to require debtors to meet a residency requirement of 30 months before filing for bankruptcy in such states. That would prevent someone from buying a home on the way to bankruptcy court.  

Left unresolved, though, at April 23 and April 30 conference committee meetings was an amendment by Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., that would prevent anyone convicted of abortion clinic violence from using bankruptcy to avoid paying fines.  

That does not happen very often, but abortion is such emotional issue that members of Congress want to avoid voting on any measure mentioning abortion during an election year because opponents will use it against them.  

Committee Chairman Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., R-Wis., has set another conference committee meeting for Monday. If the abortion clinic issue is not resolved, the bill is in trouble for the rest of year, said Travis Plunkett, legislative director for the Consumer Federation of America.  

After the Memorial Day break, Plunkett said, Congress will face numerous other bills, and members will be more entrenched in their positions on bankruptcy reform.  

Plunkett believes something close to the current bill will be approved eventually. When? "Your guess is as good as mine," he said.  

The lending industry has been pushing for this reform for years. Most Americans, polls indicate, agree that debtors can escape their debts too easily, raising the cost of credit for everyone.  

Unfortunately, the bankruptcy reform bill does virtually nothing to make credit companies more careful how they extend credit and who gets it.  

"There are no restraints on lenders," Plunkett said.  

A proposal to stop lenders from promoting credit cards to college students with no credit history failed, as did another that would allow debtors with high-cost predatory mortgage loans from discharging that debt.  

"This is not real reform," Plunkett said. "The bill puts harsh restraints on people who are not abusing the law."  

Plunkett acknowledges that bankruptcy numbers have been high recently, but says that's because of rising jobless rates and cutbacks in employer health benefits.  

Plunkett further cited economists who believe the current bankruptcy law has been a restraint on aggressive lending practices, and that lenders will become even more reckless if the reform bill passes.  

Abortion may or may not sink the pending bankruptcy reform bill. Either way, the electorate must press for a consumer-oriented balance in a new legislation after this bill becomes law, or in new bill later if this one fails.  

dhendricks@express-news.net  



LOAD-DATE: May 17, 2002




Previous Document Document 149 of 584. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2004 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.