Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: predatory lending
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 417 of 584. Next Document

Copyright 2001 Gannett Company, Inc.  
USA TODAY

July 27, 2001, Friday, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: MONEY; Pg. 3B

LENGTH: 449 words

HEADLINE: Panel hears tales of predatory lenders

BYLINE: Thomas A. Fogarty

DATELINE: WASHINGTON

BODY:
WASHINGTON -- Unscrupulous lenders are forcing people out of their homes, and Congress must act, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Paul Sarbanes says.


The Maryland Democrat commented at the start of a 2-day hearing on predatory lending. The panel heard borrowers detail a litany of abuses that, for the most part, are within the law.


Mary Podelco, a retiree from Montgomery, W. Va., told lawmakers how aggressive lenders hounded her into foreclosure just 2 years after she took out her first loan against a home she had owned outright.


Podelco says she initially borrowed in 1995 to pay for new windows and heating. A series of lenders persuaded her into seven refinancings. Each rolled new equity-eating fees into higher and higher loan balances, a practice known as "flipping." Her monthly house payment rose to $ 434, nearly consuming the $ 470 a month Social Security check that provided her livelihood.


"I now understand they pushed me into loans I couldn't pay," she said.


Calling predatory lending "a national scandal," Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller told the committee of other practices by lenders intent on raiding equity built up over years by low-income, unsophisticated homeowners:


* Use of "bird dogs," or loan prospectors, paid to identify easy targets.


* Use of balloon payments that hold down initial monthly costs until a specified date, when borrowers face a huge balance they have no chance of paying. That triggers foreclosure.


* Prepayment penalties that lock in the deal even after the borrower recognizes the problems.


Industry representatives condemn such practices, but say laws are in place to deal with the troublemakers. The Federal Reserve and the Federal Trade Commission each have authority to crack down, they say.


But Sarbanes, who became chairman with the Democratic takeover of the Senate in June, says tougher laws are needed.


Both sides agree that any action to curb cheaters must allow legitimate lenders to continue operating. Some of those lenders charge higher fees and interest rates to offset the higher risk of making loans to borrowers with impaired credit.


A recent wave of state and local legislation has caused reputable lenders to withdraw from certain locales. The losers in that, industry officials argue, are the low-income borrowers who lose access to credit.


"It's a problem that needs to be addressed with a hard head as well as a soft heart," said Charles Calomiris, an American Enterprise Institute economist. He says the only role for Congress now is to stop the growing patchwork of laws aimed at predators but which stifle legitimate mortgage firms.
 


LOAD-DATE: August 03, 2001




Previous Document Document 417 of 584. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2004 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.