Copyright 2002 The Washington Post

The Washington Post
May 2, 2002 Thursday
Final
EditionSECTION: FINANCIAL; Pg. E03
LENGTH: 725 words
HEADLINE: Bill
Targets Predatory Mortgage Loans;
Report Finds Race Is a Factor for
Borrowers' Costs
BYLINE: Sandra Fleishman,
Washington Post Staff Writer
BODY:New legislation to curb unscrupulous mortgage
lending won't restrict consumer loan choices, Senate Banking Committee Chairman
Paul S. Sarbanes (D-Md.) said yesterday at a news conference unveiling a
proposal co-sponsored by 14 Senate Democrats.
Lender
groups, though, say the disappearance of valuable loan alternatives would be an
unintended consequence of Sarbanes's bill, which would increase the pool of
loans deemed high-cost and expand federal consumer protections on those loans.
Because loans that the government labels high-cost
carry additional compliance burdens and have a reputation as potentially
abusive, lenders will choose not to make them, the groups say. They are making
the same argument in 30-plus states and cities where similar proposals are under
consideration. As evidence, they point to the District, where lawmakers
overhauled legislation after lenders pulled out last year.
This difference of opinion is at the heart of the national debate over
how to curb predatory lending -- loans with excessive fees, high interest rates,
and terms that are targeted at borrowers who either don't understand or can't
afford them. The borrowers frequently lose their houses to foreclosure.
Yesterday's news conference focused on the devastating
effect that such loans have on minority and elderly borrowers, as well as on
neighborhoods and cities.
Sarbanes's supporters also
raised civil rights concerns over a study released at the conference that
suggests that race, rather than income or credit risk, is the reason people get
high-cost loans. The study's authors say that high-cost lenders are not
adequately regulated and that banks in general are still not serving minority
communities.
Concern about predatory loans has
exploded as the number of high-cost, or subprime, loans has mushroomed in recent
years. While legitimate subprime loans tailored to those with blemished credit
are welcomed by Sarbanes and consumer and civil rights groups, those that
ensnare people are not.
The American Financial
Services Association, the national trade association for finance companies,
reiterated in a statement yesterday that "additional restrictions" on high-cost
loans "are not the answer."
That "won't deter the bad
actors intent on breaking the law -- but could deter legitimate lenders now
offering credit to needy borrowers," the AFSA said.
The AFSA, the Mortgage Bankers Association of America and other lending
groups say increased consumer education, enforcement of existing laws on fraud
and simplification of the mortgage process will protect vulnerable borrowers
more than new laws would.
But more than a dozen civil
rights, consumer and community groups, including the Leadership Conference on
Civil Rights, the NAACP, the Consumer Federation of America and the U.S.
Conference of Mayors, yesterday endorsed the bill and the need for federal
legislation.
"Today predatory lending is one of the
greatest threats to families working to achieve financial security," said Wade
Henderson, executive director of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights.
The proposed legislation "seeks to rein in those who prey
on our communities like drug dealers, but who wear ties instead of gold
necklaces," Richmond Mayor Rudolph C. McCollum Jr. said.
McCollum was among those who cited an underlying racial bias in
high-cost lending, pointing to the new study, which showed a higher
concentration of subprime loans to African American borrowers in Richmond at all
income levels.
The study by the Center for Community
Change, a housing advocacy group based in Washington, found that racial
disparities in subprime lending exist in all regions and all cities and
"counterintuitively, increase as minority homeowners' income increase."
The study also found that upper-income blacks are 1.29
times as likely to get a subprime loan as lower-income whites.
Said McCollum, "The study clearly shows that there's something going on
here other than eligibility."
Baltimore was seventh in
the country in disparities between upper-income blacks and lower-income whites,
and the Washington metro area was 16th. Almost half of the upper-income blacks
who took out loans in Baltimore received subprime loans, according to the study,
while 37 percent of the upper-income blacks taking out loans in the Washington
area got subprime loans.
LOAD-DATE: May 2, 2002