Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: broadband deployment
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Previous Document Document 7 of 16. Next Document

Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company  
The Boston Globe

May 23, 2002, Thursday ,THIRD EDITION

SECTION: BUSINESS; Pg. C1

LENGTH: 843 words

HEADLINE: DTE CHIEF SEES NO CRISIS IN BROADBAND VASINGTON ENDORSES HIGH-SPEED NET SERVICES DRIVEN BY FREE MARKET

BYLINE: By Peter J. Howe, Globe Staff

BODY:
Massachusetts' new top telecommunications regulator said yesterday that there is "no crisis in broadband deployment" and urged government officials to depend on the free market to promote wider, better-priced access to high-speed Internet services.

Testifying before the US Senate in Washington, D.C., Paul B. Vasington, named chairman of the state Department of Telecommunications and Energy by Acting Governor Jane M. Swift this month, said the latest DTE figures indicate Massachusetts has more high-speed Internet lines per resident than any other state, trailing only the District of Columbia in broadband access. Citing company confidentiality, the DTE did not release the exact number.

   Broadband advocates bemoan the fact that barely 10 million US homes have signed up for high-speed Net service. But, Vasington said, "The so-called problem is that most people do not want to pay what it costs to deliver the services because they don't see the value as being equal to the cost," typically $46 to $50 a month.

"The question we should be asking is: Are there customers willing to pay what it costs to serve them who can't get services? If so, we should look for the barriers that are keeping suppliers from these customers," Vasington said. He added that "if the issue is just that people are not willing to pay for services that we think they should want, then there is little role for government."

Verizon Communications has said it will not expand availability of digital subscriber line Net access beyond the current 60 percent of Massachusetts phone lines unless Congress curtails requirements that the company share its upgraded networks with competitors. AT&T Broadband has outlined plans to add cable modem service in Boston and 13 suburbs this year, but has yet to upgrade dozens of cable franchises for high-speed Net service, citing a lack of capital.

The Massachusetts Software and Internet Council and the Mass. Tech Collaborative, a quasipublic agency in Westborough, have been pushing a "Mass. Broadband" initiative for months to try to speed the rollout of high-speed Net services to unserved areas of the Bay State, particularly rural parts of Central and Western Massachusetts, where the collaborative wants to create a buyers' cooperative as it has in Berkshire County.

As the US Senate's Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee continued hearings on broadband policy, ranking Republican John S. McCain of Arizona - authorized to call just one witness - tapped Vasington.

While some consumer groups and Beacon Hill Democrats welcomed Swift's replacement of former DTE chairman James Connelly with Vasington, saying they expected Vasington to be more fair-minded, his Capitol Hill Washington testimony confirmed Vasington's longstanding description of himself as a free-market Republican.

Vasington said he does not see the recent spate of bankruptcies of small Verizon Communications competitors as "demonstrating the failure of competition" as promised by the 1996 federal telecom act.

While the number of competitive local exchange carriers, or CLECs, operating in the state has plunged in the last two years, Vasington said CLECs' overall market share has continued to grow, to 21.1 percent of all wireline phone lines in the state as of December.

"The problem may be that we are trying to judge the success of competitive markets based on our expectations from our long experience in a regulated environment," Vasington said. "Markets . . . are characterized by creative destruction. There is turbulence, customer dislocation, business failure, supply rushing ahead of demand and vice versa."

Vasington said he does see some roles for state and federal policy makers: creating "a sound economic foundation" at the macroeconomic level, cutting taxes on telecom services, making it easier for phone companies to build wireless towers and lay cables, and improving access to airwave "spectrum" for new wireless services.

On the issue of Baby Bells pushing for deregulation that would limit requirements they share their networks with broadband service competitors, Vasington backed as "legitimate" the current rules requiring phone companies to make their existing copper phone lines available to competitors who provide high-speed Net access over digital subscriber lines.

But, Vasington said, "There is a legitimate concern about the next generation of broadband services, most likely fiber-based - which will be capable of delivering much higher speeds to customers. Unless the prices charged for access to this new infrastructure adequately cover the risk of the investment, network companies will be reluctant to provide next-generation broadband services."

Vasington said regulating rates for access to old phone lines but imposing no rules on new infrastructure "is a compromise that could form the foundation for a policy that truly promotes local telecommunications competition as the means to greater broadband deployment."

Peter J. Howe can be reached at howe@globe.com.

LOAD-DATE: May 23, 2002




Previous Document Document 7 of 16. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2003 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.