Skip banner Home   Sources   How Do I?   Site Map   What's New   Help  
Search Terms: open access, broadband
  FOCUS™    
Edit Search
Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed   Document 1 of 157. Next Document

Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company  
The Boston Globe

December 9, 2002, Monday ,THIRD EDITION

SECTION: BUSINESS; Pg. C1

LENGTH: 759 words

HEADLINE: TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION;
Material from Globe wire services was used in this report.;
AOL IN HIGH-STAKES MOVE PITCHES $15 SERVICE TO BROADBAND SUBSCRIBERS

BYLINE: By Peter J. Howe, Globe Staff

BODY:
Internet service giant America Online has long argued that the reason it has attracted 25 million US subscribers is because of its compelling content and services, not just a reliable nationwide dial-up network for getting e-mail and sending instant messages.

Now AOL is about to expose that boast to a high-stakes test in the marketplace, as it rolls out a bid to get broadband subscribers of other Net providers to agree to shell out an extra $15 a month for access to AOL communications, information, and shopping services, as well as some special features like music and video from AOL's Time Warner counterparts.

   Cable modems and digital subscriber line systems are eating away at the once steady growth in AOL's core dial-up franchise. So AOL Time Warner last week unveiled its strategy to clamber onto a broadband train that is picking up steam and threatening to leave behind the company that first popularized the Net for the US market.

The growing broadband threat to subscriber counts comes as AOL also warned last week that its advertising and e-commerce revenues could plunge by 40 to 50 percent next year.

At the same time, rival Web giants are forming broadband alliances of their own that will offer many of the features AOL is touting, including MSN with Verizon Communications, and Qwest and Yahoo with SBC Communications.

Besides boosting efforts to resell broadband AOL through providers such as Covad and Comcast, AOL is also trying to keep some of the revenues when its current $24-a-month dial-up customers migrate to $40 and $50 cable broadband and DSL packages, through a $14.95 package of AOL features and services.

"Would it be better if we did some of this earlier? Yes," AOL chairman Stephen M. Case told reporters after a meeting with analysts in New York. "But we are where we are, and we are going to move forward."

Besides having an AOL e-mail address and instant messaging, and access to its "walled garden" of media content and shopping, broadband subscribers to the $15 monthly package would next year be offered some special services.

They would include music and video clips from Time Warner music and entertainment divisions, online access to CNN TV broadcasts that are now sold separately for $5 a month, easier systems to share digital photographs and home video with other users, and access to premium versions of the McAfee computer virus scanning software to protect users' home PCs.

While more details of what the $15 package could include will come out over the next several weeks, the immediate question many analysts had was how many subscribers already paying $50 a month for broadband Net access would find AOL's offerings worth paying another 30 percent premium, especially in a weak economy.

Charles Hoffman, chief executive of Covad Communications, which has signed a deal to begin providing wholesale DSL access for AOL in Boston and other US markets this winter, said he thinks AOL's shift toward having more of its subscribers use outsourced broadband connections instead of AOL-managed dial-up connections "makes perfect sense."

But reacting to the $15 broadband services package, Hoffman said: "I personally think that their price may be a little high, but I guess the market will tell us. . . . The better the content, the more people adopt broadband."

Jeff Chester of the Center for Digital Democracy, a Washington group that opposes big media consolidations, said he believes AOL's policy is ironically being driven by the lack of "open access" requirements for cable modem networks that Time Warner strenuously lobbied against becoming conditions of the $165 billion AOL Time Warner merger two years ago.

Because AOL is having such a hard time getting access to cable systems as an Internet service provider, Chester said, it is forced to cast about for ways to keep at least some revenues coming in when its customers defect to cable broadband, which accounts for about two-thirds of all new broadband growth.

"They have to re structure how they do business if they are going to survive, given the policy choices they have helped create," Chester said.

Jonathan Miller, who was picked as the AOL division's chief executive in August, said: "AOL is a business in transition. We don't pretend to have all the answers."

And AOL vice chairman Ted Leonsis put it even more plaintively: "We are a humbled company. We want our members to love us and need us once again."

Peter J. Howe can be reached at howe@globe.com.

LOAD-DATE: December 9, 2002




Document 1 of 157. Next Document
Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2003 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.